Deadly 30

About

Deadly 30 is a single player survival shooter game with a horror theme. It was developed by Ignatus Zuk and Gonzalo Villagomez and was released on January 8, 2014. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Deadly 30" is a post-apocalyptic survival defense game. Fight off hordes of relentless zombies across 30 days and nights using various weapons and upgrades. Defend your base, manage your resources, and keep your squad alive to survive the zombie onslaught.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,129 reviews

gameplay50 positive mentions

optimization16 negative mentions

The game features charming artwork and a humorous storyline that adds to the overall experience.
Gameplay is addictive and offers a fair challenge, with a good mix of scavenging and base defense mechanics.
The ability to switch between three characters with unique weapons adds variety to the gameplay.

The game suffers from significant lag and performance issues, especially during intense zombie waves.
AI teammates are often unhelpful and can lead to frustrating situations where they die easily.
The game lacks multiplayer options, which could have enhanced the experience and replayability.

gameplay
200 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
58%
17%
The gameplay of "Deadly 30" features a repetitive loop of scavenging during the day and defending against zombies at night, which some players find enjoyable and addictive, while others criticize it for being overly simplistic and monotonous. Despite its charming art style and solid mechanics, many reviews highlight severe performance issues and a lack of depth, leading to frustration and a diminished sense of replayability. Overall, while the game offers a fun experience in short bursts, it struggles with repetitiveness and technical flaws that detract from its potential.
- “The gameplay loop is enjoyable; killing zombies, finding scrap and ammo, finding and changing to the other characters, and strengthening your team and base.”
- “The gameplay is great and I would say this game is well worth the time and the money that it would cost you.”
- “The gameplay is quite fluid and very addictive, designed to be a pick-up-and-go game, something I feel would best suit a mobile device.”
- “A combination of severe (and I mean severe) performance issues, a gameplay loop that overstays its welcome halfway through, bad RNG, and some frustrating checkpoint mechanics are not a winning combination.”
- “The core gameplay is flawed, very repetitive, and boring.”
- “It's horrifically repetitive; all the weapons feel the same, all the fences seem the same, there is just nothing that dynamically changes the gameplay at all.”
graphics
164 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
57%
11%
The graphics of the game are characterized by a distinctive art style created by gonzossm, which many players find charming and reminiscent of classic flash games. While the visuals are generally appreciated for their creativity and character design, some users report performance issues, such as lag and repetitive scenery, which detract from the overall experience. Overall, the graphics are seen as a mixed bag, with a strong artistic flair but technical shortcomings that can hinder gameplay.
- “The graphics are great, the small little cinematics they have are really funny.”
- “I love everything about this game, from the art style to the pure action of killing zombies.”
- “Personally, I absolutely love his art style, and I think it really suits the game, and greatly improves it from what it could be otherwise.”
- “With limited graphics settings that kept reverting to default every time I played the game and no resolution that fit my monitor.”
- “The graphics are bad no matter what setting you have them on, but I feel like it adds to the game somewhat.”
- “The graphics were never an issue until there were massive dips in the frame rate, causing the mouse to sporadically move around the screen with a huge amount of lag.”
humor
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
97%
3%
The humor in the game is a mix of lowbrow and absurdity, featuring repetitive yet occasionally funny dialogue and unique, stereotypical characters that elicit laughter. While some jokes may rely on toilet humor and stereotypes, many players find the overall comedic tone enjoyable, especially during cutscenes and character interactions. However, the humor can become stale over time, particularly with the AI's repetitive lines, but it still contributes to a fun and entertaining experience.
- “In the beginning, it is fantastic zombie slaughtering action with a comedic lowbrow humor to accompany your journey.”
- “The voice acting is hilariously bad (the first time I heard the voice for the Russian guy, which was an obviously English-speaking person trying their hardest to be as stereotypical as possible, I burst out laughing), and lines are repeated often, though it never interrupts the game or gets annoying.”
- “Murder millions of zombies with funny characters and hilarious zombie types, and survive 30 nights of pure horror?”
- “The teammates you are forced to work with are stupid, unfunny gits who repeat the same stupid, unfunny lines over and over for nearly 30 days and nights.”
optimization
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
55%
36%
The game's optimization is severely lacking, with users reporting constant lag and performance degradation, even on high-end hardware. Many players express frustration over memory leaks and unresponsive gameplay, which detracts from the overall experience. Despite some enjoyable gameplay elements, the poor optimization significantly hampers the game's potential and leaves players hoping for future patches.
- “Had it been made in almost any other engine, the game could – would – have been optimized a lot better than what it is.”
- “If this game had better performance, I would definitely recommend it!”
- “I will replay the game to improve my performance and the achievements I didn't get the first time around.”
- “The game does have a huge performance issue where it basically lags for you, but everything else functions normally.”
- “A combination of severe (and I mean severe) performance issues, a gameplay loop that overstays its welcome halfway through, bad RNG, and some frustrating checkpoint mechanics are not a winning combination.”
- “Poorly optimized to the point of being ridiculous.”
story
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
70%
7%
The story of the game is set during World War II, focusing on a trio of stereotyped characters surviving a zombie apocalypse over 30 day/night cycles. While the narrative is simple and often seen as an afterthought, it provides a sense of progression and includes charming animations that add humor and depth to the survival experience. Overall, the story is enjoyable but lacks depth, serving primarily as a backdrop to the gameplay.
- “The story takes place during World War II and has you surviving 30 day and night cycles against increasingly difficult waves of zombies.”
- “Every five days you are rewarded with an animation about life as a survivor, from bowel issues to romance to deep thought; this story goes all over the place!”
- “Deadly 30's storyline is essentially three very different people trying to survive in a WWII zombie apocalypse.”
- “The lack of real story makes the game less compelling.”
- “The story is generic zombie fare and there are enjoyable cutscenes throughout; however, it is more of an afterthought with the game's focus on gameplay/survival.”
- “This is a condensed version of the latter game with the story consisting of the bare minimum.”
stability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
92%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting frequent crashes, significant performance issues, and a host of bugs that make it nearly unplayable on modern systems. Many players experience severe frame rate drops, glitches, and problems with mouse control, leading to a frustrating gaming experience. Overall, while some find it enjoyable in short bursts, the pervasive instability detracts significantly from its potential.
- “Great buy for $5 (or less if you catch it on sale), runs great even on my old 13" Core 2 Duo aluminum MacBook that I use for a netbook.”
- “Somehow, this game runs worse on modern systems than it originally did. The resolution is beyond broken, it constantly freezes and speeds up, and it crashes sometimes (taking your save alongside it), all coming together to make a game that is impossible to play.”
- “Tl;dr - the game is buggy on both Mac and Windows OS, so don't buy it.”
- “But even on 'bad' settings, fullscreen on low resolution and a really good PC, it freezes down to 20 fps per night, while you are unable to control your character because it delays heavily.”
grinding
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is described as both tedious and frustrating, with players often feeling compelled to scavenge for resources to progress, only to face punishing mechanics that can lead to significant setbacks. While some players find enjoyment in the grind reminiscent of classic flash games, others criticize the gameplay for being overly linear and repetitive, resulting in a lack of engagement. Overall, the grinding experience is a mixed bag, appealing to fans of resource management but potentially alienating those seeking more dynamic gameplay.
- “Seems like a very frustrating grinding mechanism.”
- “There are some decent elements to the game, but the tedious grinding and gameplay kills the fun.”
- “Gameplay couldn't possibly be more tedious and linear.”
replayability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
54%
33%
Overall, the game exhibits little to no replayability after the initial playthrough, with many players finding the gameplay easy and repetitive. While some elements, like achievements, offer mild replay value, the lack of a compelling storyline or multiplayer options limits the incentive to revisit the game. Players generally agree that once completed, the game does not encourage further engagement.
- “You can complete the game in about three hours, but the game is made with replayability in mind.”
- “The replay value is also great, since it is almost a sandbox game.”
- “Replayability: I got all the achievements and beat the game, so I probably won't play it again; however, I may actually pick it up again to see if I can do it better and faster.”
- “The gameplay is fun, but fairly easy and repetitive once you understand what you're supposed to do; no replayability.”
- “The game is overall good, I haven't experienced any bugs, but I have seen some people complain that the game is cheap and fun. However, there is no replay value; you finish the game and that's it. If you really want this game, go for it, but personally, I would recommend you buy it now (summer sale) because it's cheaper or just wait for the winter sale.”
- “The difficulty is supposed to give a lot of replayability, but the upgrade path is a slow one-way track that caps at level 13 and has pathetically little base strategy.”
music
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
The music in the game is noted for creating a strong atmosphere and evoking feelings of isolation, with some reviewers highlighting its quality and ability to relax players. However, others find it to be forgettable and not particularly special, drawing comparisons to classic titles like the original Resident Evil. Overall, while the soundtrack has its merits, opinions on its impact vary among players.
- “The music and the fine artwork set a great atmosphere.”
- “Also, the soundtrack is really well done, so that's a plus.”
- “Well, the music/sound is fine, if forgettable and nothing special.”
- “Blind spots are: storyline, sound/music, replayability, game progression.”
- “If you ever played the original Resident Evil for the PlayStation back in 1996, you will definitely feel the similarities in terms of its game scenario and music score.”
atmosphere
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
80%
10%
10%
The game's atmosphere is consistently described as dark and atmospheric, enhanced by its music and artwork. While the graphical style may not stand out, its colorful elements contribute humor to the otherwise tense and spooky environment. Overall, the atmosphere is a key strength, elevating the gameplay experience despite the game's potential abandonment.
- “While the graphical style isn't anything noteworthy, its colorful nature adds to the already tense and spooky atmosphere, providing some humor as a sort of light in the dark.”
- “The music and the fine artwork set a great atmosphere.”
- “I think this is a very well-made game; a simple gameplay concept, but it excelled above that because of the atmosphere, the great artwork, characters, and the twisted minds that built this game. Well done!”
- “While the graphical style isn't anything noteworthy, its colorful nature adds some humor to the already tense and spooky atmosphere, serving as a sort of light in the dark.”
character development
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
Reviewers appreciate the character designs, noting their cartoonish style enhances the game's lighthearted tone. However, while the visual upgrades to the base are engaging, the repetitive scavenging environments detract from the overall character development experience.
- “The character design itself, which is cartoonish, makes the light color and humor fit with each other perfectly.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game to be a powerful emotional experience, highlighting its ability to deeply engage with themes of struggle and resilience. Despite its surface appearance, it effectively draws players into an emotional journey.
- “Don't let the game fool you; this is an emotional gripper that delves into the struggles.”