Gimmick! 2

About

"Gimmick! 2" follows Yumetaro, a green yokai, on a new quest with improved physics for his powerful star tool. This tool allows for bouncing, defending, and even riding, while the game features a challenging mode and a legendary soundtrack by composer David Wise. Assistance options are available for a more accessible experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

83%

Audience ScoreBased on 47 reviews

gameplay10 positive mentions

grinding2 negative mentions

The game features enjoyable gameplay with a well-executed star mechanic that encourages experimentation and creativity in solving puzzles.
The level design is praised for its variety and challenge, with many secret areas that provide rewarding experiences for players who enjoy exploration.
The graphics are colorful and charming, and the game maintains a fun, cute aesthetic that appeals to fans of platformers.

Many players feel that the game lacks the unique charm and creativity of the original Gimmick!, with some levels feeling overly long and repetitive.
The soundtrack is considered underwhelming and fails to capture the energetic spirit of the original, leading to a less engaging audio experience.
Some mechanics, such as the star recall feature and level design choices, have been criticized for creating frustrating gameplay moments that detract from the overall experience.

gameplay
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
62%
9%
The gameplay is centered around a unique star mechanic that serves both as an attack and a platform, offering versatile and satisfying mechanics that enhance puzzle-solving and level design. While the sequel builds on the original's foundation, it emphasizes the star's utility more effectively, though some players find the new star recall mechanic frustrating. Overall, the game is praised for its enjoyable physics, challenging platforming, and the depth of its mechanics, despite some criticisms regarding visual presentation and the balance of level design.
- “The star mechanic is probably one of the most unique ideas I've ever seen in a platformer.”
- “The star from the original gains a much greater focus by having it activate star switches you need to throw it into; the game does a really great job making the most out of this mechanic by having it interact with a bunch of the stage elements.”
- “Solving these complex platforming puzzles and then executing on their mechanical challenge is deeply satisfying in a way that 2D platformers can rarely manage.”
- “The star recall mechanic is absolutely miserable, often resulting in cancelling stars you needed to keep.”
- “I don't really want to get into the rest of the gameplay and design issues because they're just a huge letdown (star cancelling???).”
- “The game focuses on really wringing all the value out of its platforming mechanics over a long stretch, but this longer form level design can make the novelty and new ideas feel sparse.”
music
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
53%
9%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that it lacks the energetic and memorable qualities of the original soundtrack. While some appreciate the remixes and the atmospheric quality of the new tracks, others find them too ambient and unremarkable, failing to complement the gameplay effectively. Overall, while the quality of the music is acknowledged, it is often seen as a disappointing departure from the upbeat and dynamic style that fans expected.
- “As legendary as David Wise is, the music for the game is really ambient, atmospheric, and relaxing; which is nothing like the original where the music was very upbeat, melodic, and complemented the hecticness and dynamic gameplay.”
- “The music is fantastic too: you can tell David Wise was on the team.”
- “The art is beautiful and the sound and music by legendary composer David Wise is fantastic.”
- “Aside from the excellent remixes of some of the original music tracks, I'm disappointed that none of the music really stood out and was more ambient instead of action-packed.”
- “There's a few times where they do remix music from gimmick 1 (the intro did make me smile), but having these songs here honestly detracts from the game by just showing how boring the rest of the soundtrack is.”
- “The music is passable, but why this?”
graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
47%
20%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the colorful and visually pleasing aesthetic, while others criticize the art style as uninspired and reminiscent of cheap mobile games. Fans of the original express disappointment over the departure from its unique character, feeling that the sequel lacks the charm and cohesion of its predecessor. Overall, while the visuals are generally deemed good, they fail to resonate with all players, leading to a polarized reception.
- “The graphics are good, and they somehow managed to make the ohagis adorable!”
- “I understand why fans of the original don't dig the art style change, but I don't think that's a good reason to immediately dismiss this game. What they went with is still good and visually pleasing.”
- “Adding onto this, I don't have too much to say about the visuals; they look colorful and nice and they do their job well.”
- “The art style is horrible.”
- “Another huge shame in my opinion is the art style they've chosen to go with here.”
- “It bewilders me that a Famicom game released in 1992 with graphics by a single person has more character than this.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the star switch puzzles to be tedious and repetitive, particularly due to the lengthy levels, which detracts from the overall challenge and enjoyment compared to the original game.
- “The star switch puzzles are simple and creative, but they become tedious and repetitive when you realize how egregiously long the levels are.”
- “The original game didn't have anything like this and still managed to be challenging in its own way without the tediousness.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's story is perceived as lacking depth and cohesion, with boss fights feeling disconnected and the overall narrative appearing to be an afterthought.
- “The boss fights are much less organic, the world isn't as cohesive, and the game's story feels like an afterthought.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's atmosphere is characterized by ambient and relaxing music, a departure from the original's upbeat and melodic score that matched its dynamic gameplay. This shift creates a more tranquil experience, contrasting with the previous energetic tone.
- “The music for the game is incredibly ambient, atmospheric, and relaxing, creating a stark contrast to the original, which featured upbeat and melodic tunes that complemented the hectic and dynamic gameplay.”
- “The atmosphere in this game is immersive and captivating, drawing players into its world with every detail.”
- “Every element of the environment contributes to a rich and engaging atmosphere that enhances the overall gaming experience.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers express that "gimmick 2" significantly detracts from the emotional depth of the game, leading to a sense of heartbreak over missed opportunities for genuine connection and impact.
- “I cannot emphasize enough that 'Gimmick 2' is as close as you can get to missing the point, and that is heartbreaking.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Players appreciate the inclusion of cosmetics, which enhance the game's replayability by providing additional incentives to revisit and engage with the content.
- “The cosmetics are a neat addition that adds some replay value.”
- “The variety of choices in gameplay keeps me coming back for more.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the different paths and outcomes available.”
- “The game lacks meaningful choices, making it hard to find reasons to replay it.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to dive back in.”
- “The limited variety in gameplay mechanics means that replaying feels more like a chore than a fun experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy of the game is generally viewed positively, with users emphasizing that it does not feel exploitative or like a cash grab.
- “The monetization system feels overly aggressive and detracts from the overall experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game fully without spending extra money.”
- “The constant push for in-game purchases makes it feel like the developers care more about profit than player satisfaction.”