Glacier 3: The Meltdown

About

Glacier 3: The Meltdown is a single player racing game. It was developed by Team 6 Studios and was released on January 23, 2014. It received negative reviews from players.

"Glacier 3: The Meltdown" is a destructive racing game where players choose from an array of 8 powerful cars, each equipped with deadly weapons. Master the art of strategic weapon usage or prioritize speed to outpace opponents in various tracks. With improved weapons, new battle cars, and more interactive tracks, players will experience intense battles and races for victory and a hefty prize.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

26%

Audience ScoreBased on 200 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

graphics22 negative mentions

The chaotic blend of combat and racing can provide some entertaining moments, especially for those who enjoy arcade-style gameplay.
The game features a variety of tracks and vehicles, which can add some fun to the racing experience.
For players looking for a low-cost, silly racing game, it can be a source of amusement, particularly in a casual setting.

The controls are poorly designed, making vehicle handling frustrating and unpredictable, which detracts from the overall gameplay experience.
There is a lack of options for graphics and controls, with no tutorial or guidance on how to play, leaving players to figure things out on their own.
The graphics and audio design are dated and lack polish, contributing to an overall feeling of a rushed and unfinished product.

graphics
68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
58%
32%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized as outdated and poorly executed, with many reviewers noting that they resemble those of early PlayStation 2 or even earlier systems, despite the game being released in 2010. Users have pointed out the lack of graphical options, such as resolution settings and visual customizations, which further detracts from the experience. Overall, the visuals are described as muddy, laughable, and unacceptable for the era, making them a significant drawback for players.
- “The graphics are truly amazing!”
- “I love how customizable the graphics are!”
- “For a 2010 game, it has pretty good graphics.”
- “The graphics are hilariously bad even for its 2010 release date.”
- “The graphics are outdated, even for a game from 2010, and it's probably a really bad port from a Wii.”
- “The graphics look as if this game was a prototype for the PS2.”
story
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
70%
24%
The game's "story" aspect is widely criticized for lacking any actual narrative, with many players noting that the so-called "story mode" consists merely of a series of races without context or progression. Reviews indicate that the gameplay can be completed in under two hours, and the absence of a meaningful storyline leaves players feeling disappointed and unengaged. Overall, the game's attempt to incorporate a story is seen as a failed gimmick, leading to a frustrating experience for those seeking a narrative-driven adventure.
- “It has the best story I have ever seen in a game, the best combat, best characters, diverse enemies, and a huge, beautiful world full of secrets, all combined in one perfectly done game.”
- “The storyline is really enthralling!”
- “-story; gripping and intense”
- “The story mode starts a race with absolutely no story.”
- “The game has no story.”
- “Story mode is a joke because there is no story.”
music
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
63%
24%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with many players finding it either forgettable or outright annoying, often describing it as repetitive and lacking impact. While some tracks are noted as decent or energetic, the overall consensus is that the soundtrack fails to leave a lasting impression, and the limited options for sound customization further detract from the experience. Additionally, the sound effects, particularly engine noises, are criticized for being subpar, contributing to a generally negative perception of the audio design.
- “The soundtrack is amazing and the gameplay is nothing but top-level intensity.”
- “On the positive side, the music isn't too bad and the graphics look alright, like a GameCube era game with sharp graphics.”
- “This game is full of fun and awesome graphics mixed with the best song I've ever heard, yes, just one song!”
- “Engine sounds and weapon effects are present but lack punch, and the soundtrack, while energetic at times, fails to leave a lasting impression.”
- “Car sounds are quite bad, painfully so, and the rock music in the background half the time just grates on my nerves.”
- “The only lie not being sold here was the options as it was the correct plural of the use of the two very generous options e.g. how loud do you want your shit music or how quiet (the default is off) do you want your even worse sound fx.”
gameplay
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
65%
14%
The gameplay of "Glacier 3: The Meltdown" is widely criticized for its frustrating driving mechanics and imprecise targeting, leading to a lack of satisfaction in combat and racing experiences. Many reviewers noted that the physics system feels more like a hindrance than a feature, resulting in a dated and often chaotic gameplay experience that fails to deliver the intensity and enjoyment expected from a racing game. While some appreciated the soundtrack and the concept, the overall execution left players feeling disappointed and frustrated.
- “Soundtrack is amazing and the gameplay is nothing but top-level intensity.”
- “Once you get into actual gameplay, Glacier 3 really shows its colors.”
- “The gameplay is like Super Mario Kart where you race along picking up mystery boxes and try to shoot/bomb/ram the other competitors out of the way.”
- “Instead of the fluid rhythm found in stronger arcade racers, the moment-to-moment gameplay frequently feels like a struggle against the physics system itself.”
- “Weapon feedback lacks impact, and the targeting mechanics can be imprecise, making it unclear whether missed shots are due to player error or mechanical inconsistency.”
- “Considering the horrible production values, that make the game look way older than it actually is, Glacier 3 also fails in providing at least an enjoyable experience when played: the unbearable driving and shooting mechanics make for a frustrating and pointless experience as you trail behind AI-controlled cars with little hope of winning at least a race.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its intentionally poor graphics and absurd gameplay mechanics, leading to a comedic experience that some players find entertaining despite its simplicity and short playtime. The overall tone is reminiscent of a "so bad it's good" approach, making it a humorous choice for those seeking a lighthearted, trashy gaming experience, especially at a discounted price.
- “It's a funny game, but very easy; you can complete it in 30 minutes or less.”
- “Driving straight consists of 360s; it's quite funny.”
- “All in all, it is okay for a funny trash game, and if it is -75% off, then you can spend your money on this game. :p”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users emphasize that replayability is a crucial factor in determining a game's overall value, distinguishing between games that offer engaging experiences worth revisiting and those that do not.
- “There are two types of games: the ones that are playable and the ones that aren't.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to dive back in.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices makes replaying the game feel pointless.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game has been criticized for its outdated advertisements and lack of clarity in gameplay mechanics, leading to a frustrating user experience. Players feel that essential information is missing, which detracts from the overall enjoyment and value of the game.
- “The monetization system feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without constantly being bombarded by ads.”
- “I find the in-game purchases to be overpriced and not worth the value they provide, which really detracts from the overall experience.”
- “The constant push for microtransactions ruins the immersion, as it feels like the game is more focused on making money than providing a fun experience.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and bothersome, suggesting that while they typically enjoy unlocking content through gameplay, the repetitive nature of the grind detracts from their overall experience.
- “Normally I wouldn't mind unlocking stuff by playing the game, but when the game is that tedious, it's just bothersome.”
- “The grinding feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I find myself spending more time grinding than actually enjoying the gameplay, which is frustrating.”