Skip to main content
FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction Game Cover

About

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction is a single player and multiplayer racing game with a horror theme. It was developed by Team 6 Studios and was released on December 13, 2011. It received negative reviews from both critics and players.

"FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction" is a demolition racing game with intense action and real world physics. Race across 60 tracks while causing destruction in various environments, with 47 vehicles and 9 game modes available. Compete in online and offline options, including monster truck and stuntman modes, creating chaos and destruction along the way.

Skip User Reviews

20%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,620 reviews
humor47 positive mentions
graphics71 negative mentions

  • The game allows players to use their own music to override the game's soundtrack.
  • There is a wide variety of game modes and vehicles, providing some replayability.
  • Some players find the chaotic nature of the game amusing and entertaining, especially in multiplayer.
  • The driving mechanics are poor, with cars feeling slippery and unresponsive.
  • The graphics and overall presentation are subpar, looking worse than earlier entries in the series.
  • The AI is frustratingly bad, often targeting the player instead of competing against each other.
  • graphics
    212 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have been widely criticized as subpar, with many reviewers noting that they appear outdated even for its release year of 2011, often comparing them unfavorably to earlier titles in the FlatOut series. Users describe the visuals as muddy, poorly optimized, and reminiscent of early console games, leading to a frustrating experience marred by low frame rates and unappealing aesthetics. Overall, the consensus is that the graphics significantly detract from the gameplay, making it difficult for players to enjoy the game.

    • “The graphics are as exquisite and are worth the 10GB on my SSD.”
    • “Anywho, away from that tangent: this game is so incredibly beautiful, the imagery and graphics so picturesque and serene that I forget that I am simply playing a video game and not viewing gorgeous images of our magnificent earth.”
    • “Good graphics, a bunch of cars, different kinds of game types.”
    • “Never have I had such a terrible experience with a game like I have with this one. From the horrible car knockoffs to the dreadful graphics, not one aspect about this game is good. Speaking to a brick wall is more fun than this dumpster fire of what is called a 'video game'. I got awful FPS on a GPU that is 6 years newer than the game; how is that even possible?”
    • “The graphics are an eyesore, especially for 2013. It somehow looks worse than FlatOut 2 from 2006.”
    • “The graphics are terrible, especially for 2011 standards. Even the first FlatOut had better graphics.”
  • music
    147 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players noting the absence of a proper in-game soundtrack during races and criticizing the generic and uninspired menu music. While some appreciate the option to use their own music, this feature is often marred by bugs and inconsistencies, leading to frustration when custom tracks fail to play or result in crashes. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a significant downgrade from previous titles in the series, contributing to a lackluster audio experience.

    • “The soundtrack complements the fast-paced action perfectly, enhancing the overall immersive experience.”
    • “I could not help but mention the soundtrack which perfectly counters the gameplay, filling you with adrenaline when the action picks up, and the sorrow at the more dramatic parts.”
    • “The automatic soundtrack option in settings is to take music from your music folder.”
    • “Engine sounds lack depth, crashes lack impact, and the music—while energetic—can’t mask the game’s emptiness.”
    • “The soundtrack is so dark and mysterious which doesn't help with that fun part either.”
    • “There is no in-game music during racing - none.”
  • gameplay
    133 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Flatout 3 has been widely criticized for its poor mechanics, including slippery controls, unresponsive driving, and a lack of engaging gameplay elements. Many players noted that the game feels like a chaotic and unpolished experience, with numerous bugs and crashes that detract from the overall enjoyment. Despite a variety of game modes and vehicle options, the execution is seen as a significant downgrade from its predecessors, leaving players frustrated and disappointed.

    • “The expansive roster of vehicles provides a diverse range of choices, each with its own strengths and quirks, adding an extra layer of strategy to the gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is very smooth and the mechanics are glimmering with perfection.”
    • “Never have I run into an issue with gameplay, mechanics, nothing: this game is a gift from the gods, crafted for the sole purpose of displaying perfection and bliss within a video game.”
    • “The gameplay is atrocious, the cars feel like they have no weight, the tracks are badly designed.”
    • “The gameplay is poor to say the least.”
    • “The gameplay is outdated and stiff, the graphics are horrible, and the game contains a decent amount of bugs.”
  • humor
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in this game is largely derived from its numerous flaws, with players finding amusement in the broken physics, poor controls, and absurd situations that arise during gameplay. While many reviews highlight that the game is "so bad it's funny," the enjoyment often comes from playing with friends, as the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the game leads to hilarious moments. Despite its shortcomings, some players appreciate the retro charm and silliness, making it a source of laughter rather than frustration in a multiplayer setting.

    • “Weird feeling - at first I was ready to toss this game aside at any moment, but it started to win me over a little bit, with the sheer amount of absolutely hilarious stuff happening basically every race.”
    • “This is like one of those poorly made N64 games that you and your friends play out of boredom, but you end up pissing yourselves laughing at each other for the stupid decisions that you did not intend to make.”
    • “There's enough silly things the engine can do, between using a tank and a double-decker bus pile-up, that it's worth laughing at with some friends.”
    • “You're not funny!”
    • “Wide is not funny in this case...”
  • story
    31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews present a mixed perspective on the game's story, with some praising its engaging narrative filled with tension and character depth, while others criticize the lack of a coherent plot or meaningful storytelling. Many players noted the presence of unique character backstories, but some felt these were overshadowed by poor game mechanics and unbalanced gameplay. Overall, the story aspect appears to be a significant point of contention, with opinions ranging from highly positive to completely dismissive.

    • “The story is engaging, filled with tension and twists that will keep you on the edge of your seat, wanting to know what happens next!!!”
    • “The game starts in a way that perfectly builds the atmosphere; the sudden title screen shows there is no padding throughout the story (and like a Telltale game, your choices matter). The lack of an icon on the taskbar may scare you into thinking it's malware; however, this is subtly foreshadowing how this game will make you feel raw emotion.”
    • “Finally, it is worth mentioning that this game features one of the most undeniably prodigious stories I have ever played in my life.”
    • “The only thing I see effort put into is the cameo characters and their backstory, which is completely pointless.”
    • “There is no real storyline that is apparent or obvious, and the AI is pretty terrible as well.”
    • “There’s absolutely no storyline, but there are several game modes.”
  • optimization
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues such as stuttering, frame drops, and crashes, making it difficult to enjoy the gameplay. While some users experienced stable performance, the general consensus highlights that the game is poorly optimized, with outdated graphics and inconsistent performance across different systems. Overall, the optimization problems significantly detract from the overall experience, overshadowing any potential enjoyment from the gameplay.

    • “I noticed that there's a really significant difference between cars when it comes to handling and performance.”
    • “Yet gameplay aside, in-game technical performance was actually fairly acceptable.”
    • “Performance-wise it runs stable and smooth for me, although I have heard of people experiencing frequent crashes.”
    • “It's 11 years old now and the visuals are badly dated, and there's optimization problems as I experienced stuttering every 10 seconds or so, making the game somewhat unplayable.”
    • “This game is terribly optimized, and it's certainly not a worthy successor of the FlatOut series.”
    • “Nothing makes sense, the game is horribly optimized, the camera swings about wildly and it still looks generally horrible.”
  • stability
    23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game is overwhelmingly criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and freezing issues that severely impact gameplay. Many describe the controls as janky and the overall experience as frustrating, likening it to a poorly executed mobile game. While a few players found humor in the glitches, the consensus is that the game is a "buggy mess" that is barely playable.

    • “It's pretty buggy and runs like dirt.”
    • “Expecting something at least halfway decent, I got a buggy, crashing, and barely playable pile of mess dumped upon me.”
    • “Game is a buggy mess and physics are terrible.”
  • replayability
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is mixed; while some players appreciate the variety of enjoyable game modes and multiplayer options that enhance replay value, others criticize the lack of incentive to revisit the game, citing poor quality and limited replayable content. Overall, the experience varies significantly among players, with some finding it engaging and others feeling it lacks depth.

    • “There is a large variety of game modes that one may find enjoyable, and that adds a lot of replayable content.”
    • “Multiplayer modes contribute significantly to the game's replay value.”
    • “Endless replay value.”
    • “Replayability: there is no reason to even look at this game again, not only because of how terrible it is, but also because there is no incentive, like, really!”
    • “☑️ 404 - replayability not found”
    • “❌ time trial for replay value”
  • monetization
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many reviewers expressing disappointment over its reliance on the FlatOut name without delivering quality gameplay. While some appreciate the absence of microtransactions, the overall sentiment is that the game serves primarily as an advertisement for another title, leaving players feeling exploited and dissatisfied.

    • “No microtransactions, thank you!”
    • “The DLC policy is fair and adds value to the game without being intrusive.”
    • “I appreciate that the game doesn't pressure players into spending more money.”
    • “Blatant cash grab.”
    • “This game is nothing more than a cynical cash grab from Strategy First to profit from the FlatOut name along with the technical incompetence of Team6 Games in developing this sorry excuse for a game. It can be safely said that the FlatOut we know and love is now too badly damaged that there is little hope that it can be brought back.”
    • “Get FlatOut: Ultimate Carnage instead; this is just a waste of money, as it is a cash grab by the publisher on the name of FlatOut only. Bugbear wasn't even involved with this pile of garbage.”
  • emotional
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of the game elicits a strong response, with players experiencing a mix of heart-wrenching storytelling and subtle world-building that fosters a sense of connection and loneliness. While some found it deeply moving, others felt overwhelmed and frustrated, leading to a desire to disengage from the experience altogether. Overall, the game successfully provokes a range of emotions, from empathy to frustration.

    • “At least it made me feel something again.”
    • “Where do I even start: the graphics, used sparingly but effectively; the music, ominously absent; the story, heart-wrenching and I yet couldn't look away; the open world, some of the best and most subtle world building in gaming history.”
    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized exactly what was at stake.”
  • atmosphere
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of FlatOut 3 has been widely criticized for failing to capture the competitive spirit and engaging mechanics of its predecessors, instead feeling like a poorly executed fan-fiction. Reviewers note that the game evokes a sense of raw emotion but ultimately presents a depressing and mediocre experience, lacking the vibrant energy typical of arcade racing games. Many suggest that a complete overhaul is necessary to improve the game's atmosphere, which is currently marred by bugs and uninspired design elements.

    • “The game starts in a way that perfectly builds the atmosphere; the sudden title screen shows there is no padding throughout the story (and like a Telltale game, your choices matter). The lack of an icon on the taskbar may scare you into thinking it's malware; however, this is subtly foreshadowing how this game will make you feel raw emotion.”
    • “It captures the atmosphere of FlatOut but overall just feels like a cheap, mediocre mobile racing game that double dipped into the stock sound effects archive.”
    • “I struggle to see how this is even related to FlatOut, other than feeling like a fan-fiction made by borrowing elements of the prior games without capturing the true game mechanics and atmosphere.”
    • “Unlike other arcade racing games, FlatOut 3 fails to inspire a competitive atmosphere.”
    • “If they want to save the game (I don't think they will mostly because they changed the studio), they need to completely remake the game. It has so many bugs, and they also need to change the atmosphere; it is just depressing, even with the music and colors.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding in the game to be excessively tedious and unenjoyable, often describing it as monotonous and rage-inducing. Many feel that the effort put into the game has resulted in a frustrating experience, leading to a general consensus that it falls short compared to its predecessor.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Team 6 really put an effort into this game; unfortunately, that effort was to make the game as unenjoyable, mundane, unsatisfactory, monotonous, tedious, and lastly rage-inducing (at having to pay a price for such disk clutter).”
    • “And now... for the long and tedious negative list... I could probably just sum it up to: 'it sucks!', but I will mention just a few of the downgrades (in comparison to its predecessor, it seems lesser of a game) and downfalls of the game.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game has been widely criticized, with reviewers highlighting poor character design that is described as cringy, demonic, and creepy. Overall, the lack of depth and coherence in character portrayal contributes to a negative perception of the game's overall quality.

    • “The character designs are demonic, crazy, weird, and creepy.”
    • “The character development is lacking, with poorly designed characters that detract from the overall experience.”
    • “The game features cringy character designs that feel out of place and poorly executed.”
Skip Critic Reviews

10%Critics’ scoreBased on 1 critic reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction

61h Median play time
101h Average play time
4-229h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 5 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction

Games Like FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction

Flatout 4: Total Insanity Image
DIRT 5 Image
Need for Speed Unbound Image
Ridge Racer Unbounded Image
TRAIL OUT Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction is a racing game with horror theme.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 101 hours playing FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction was released on December 13, 2011.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction was developed by Team 6 Studios.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction has received negative reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its graphics.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Flatout 4: Total Insanity, DIRT 5, Need for Speed Unbound, Ridge Racer Unbounded, TRAIL OUT and others.