Skip to main content
Hacked: The Streamer Game Cover

About

Hacked: The Streamer is a single player open world role playing game with horror, drama, mystery, thriller and others themes. It was developed by NAISU and was released on April 6, 2026. It received positive reviews from players.

You are blackmailed in Hacked: The Streamer. Investigate clues, make impactful decisions, and shape your story to uncover the culprit is in this thrilling interactive movie. The fate of PinkyPie, a fan-favorite streamer, is in your hands.

Skip User Reviews

83%Audience ScoreBased on 60 reviews
story13 positive mentions
gameplay3 negative mentions

  • Engaging and interesting detective-style story with multiple branching paths and endings, offering good replay value.
  • Well-designed streaming interface and immersive FMV presentation that effectively conveys the pressures of online life.
  • Affordable for the amount of content, with decent graphics, sound, and a suspenseful mystery that keeps players guessing.
  • Acting performances are often flat or unconvincing, which undermines emotional impact and immersion.
  • Technical issues including bugs, skipped or buggy scenes, lack of basic features like chapter selection and menu shortcuts.
  • Some gameplay and narrative elements feel half-baked or underdeveloped, with pacing issues and inconsistent characterization.
  • story

    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is an engaging, choice-driven interactive thriller centered on a streamer facing online threats, featuring solid mystery elements and surprising plot twists that keep players invested. While praised for its immersive FMV presentation and meaningful choices, some find pacing issues, player traps, and limited replay value detract from its full potential. Overall, it appeals strongly to fans of narrative-driven games exploring online culture and surveillance themes.

    • “The story is strong enough to carry it, but you can feel the gap between what the script is reaching for and what's actually on screen.”
    • “This is the reason I support indie developers, the experience was like an interactive movie with an interesting story and decent acting that gets better as the game progresses; you can tell the actors get more comfortable as the game goes on, the culprit was not as obvious as I thought, and I would play it again to see the other endings and choices.”
    • “For those who enjoy story-driven experiences, this works well, allowing the plot and characters to take center stage.”
    • “This might sound fine, but the game's full of player traps that will literally cause entire story beats to skip, for evidence gathering to completely get sidetracked or to literally be useless to your goal.”
    • “The story seems to be extremely packed with hints of ideas that they had and wanted to develop, but just never actually bothered with.”
    • “The story isn't great, it's short, the game is missing a lot of the quality-of-life features you want from an FMV in 2026.”
  • gameplay

    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is solid and centers on decision-making rather than mechanical interaction, offering about 1.5 to 2 hours of playtime. While minor bugs do not impact the experience, some players may find the reset map mechanic and limited interaction restrictive. Overall, the gameplay is engaging and complements the story effectively.

    • “The gameplay is solid.”
    • “But again, the story and the gameplay are compelling enough to make this an enjoyable game.”
    • “Emphasis is on 'all your playthroughs' for this game resets the map every time, making it just a superfluous detail that's essentially just a broken game mechanic.”
    • “The gameplay itself is intentionally limited, focusing on decision-making rather than mechanical interaction.”
    • “For others, particularly those expecting more active gameplay, the lack of interaction may feel restrictive.”
  • replayability

    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability is generally enhanced by branching paths and multiple endings, offering a web of possibilities that encourage multiple playthroughs. However, some users feel the core experience remains too similar, limiting the desire to replay after the initial run. Overall, the game has moderate replay value but may not strongly motivate all players to revisit it.

    • “These decisions branch into multiple outcomes, creating a web of possibilities that encourages replayability.”
    • “In terms of longevity, the game offers some replay value through its branching paths and multiple endings, but the core experience remains largely the same.”
    • “It does not have any replay value (the story doesn't change enough to make me want to play it again), especially after just playing it.”
    • “The games from Wales Interactive handle this much better, and it really adds to the replay value.”
  • graphics

    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are generally praised for their quality and concept, but some users feel the visuals lack excitement and basic playable elements. The art style is considered final and challenging to improve post-production.

    • “Graphics: good”
    • “The visuals are amazing and the concept is great.”
    • “Overall, the game lacks a lot of basic playable elements and art style.”
  • optimization

    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization is functional but not exceptional, relying heavily on performances and writing that some users find lacking compared to higher-quality productions. Overall, while technically adequate, the experience depends more on narrative elements than on polished performance execution.

  • emotional

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the emotional aspect includes impactful confrontations and reveals, but some feel the emotional payoff is lacking despite investing significant feelings in the character's journey.

    • “Confrontations, reveals, emotional beats.”
    • “I got way too emotionally invested in what happens to her.”
  • humor

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor is described as ironic and situational, drawing amusement from relatable, real-life social interactions. It may resonate particularly with those familiar with online streaming culture.

  • stability

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users report stability issues during fast-forwarding, including game glitches and incorrect language settings, which sometimes prevent making choices.

  • music

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the music to be quite basic and feel that the soundtracks could be improved for a more engaging experience.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Hacked: The Streamer

2h Median play time
2h Average play time
2-2h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Hacked: The Streamer
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Hacked: The Streamer is a open world role playing game with horror, drama, mystery, thriller and others themes.

Hacked: The Streamer is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5, Windows and others.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing Hacked: The Streamer.

Hacked: The Streamer was released on April 6, 2026.

Hacked: The Streamer was developed by NAISU.

Hacked: The Streamer has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Hacked: The Streamer for its story but disliked it for its gameplay.

Hacked: The Streamer is a single player game.

Similar games include The Operator, Dead Reset, SIMULACRA, Late Shift, Night Book and others.