Farming World
- May 1, 2014
- Excalibur
Get on SteamFarming World is a single-player strategy game that allows you to build and manage your own farm, choosing to specialize in crops like grain or fruits, and maintaining your own dairy farm. Expand your farm by purchasing or renting land, and construct roads for vehicle navigation. Manage and adapt your business as you stock up on produce and sell when demand is high, while maintaining and maintaining your land in this farming simulator PC game.
Mac OS
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers a simple and relaxing farming experience, appealing to fans of casual simulation games.
- There is a good variety of crops and products to manage, providing some depth to the gameplay.
- The 2D graphics style is appreciated by some players as a refreshing change from more cartoonish farm sims.
- The game suffers from numerous bugs and crashes, making it frustrating and often unplayable.
- The tutorial is ineffective and does not adequately teach players how to navigate the game, leading to confusion.
- Gameplay is repetitive and lacks depth, with many players finding it boring and uninspired.
- grinding43 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The grinding aspect of "Farming World" is often described as tedious and overly simplistic, with many players finding the farming mechanics too easy and lacking depth. While some appreciate the casual approach and the focus on planning and timing, others criticize the game for being buggy, overpriced, and reminiscent of less engaging Facebook games. Overall, it offers a straightforward experience but may not satisfy those seeking a more challenging farming simulation.
“There are better free games or farming simulations in existence, why waste your time on something this uninspired?”
“The gameplay is okay, but it's quite buggy and laggy; personally, I am a big fan of sim/farming games, but this one is totally overpriced and looks like those Facebook games converted into PC games.”
“Tedious, tedious, tedious.”
- gameplay32 mentions
- 6 % positive mentions
- 75 % neutral mentions
- 19 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being repetitive, dull, and lacking depth, with many reviewers noting its unfinished mechanics and clunky user interface. Players find the experience unsatisfying, often reduced to simple tasks like waiting for crops to grow without meaningful engagement or goals. While some appreciate the smooth performance and graphics, the overall consensus is that the gameplay feels more like a low-quality mobile game than a polished PC title.
“Haven't had any glitches or problems, seems to run quite smooth and has nice graphics that are quite pleasing for this type of gameplay.”
“The gameplay is pretty straightforward, going away from the 'driving farming machinery' approach that some current simulators take and focusing on timing the planting according to the season and planning when to sell the crops.”
“Gameplay is repetitive, boring, and unsatisfying.”
“The UI is clunky and unintuitive, the gameplay is dull at best, and overall it feels like an unfinished game.”
“Gameplay consists of designating land for specific crops, punching buttons to get someone else to drive the tractor and do all the work, and then hitting fast forward for several days in a row until it's time to punch the next button.”
- graphics24 mentions
- 17 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many users describing them as outdated and reminiscent of early 1990s simulators, featuring poor animations and minor glitches. While some appreciate the simple and realistic 2D style as a refreshing change from cartoonish farm sims, others find the overall visual quality subpar and lacking in detail. Overall, the graphics may appeal to genre fans, but they are generally considered a weak point of the game.
“And the simple and realistic style of 2D graphics in this game makes a good escape from all those cartoony looking farm sims, something I've looked for and haven't seen elsewhere.”
“Haven't had any glitches or problems, seems to run quite smooth and has nice graphics that are quite pleasing for this type of gameplay.”
“I would recommend this if you are already a fan of the genre or if you don't mind the simple graphics.”
“Graphics: dated, poor animations.”
“The graphics are extremely subpar; the tutorial left me lacking for how to do things, which come to find out you can't even turn the buildings.”
“1990's graphics, no way to adjust screen resolution, miniature text.”
- stability14 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players reporting a smooth experience and pleasing graphics, while others have encountered significant bugs, lag, and error codes since launch. Overall, many users feel the game is overpriced given its stability issues.
“Buggy from day 1.”
“Error codes...followed the troubleshooting, but alas...nada.”
“This game is overpriced, buggy, laggy, and lacks work.”
- music10 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 40 % neutral mentions
- 60 % negative mentions
The music in the game has been widely criticized for being monotonous and repetitive, with many users expressing disappointment in its simplistic and uninspired nature. Reviewers noted that the background tracks often loop every few seconds, leading to a frustrating listening experience. Overall, the music received very low ratings, indicating a significant area for improvement.
“The music is monotonous after a while.”
“Music is horrendous, repeats every 5 seconds... simple tone like an old home phone ring.”
“The background music is lame and repetitive.”
- story2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game revolves around "contracts" that involve completing missions to supply products within a set timeframe; however, players have noted a significant flaw as the button to finalize these contracts is missing, hindering progression.
- replayability2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game has been rated poorly in terms of replayability, with multiple users giving it a score of 3 out of 10, indicating limited incentive to play it again after the initial experience.
“Replayable 3/10”
“Replayable 3/10”
