Factoid

About

Factoid is a single player simulation game. It received positive reviews from players.

Learn facts and boost your IQ in this idle incremental game!

Genres & Tags

Simulation

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 232 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

monetization16 negative mentions

The game is a fun and relaxing idle experience, similar to Spark, with interesting trivia facts that enhance gameplay.
There are no intrusive ads, and players appreciate the option to watch ads for bonuses without being forced to do so.
The game is well-designed and allows for casual play, making it easy to pick up and enjoy at any time.

Many players have reported issues with the ad boost feature not working properly, leading to frustration and wasted time.
There are several spelling errors and vague wording in the trivia facts, which detracts from the overall experience.
Some users have experienced game-breaking bugs, such as progress resetting to NaN, making the game unplayable after reaching certain milestones.

monetization
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
84%
The monetization model of the game is primarily ad-based, with optional ads for bonuses that do not interrupt gameplay. Players appreciate that there are no in-app purchases or forced ads, although some express a desire for a paid option to remove ads entirely. Overall, the approach is seen as non-intrusive and well-executed, enhancing the gaming experience without feeling exploitative.
- “This is an idle game; it has no fluff, no in-app purchases, and no way for you to feel like you're not progressing because you don't have money.”
- “No in-app purchases, like Spark.”
- “No ads are ever forced on you.”
- “I have watched probably 10 ads now, but a malfunction occurs after closing the ad and the game closes. When I open the game again, the 2x timer is not running.”
- “No way to pay money to remove ads.”
- “Very addicting and fun, but I wish you didn't have to watch 12 ads just to get a multiplier.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The story aspect of the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its engaging narrative and interesting elements. However, some users express frustration over the slow progression in unlocking new story content and the inability to revisit previously unlocked storylines. Overall, the storyline adds a polished layer to the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.
- “It has similar gameplay but is polished up, with more of a storyline.”
- “Nice straightforward idle/incremental game with fun visuals and a neat storyline.”
- “I like all the interesting bits that pop up; I really loved Spark and I really like the basis behind the story on this one too.”
- “It's also very difficult after a few days to unlock new story, which is the same problem I had with your other game.”
- “I end up repeating the same story points and waiting to get to prestige multiple times.”
- “Good, I wish I could go back and read through the storylines I have unlocked though.”
gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The gameplay is generally well-received, featuring polished mechanics and an engaging storyline that enhances the experience. While it retains similarities to its predecessor, some users noted issues such as typos, ambiguous leveling mechanics, and a lack of screen navigation options. Overall, it is praised for its quality and pacing, particularly appealing to fans of idle games.
- “Quality incremental game with a good pace and interesting mechanics!”
- “Amazing gameplay, definitely recommended if you are an idle game fan.”
- “Still, the factoid is enjoyable and I plan on playing it through to the end. However, there are a few points to improve upon: some typos in the facts listed break continuity, ambiguity in leveling mechanics, and nerfed controls. I also miss the option to scroll to different screens as opposed to key selection requirements.”
- “The same mechanics as the previous game.”
- “It has similar gameplay but is polished up, with more of a storyline.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The reviews highlight a mixed reception regarding the music aspect of the game; while some players appreciate the option to play their own music, others find the absence of any in-game music or sound effects to be dull and lacking. Suggestions for improvement include adding a royalty-free sci-fi themed soundtrack to enhance the experience.
- “Came from Spark, and both games with the simplistic design allow me to put on my own music (lofi hip hop or similar recommended) and spend a few minutes watching numbers rise.”
- “If I could add one thing to the game, it would be a nice royalty-free music background that was sci-fi themed.”
- “No music, no sound, nothing.”
- “Also, no music makes it dull.”
- “I did spot a typo: Chris Hadfield's name is misspelled when mentioning his music album that has clips from when he was in space.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The graphics in this game are an improvement over its predecessor, Spark, featuring fun visuals that enhance the overall experience. While the visuals are enjoyable, some users find Spark's graphics to be more readable. Overall, the game's graphics contribute positively to its straightforward idle/incremental gameplay and engaging storyline.
- “Just like your first game Spark (which I finished a few years ago), but with better graphics.”
- “Nice straightforward idle/incremental game with fun visuals and a neat storyline.”
- “I love this as much as Spark, though Spark's graphics are a bit more readable.”
- “The graphics are outdated and lack the polish expected from a modern game.”
- “Character models look flat and lifeless, making it hard to get immersed in the game.”
- “The environments are bland and repetitive, failing to capture the imagination.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as consistent with its predecessor, maintaining a light-hearted and amusing tone that adds to its charm. Players appreciate the comedic elements, which contribute to the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “I've played Spark for over a year now, sometimes deleting it and starting over again. It's just a little game to keep in your back pocket, I guess, but this is a bigger, broader reboot, and it's kind of funny in the same way that Spark was.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, often requiring significant effort to achieve desired outcomes, such as reaching a five-star rating.
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I find myself repeating the same tasks over and over, which really drains the fun out of the experience.”
- “The amount of grinding required to progress is overwhelming and takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”