Dragonstone Wars

Skip User Reviews

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 46 reviews

gameplay2 positive mentions

stability2 negative mentions

Smooth and enjoyable base building mechanics, some consider it the best of its kind on mobile.
Battles are smooth with generally good gameplay balance, making free-to-play viable.
Graphics and character design are good, providing a pleasant visual experience.

Frequent connection issues and server maintenance disrupt gameplay and cause login problems.
Incomplete translation and UI elements in Chinese make the game difficult for non-Chinese speakers to understand.
Numerous bugs including invisible units during combat, crashes, and resource acquisition difficulties reduce playability.

gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The gameplay is notably better and more engaging than similar games like ROX or CoC, showing clear developer effort. However, some players criticize it for incorporating pay-to-win mechanics.
- “The devs spent time on the gameplay and it shows.”
- “The gameplay is much more awesome than others, like RoK or CoC.”
- “Another poor castle builder steeped in pay-to-win mechanics.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, including frequent bugs like invisible units during combat and unexpected disconnections requiring reconnection. It is highly unoptimized, with many glitches unresolved at release.
- “Extremely buggy; anytime my units enter combat, they turn invisible along with the enemies, and often the game automatically disconnects me requiring a reconnect.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics are consistently praised for being good, with well-designed characters and an appealing visual style. Additionally, the game's freedom to build anywhere enhances the overall visual experience.
- “Graphics and character design are good, and the game offers great freedom to build wherever we want.”
- “The graphics are good and enhance the fun of the game.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's monetization feels rushed and primarily focused on extracting money quickly, giving the impression of a cash grab rather than a thoughtfully designed system.
- “It's clear this game was made quickly and in an attempt to be a quick cash grab.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the campaign is noted for being silly and parody-like, likened to a "How to Train Your Dragon" spoof. However, the comedic value is undercut by the gameplay, which is criticized for being overly simplistic and unengaging.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is poorly optimized, with persistent bugs and glitches left unfixed before release. Additionally, it heavily relies on pay-to-win mechanics, undermining the free-to-play appeal.
- “Pay-to-win trash that's highly unoptimized, didn't fix any of the bugs and glitches before release. Don't let the pictures and description fool you, nothing is free in mobile gaming.”