Skip to main content
Front War: Survival Game Cover

About

Front War: Survival is a single player strategy game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Strengthen yourself and break through the siege

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

77%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,033 reviews
gameplay4 positive mentions
monetization30 negative mentions

  • The game looks like the ads and is fun to play.
  • Graphics are nice and the gameplay is engaging.
  • It's easy to learn and progress without spending money.
  • The game is a knock-off of State of Survival with many events missing.
  • There are numerous bugs and issues with customer support.
  • Gameplay is often interrupted by a long tutorial and constant notifications.
  • monetization
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the gameplay. While some users appreciate the lack of intrusive ads, others criticize the game for having fake ads and a disconnect between the advertised content and the actual experience. Overall, the sentiment leans towards dissatisfaction with the advertising practices, despite some players enjoying the game itself.

    • “No ads.”
    • “On the bright side, there were no ads that I can remember.”
    • “Great game, best of all, no ads.”
    • “Every ad for this game is completely different from the actual game itself. I downloaded it a long time ago and deleted it as fast as I downloaded it... complete fake.”
    • “Absolutely nothing like the ads.”
    • “Game does not match advertising.”
  • gameplay
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing it for being unfair and janky, particularly due to limited event access that gives some players an advantage. While some appreciate the graphics and animations, others find the mechanics outdated and repetitive, often feeling that the gameplay is bogged down by excessive management tasks and interruptions. Overall, while there are elements of enjoyment, significant optimization and innovation are needed to enhance the experience.

    • “The gameplay is good but needs optimization.”
    • “Gameplay is similar to other games but this has awesome animation and graphics!”
    • “I'm impressed with the characters and gameplay.”
    • “Creators only release events to some players, not all, giving those who have access to the event the ability to obtain stronger heroes that others cannot obtain, giving those players an unfair advantage in gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is pretty janky and basic.”
    • “Another game where you spend 80% of your time managing and building/upgrading your structures, collecting resources within your settlement, then 20% gameplay as shown on the screenshot.”
  • graphics
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the colorful visuals, character design, and animations as excellent and entertaining. However, some criticize the graphics as mediocre or outdated, noting a lack of variety in zombie designs and comparing it unfavorably to other games with better graphics and content. Overall, while the game features appealing aesthetics, opinions vary on its graphical quality and originality.

    • “I like the colorful visuals, the awesome challenges, and dimension of this game.”
    • “Gameplay is similar to other games but this has awesome animation and graphics!”
    • “A fun game with excellent graphics.”
    • “Most of the zombie graphics are the same, more or less.”
    • “I've seen games with a lot more content or better graphics that use less storage space.”
    • “Outdated mechanics with mediocre graphics.”
  • story
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it boring and unnecessary, while others appreciate its progression and engaging elements. Technical issues, such as mission icons not functioning and inability to access certain missions, have frustrated users, detracting from their overall experience. Overall, while some players enjoy the narrative, many express dissatisfaction with its execution and the accompanying gameplay mechanics.

    • “A storyline worth investing in, smooth controls, tactical, and most importantly; good ol' fashioned shoot 'em up fun.”
    • “Same format as a lot of these survivor-type games, but any game that has a 'save the dog' mission as its first main job gets my vote.”
    • “Great game story keeps moving; hope it stays that way.”
    • “Also, omg the storyline is boring and unnecessary.”
    • “I downloaded this to shoot stuff, not to play SimCity or have to read the same plot BS every mobile game has.”
    • “And end to play this game because it is a waste of time to play this app if you can't even get the growth mission rewards.”
  • stability
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is severely compromised, with users reporting frequent glitches, freezes, and crashes that hinder gameplay. Many players express frustration over poor coding and ineffective customer service, leading to a consistently unstable experience that detracts from enjoyment. Overall, the game's performance issues are a significant barrier to playability.

    • “But, too many issues and glitches; customer service is useless.”
    • “Very poor coding; on a Samsung flagship smartphone, I experience 15 fps with freezes and breakups every 3-5 seconds.”
    • “The game freezes within 1 minute of opening.”
  • optimization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from significant optimization issues on mobile devices, leading to stuttering gameplay and excessive strain on hardware. While the gameplay itself is enjoyable, many users express frustration with the lack of optimization, prompting some to uninstall the game.

    • “The gameplay is good but needs optimization.”
    • “The game is not optimized for mobile devices.”
    • “What a wasteful experience to strain my phone's hardware; uninstalling this unoptimized program!”
    • “The gameplay keeps stuttering.”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the humor in the game particularly enjoyable, noting that while the initial login is satisfactory, the subsequent experiences from the second to seventh login are especially hilarious. Overall, the comedic elements contribute positively to the game's appeal.

    • “The first login is fine, but the humor really kicks in from the second to the seventh login, and it's hilarious to see.”
    • “Absolutely funny!”
  • grinding
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, comparing it unfavorably to "State of Survival" and highlighting issues such as server similarities and the potential for losing progress. The gameplay is described as repetitive, focusing on troop marching and base building, which some feel leads to a lack of originality and excessive reliance on in-game purchases.

    • “If you want to play a game like this, get State of Survival. This is a knockoff that runs on the same servers. I just lost almost two weeks of grinding because I was playing this while my alliance mates were playing SOS. Don't do it!”
    • “Troop marching, base building, dime-a-dozen game... whale farming.”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game has been criticized for lacking originality, with designs and traits appearing to be borrowed from other survival zombie games, such as State of Survival. This has led to a perception of unoriginality and a lack of depth in character progression.

    • “The character designs feel like they were stolen from other survival zombie games, like State of Survival.”
    • “Character development is shallow and lacks meaningful progression.”
    • “The characters are one-dimensional and fail to evoke any emotional connection.”
  • music
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has been criticized for being excessively loud and annoying, detracting from the overall experience.

    • “The music is so annoyingly loud.”
    • “The soundtrack is repetitive and lacks variety.”
    • “The music doesn't fit the game's atmosphere at all.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Front War: Survival

1h Median play time
1h Average play time
1-1h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Front War: Survival is a strategy game.

Front War: Survival is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

On average players spend around 1 hours playing Front War: Survival.

Front War: Survival was developed by Puzala.

Front War: Survival has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Front War: Survival for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Front War: Survival is a single player game.