Command & Conquer: Rivals™ PVP

About

"Command & Conquer: Rivals" is a fast-paced, action-packed real-time strategy game where you build and customize your army to outsmart opponents in PvP battles. Choose a Commander with unique abilities, evolve your army to align with their strengths, and utilize infantry, tanks, aircraft, and more in strategic tactics to claim victory in The War for Tiberium. Team up with friends in alliances, share resources, and revel in the thrill of rivalry as you test your strategy against others. Victory is yours for the taking!

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Command & Conquer: Rivals™ PVP screenshot

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews

gameplay300 positive mentions

monetization161 negative mentions

The game captures the essence of the original Command & Conquer series, providing a nostalgic experience.
Gameplay is fast-paced and strategic, allowing for various tactics and unit combinations.
The graphics and sound design are well-executed, enhancing the overall experience.

The game heavily relies on a pay-to-win model, making it difficult for free-to-play players to progress.
Matchmaking is often unbalanced, frequently pairing players with significantly higher-level opponents.
The game lacks a single-player campaign or skirmish mode, limiting gameplay variety.

gameplay
715 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
46%
12%
The gameplay of the new Command & Conquer mobile game has received mixed reviews, with many players enjoying its fast-paced, strategic mechanics reminiscent of the original series. However, a significant number of users criticize the game for its pay-to-win model, unbalanced matchmaking, and repetitive gameplay, which detracts from the overall experience. While some appreciate the nostalgic elements and smooth controls, others express disappointment over the lack of depth and variety, leading to a frustrating experience for casual players.
- “Gameplay is fun, the only problem is lower level players always meet with higher player level and no chance to level up to higher ranking unless you spend money on the diamonds, ea should improves the algorithm between low level and high level player, and makes 90% fun games and 10% money profits.”
- “The gameplay is smooth and the graphics are crisp and high quality.”
- “The gameplay is fantastic, there are compelling strategies and unit combinations to experiment with and try out.”
- “Gameplay fast becomes repetitive as it's the same objective every time and if your opponent has an epic unit and you don't - prepare for unwinnable matches.”
- “The gameplay is boring and terrible.”
- “This game is a prime example of the combat triangle and strategic gameplay.”
graphics
561 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
45%
40%
14%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals as "fantastic" and "amazing," particularly on high-end devices, while others criticize them for being low-resolution, pixelated, or poorly optimized for various phones. Many users express a desire for customizable graphics settings to enhance their experience, especially on devices that struggle with the game's default settings. Overall, while some appreciate the art style and smooth performance, a significant number find the graphics disappointing compared to expectations for a modern mobile game.
- “The graphics are amazing and the gameplay is the best.”
- “Great graphics and sound effects.”
- “The graphics are fantastic, the sound is good.”
- “Graphics are really poor and have very jagged edges, not the quality we are now used to.”
- “The graphics are very underwhelming, even for a mobile game.”
- “The graphics are simple but well polished.”
monetization
353 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
38%
46%
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to its reliance on microtransactions and loot boxes that create a pay-to-win environment. While some users report being able to enjoy the game without spending money, the general consensus is that progression is heavily skewed towards those willing to invest real money, leading to frustration and a sense of imbalance in competitive play. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, detracting from the game's potential and legacy.
- “The monetization doesn't seem to be too strict; I haven't spent a single dime on this game, and I'm already in the gold league.”
- “The in-app purchases are not necessary to be a successful player.”
- “Progression is relatively quick, and microtransactions are optional and not at all necessary to win.”
- “I wanted to love this game, but the fact is that it's just a cash grab pay-to-win system.”
- “The monetization heavily influenced my negative opinion.”
- “This game is nothing but a cheap and quick cash grab.”
story
197 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
70%
11%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its absence, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of a single-player campaign or engaging narrative. Reviews highlight that the gameplay is primarily focused on PvP battles, leading to repetitive missions that lack the depth and variety of traditional Command & Conquer titles. Players long for a return to the franchise's roots, featuring a compelling storyline and diverse missions that enhance the overall experience.
- “I think to make it Command & Conquer, a single player story would have taken this from a good game to a great one. Imagine being the first must-have single player RTS experience on mobile.”
- “It's a great game, wish it had more missions like the original Command & Conquer.”
- “Would love to see a small campaign with unit limitations based on story and development to really test strategy.”
- “No story mode, no different missions, nothing else to do.”
- “Boring, no storyline that Command and Conquer was known for.”
- “If this game had a storyline or campaign it would be 5 stars, but it's all PvP and gets too boring too quickly.”
stability
109 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
3%
94%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent glitches, crashes, and unresponsive controls that significantly hinder gameplay. Many users describe the experience as frustrating and unplayable due to these issues, particularly during battles, where freezes and bugs can lead to automatic losses. While some players find the game enjoyable, the overwhelming consensus is that it requires urgent fixes to address its numerous stability problems.
- “No glitches, no bugs so far.”
- “Runs great on my Moto X4.”
- “No glitches on Samsung 9.”
- “Good game but glitches make it unplayable.”
- “Beyond addictive but too many bugs: - glitches mid-battle so controls don't work properly (loses touches) - crashes mid-battle once every 3-4 battles - hangs if you surrender as the final missile is launching - sometimes can't get rid of the Android status bar that overlays the game annoyingly.”
- “Game freezes and crashes frequently.”
grinding
75 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
1%
97%
The reviews highlight a pervasive issue with grinding in the game, where players often feel forced into excessive repetition to progress, especially if they opt not to spend money. Many users express frustration over the slow pace of advancement and the imbalance created by pay-to-win mechanics, leading to a tedious experience that detracts from overall enjoyment. While some acknowledge that free-to-play progression is possible, it typically requires an overwhelming amount of time and effort, making the game feel more like a grind than a rewarding challenge.
- “With a progression system that seems pretty easy to understand and not too grindy.”
- “However, you will get to a point where you simply can't progress without excessively grinding or paying, despite their claim of 'fair play'.”
- “No matter how much grinding you do, or how good you are, you won't beat the wallet warriors who can quickly churn out massive elite units.”
- “This 'game' (I use that term loosely) is nothing more than a skinner box efficiency trap which is designed to be so annoying that you end up paying to make the game more bearable.”
optimization
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
47%
27%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many players experiencing frequent performance warnings, connection issues, and stuttering gameplay, even on high-end devices. Users report that the game often fails to recognize compatible phones, leading to poor graphics and unresponsive controls. While some players find the game runs smoothly, the overall sentiment indicates a pressing need for optimization improvements to enhance the gaming experience.
- “This game has the best performance and it really feels good when you play and win.”
- “It's well made and runs smoothly.”
- “Lots of fun, fast, good performance, easy to understand and control but seems like plenty of depth waiting to be uncovered.”
- “The connection issues are so bad that you will get no less than 10 'poor connection' messages during each match (regardless of being on WiFi or cellular), which results in characters stuttering across the map and likely causing your characters to be killed because they were being attacked while your display was frozen and because you couldn't move them out of harm's way.”
- “Upgraded to my Note 10 at the phone's launch and the game flags it as an incompatible phone and plays with severely reduced graphics and performance.”
- “Not to mention awful optimization that makes decent devices stutter.”
music
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
55%
14%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its quality while others criticize it as generic and lacking the iconic soundtracks from previous titles in the series. Many fans express a desire for the return of classic tracks, such as those by Frank Klepacki, to enhance the game's atmosphere. Overall, while the music is noted as enjoyable by some, it fails to capture the essence of the original games for many players.
- “The artwork is great and the music, if I'm not mistaken, is taken from some of the original games, at least in inspiration.”
- “It's a pity because the graphics, sound effects, and music are all stunning.”
- “Good graphics and love the music.”
- “The art is cartoony, the music is generic, the atmosphere is nonexistent.”
- “A game that requires shedloads of real money to make progress like the soundtrack with snippets of previous versions PvP is irritating and doesn't allow for base build up; thought it would have campaign mode like older games, disappointing.”
- “Only black screen and background music.”
humor
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
92%
25%
The humor in the game is a mixed bag; while some players find it amusing with funny glitches and nostalgic elements reminiscent of the classic C&C series, others criticize it for lacking depth and interaction, leading to a perception of it being "not funny" or broken. Overall, the humor is appreciated by some but overshadowed by gameplay issues and a desire for more engaging content.
- “This is not the true C&C that we all loved, but it is still a very funny game.”
- “Would be so great to see another full C&C story mode someday with all the funny voices and acting.”
- “Very funny, but the game needs more interaction with other users, for example, a better chat system.”
- “It is not funny at all.”
- “The humor falls flat and feels forced.”
- “I expected more laughs, but it just didn't deliver.”
emotional
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a mix of nostalgia and disappointment regarding the emotional impact of the game. While some appreciate the modernized controls and challenge reminiscent of the original Command and Conquer, others feel heartbroken by the perceived decline of the series, citing issues like pay-to-win mechanics and repetitive gameplay that detract from the overall experience.
- “I would like to congratulate those who contributed to the emotional and psychological elements of the game.”
- “This is exactly what every player of Command and Conquer ever wanted, a brilliant mobile customized control with the same concepts of the original game, a nostalgic yet modernized experience that made me feel challenged in a way no game except Command and Conquer can do.”
- “This is so heartbreaking to see another beloved game series shat all over like this.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The atmosphere of the game is polarizing; while some players appreciate its fun and nostalgic ties to classic Command and Conquer, others criticize it for lacking depth, featuring generic music, and fostering a pay-to-win environment that detracts from the overall experience.
- “Very fun and true to the classic Command and Conquer atmosphere.”
- “The art is cartoony, the music is generic, the atmosphere is nonexistent.”
- “Gone is the RTS platform; now it's joined the arena platform of card collection, poor incomes, chest timers, and an overall pay-to-play atmosphere.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
Overall, users express mixed feelings about replayability; while some find the game highly addictive with great replay value, others point out issues with the donation system that could detract from the overall experience.
- “Replayability is good.”
- “Most addictive game with a high replay value!”
- “Worth the time as it offers great replay value.”
- “The donation system is unpolished and feels unbalanced. Donating a common rarity card only gives you 10 gold, while you can buy 5 for 150 gold in the shop, making it a net loss. This raises concerns about the overall replayability of the game.”
- “I haven't played much yet, but I can already tell that there are many aspects that need fixing. The lack of meaningful rewards makes me question whether I'll want to replay the game.”
- “It's frustrating to see a game that could be enjoyable but is marred by systems that don't incentivize replayability. If the mechanics are flawed, it makes it hard to stay engaged.”