Hacked: The Streamer

About

Hacked: The Streamer is a single player open world role playing game with horror, drama, mystery, thriller and others themes. It was developed by NAISU and was released on April 6, 2026. It received positive reviews from players.

You are blackmailed in Hacked: The Streamer. Investigate clues, make impactful decisions, and shape your story to uncover the culprit is in this thrilling interactive movie. The fate of PinkyPie, a fan-favorite streamer, is in your hands.

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 52 reviews

story10 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

Engaging mystery story with multiple branching paths and endings that encourage replayability.
Strong concept capturing the pressures of streaming and online life, with authentic streaming interface and atmosphere.
Good production values for an indie FMV, including decent cinematography and an improving acting performance.

Numerous bugs and technical issues affecting gameplay, including crashes, glitches, and menu problems.
Uneven acting quality and writing, with some dialogue feeling unnatural and several story elements feeling half-baked or underdeveloped.
Lack of basic quality-of-life features like chapter selection, better choice tracking, and more interactive gameplay limiting overall player engagement.

story
41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
69%
7%
The story is generally praised for its engaging mystery, unexpected plot twists, and strong immersion through FMV presentation, effectively drawing players into the streamer-themed thriller. While choices impact character reactions and multiple endings add some replay value, the narrative is sometimes criticized for pacing issues, player traps that skip key beats, and limited variability that may reduce replay motivation. Overall, it delivers a solid, if occasionally flawed, choice-driven story that appeals to fans of interactive mysteries.
- “This is the reason I support indie developers: the experience was like an interactive movie with an interesting story and decent acting that gets better as the game progresses. You can tell the actors get more comfortable as the game goes on, the culprit was not as obvious as I thought, and I would play it again to see the other endings and choices.”
- “Very solid point and click mystery with a pleasantly surprising amount of plot twists!”
- “If you like story-driven games where your choices really matter, this is a must-play.”
- “This might sound fine, but the game's full of player traps that will literally cause entire story beats to skip, for evidence gathering to completely get sidetracked or to literally be useless to your goal.”
- “Trusting means that you also answer the phone, but the call is skipped and not answering the call skips that entire storyline.”
- “The story seems to be extremely packed with hints of ideas that they had and wanted to develop, but just never actually bothered with.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
45%
33%
The gameplay is focused on decision-making rather than active mechanical interaction, offering around 1.5 to 2 hours of playtime. While some players appreciate the compelling and improved mechanics by the end, others find the map reset and limited interaction to be a restrictive or flawed element. Overall, the gameplay is generally seen as good but may not satisfy those seeking more dynamic action.
- “Plus, I really like the mechanics!”
- “But again, the story and the gameplay are compelling enough to make this an enjoyable game.”
- “The gameplay itself is intentionally limited, focusing on decision-making rather than mechanical interaction.”
- “For others, particularly those expecting more active gameplay, the lack of interaction may feel restrictive.”
- “Emphasis is on "all your playthroughs" for this game resets the map every time, making it just a superfluous detail that's essentially just a broken game mechanic.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Replayability in the game is mixed: while some appreciate the branching paths and multiple endings that encourage multiple playthroughs, others feel the core experience remains too similar, limiting the incentive to replay.
- “These decisions branch into multiple outcomes, creating a web of possibilities that encourages replayability.”
- “Replay value: ✅ good”
- “In terms of longevity, the game offers some replay value through its branching paths and multiple endings, but the core experience remains largely the same.”
- “It does not have any replay value (the story doesn't change enough to make me want to play it again), especially after just playing it.”
- “The games from Wales Interactive handle this much better, and it really adds to the replay value.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The game's optimization is generally good, delivering smooth performance suitable for its FMV style. However, as with many FMV titles, the overall experience depends heavily on strong performances and writing rather than technical prowess.
- “Performance: ✅ good”
- “I've seen better performances in high school plays.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The graphics are generally praised for their quality and concept, with impressive visuals. However, some users feel the art style lacks excitement and the game misses basic playable elements, suggesting a mixed reception overall.
- “Graphics: good”
- “The visuals are amazing and the concept is great.”
- “I don't think there is anything that could be done for the art style since the game is already done.”
- “Overall, the game lacks a lot of basic playable elements and art style.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players experienced strong emotional investment in the story and characters, though many felt the endings lacked a satisfying or worthwhile emotional payoff.
- “I got way too emotionally invested in what happens to her ”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor is noted for its ironic and relatable moments, especially in how it portrays characters pretending to be more important than they are, which some users found amusing.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is inconsistent, with glitches occurring during fast-forwarding events, including unresponsive choices and incorrect language displays. These issues can disrupt the gameplay experience.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the music to be quite basic and feel that the soundtracks could be improved for a more engaging experience.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Hacked: The Streamer

2h Median play time

2h Average play time

2-2h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Hacked: The Streamer

林葬屋前传：冥声

2025

Survival Role Playing

77%39reviews

Refate: Echoes of Desire

2025

Casual Role Playing

57%355reviews

I Saw Black Clouds

2021

Simulation

+14

Lost Spirits

Survival Survival

48%11reviews

Nothing To Remember

2021

Simulation

More games like Hacked: The Streamer

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Hacked: The Streamer is a open world role playing game with horror, drama, mystery, thriller and others themes.

Hacked: The Streamer is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, Windows and Xbox.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing Hacked: The Streamer.

Hacked: The Streamer was released on April 6, 2026.

Hacked: The Streamer was developed by NAISU.

Hacked: The Streamer has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Hacked: The Streamer for its story but disliked it for its gameplay.

Hacked: The Streamer is a single player game.

Similar games include 林葬屋前传：冥声, Refate: Echoes of Desire, I Saw Black Clouds, Lost Spirits, Nothing To Remember and others.

Hacked: The Streamer

Platforms

About

Buy Hacked: The Streamer