Data Center

About

Data Center is a single player economy management game with a economy theme. It was developed by Waseku and was released on March 31, 2026. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Build, cable, and grow a living data center from the ground up. Start with bare floors, buy racks, servers, and switches, then physically place and stack your hardware the way you want. Run Ethernet between ports to shape your network by hand and watch data spring to life: every customer’s traffic appears as colored packet-balls rolling along your cables, revealing bottlenecks, idle links, and bea…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 223 reviews

gameplay9 positive mentions

grinding9 negative mentions

Unique and satisfying cable management and networking simulation that appeals to tech enthusiasts and those interested in data centers.
Visual packet flow and real-time data visualization add an engaging and intuitive layer to the gameplay.
Developer is active and responsive with ongoing patches and has potential plans for future expansion, including mods and co-op.

Lacks depth and content, with simplistic networking features and very limited hardware options leading to repetitive gameplay after a few hours.
User interface and quality of life features need improvements, including tedious manual IP configuration, clunky trolley mechanics, and inefficient staff management.
Performance issues, bugs, and an unrealistic short end-of-life system for hardware diminish the experience and contribute to frustration.

gameplay
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
65%
9%
The gameplay is praised for its solid core loop and unique, addictive cable and device management mechanics but is widely considered shallow, repetitive, and lacking depth or content. Many reviewers note the absence of promised features, unbalanced mechanics, and poor tutorials, resulting in limited long-term engagement. While enjoyable initially, the gameplay would benefit greatly from additional complexity, polish, and expanded mechanics.
- “The core gameplay is already addictive and unique—it just needs more depth, content, and polish.”
- “Super satisfying cable management gameplay.”
- “Overall, it's a solid gameplay of cable and device management.”
- “Janky controls and movement, unintelligible tutorials, boring gameplay loop after you've built the first rack, and the core skill seems to be remembering an IP address for the 10 seconds it takes to walk from point A to B.”
- “Great concept but even an hour in I can unlock and pay for every technician in the game, have seen every mechanic except for end-of-life (EOL) which the technicians could take care of anyway, and the game is just far too shallow.”
- “There simply isn't enough to do and it is clearly not finished as several technologies, mechanics and items are referenced in the tutorial but don't exist in the game.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
58%
21%
The graphics are generally underwhelming and suffer from performance issues, including lag and occasional glitches, even on low settings. Users note motion sickness caused by camera movement, use of AI artwork, and a perceived lack of polish, suggesting the visuals could benefit from a significant overhaul. Despite stability in crashes, the overall graphical experience leaves much to be desired.
- “Mostly good graphics and stable performance with no major crashes.”
- “There's almost no difference between the demo and the full release in terms of visuals, aside from a few extra items and customers.”
- “The game definitely needs more content and mechanics, and a coat of fresh paint on the graphics.”
- “My computer shouldn't have to turn the fans to full blast mode for a game this graphically underwhelming.”
- “Lots of performance issues even on very low graphics settings and after 3.5 hours of gameplay, the save file corrupted and I lost all my progress.”
- “Right now, the camera movement and overall visuals are causing serious motion sickness.”
optimization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
Optimization in the game is inconsistent, with some users experiencing smooth performance above 144 fps and good Linux support, while others face significant slowdowns, especially in the late game with complex setups, as well as crashes and save file corruption. Performance issues such as heat management and general lag are noted, indicating the game is not fully optimized yet.
- “The game runs smoothly for me at over 144 fps.”
- “Very well optimized, works great on Linux which is what I am running it on.”
- “Performance was much better in the full game than the demo, which is also nice to see.”
- “Lots of performance issues even on very low graphics settings and after 3.5 hours of gameplay the save file corrupted and I lost all my progress.”
- “Once I got into the late game and started building bigger data center setups—servers pushing around 500k IOPS per GPU/mainframe and handling about 10 customers—the performance really started to tank.”
- “It honestly feels like the game just isn’t optimized for late-game yet, especially when your infrastructure gets more complex.”
grinding
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect starts with a fun concept but quickly becomes tedious and repetitive, especially in the late game. Tasks like hauling large quantities, managing multiple machines, and addressing server errors are highlighted as monotonous and lacking challenge. The absence of quality-of-life features, such as a templating system, exacerbates the mindless grinding experience.
- “It’s not fun, it’s not challenging; it’s just mindless grinding for the sake of a trophy.”
- “The manual addressing of every machine is a very tedious task to do.”
- “The fact that the game also lacks any templating system makes this repetition genuinely tedious.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The game experiences occasional glitches, such as the trolley getting stuck and cable placement issues, requiring players to reload from autosaves or manually fix problems. While generally stable, these bugs can interrupt the experience, especially for newcomers unfamiliar with deeper technical troubleshooting.
- “There are a few glitches, like the trolley randomly getting stuck in the floor and you have to either nudge it back or reload from an autosave.”
- “Some bugs and glitches, such as cable placement problems and trolley issues.”
- “Five minutes later you’re troubleshooting things you don’t fully understand.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the replayability solid, appreciating the game's ability to be played repeatedly, though some suggest adding features like hardware repair or upgrades to enhance realism and further increase replay value.
- “At least give us the option to repair or upgrade hardware like in PC Simulator — that would add realism and replayability.”
- “And the replayability — you can play it again and again.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is subtle and niche, often revolving around mundane or technical details like routing cables and server racks. Some players appreciate the lighthearted focus on seemingly trivial elements, such as a DLC centered entirely around a cart, finding it amusing.
- “Honestly, if you dislike the idea of just routing cables, a hum of fans, and server racks filled with the exact same thing, then it's not a thing for you sadly :(”
- “I love how much time and attention has gone into the cart, and I think it's hilarious that the cart is the entirety of the DLC!!!!”