Eternal Quest
- August 26, 2021
- Xtreaming
![Eternal Quest Game Cover](https://img.gamebrain.co/games/341/eternal_quest_2d_mmorpg_xtreaming_2021_28_xl.jpg)
MMORPG with fast gameplay, open world, PVP, BOSS, quests, craft, skins and more.
Reviews
- The game has a small but awesome community of gamers.
- Some players find the game enjoyable and fun, especially for those who like grinding and world bosses.
- It has potential for improvement and is considered by some as a decent 2D MMORPG.
- The game is plagued by security risks, including malware detection and account bans without evidence.
- It features a heavy pay-to-win model with numerous cash shop items that enhance gameplay, making it frustrating for free-to-play users.
- Many players report game-breaking bugs, poor graphics, and a lack of guidance, leading to a tedious and unbalanced experience.
- grinding6 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with players noting it can be tedious and requires significant solo effort unless assisted by others. While some players find the auto-attack feature and cash shop items facilitate efficient AFK farming, the overall experience is marred by poor graphics, clunky gameplay, and unengaging quests, leading to a lack of recommendation from reviewers.
“Though it is very grindy, as a warning.”
“Unless you get carried to higher levels by players, you are stuck grinding on your own.”
“The quests are rather obnoxious and tedious; overall, I wouldn't suggest it to anyone.”
- story4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
The game's story is criticized for its generic and tedious quests, which lack creativity and fail to engage players. Many users found the narrative elements uninspired, with rewards that do not align with character classes, contributing to an overall negative experience.
“The quests are so bland.”
“Also, items, shops, quests, etc. are extremely generic.”
“I got chests as rewards from quests and they all gave me items that weren't even for my class.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 150 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is characterized by straightforward mechanics but quickly reveals a pay-to-win structure that detracts from the experience, making it feel more like a mobile game than a true RPG. Players often find themselves engaged in excessive walking, leading to a sense of monotony unless they invest additional money to enhance their experience.
“The mechanics are pretty straightforward.”
“The gameplay is incredibly engaging and keeps you on your toes.”
“I love how the controls feel responsive and intuitive.”
“This game seems okay at the start, but after you progress, you can see how everything forces you to pay to win. It's like most free games: to get better, you have to buy this, buy a teleporter, buy inventory, and increase your warehouse. It's just another mobile game trying to be a 'PC' game. There's a lot of walking, and you feel like you're playing a walking simulator plus RPG. If you don't want to throw 40€+ into this game, you'll experience 'quality gameplay'; otherwise, it's just a lot of walking and boring time.”
- graphics2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are widely criticized as very poor, described as clunky and subpar even for a low-budget indie pixel art title. Reviewers noted issues with the game's visual layout and overall presentation, contributing to a negative gaming experience.
“The game has very, very bad graphics; it's very clunky, and the world has a pretty bad layout. Overall, I wouldn't suggest it to anyone.”
“The map isn't working, enemies aren't hurting me, and the game has bad sound and graphics even for a low-budget indie pixel art game.”