Tower Clash

About

Tower Clash is a real-time strategy game where players expand their territory and compete with others online. The goal is to reach the Champion League and fight for glory by forming strategies, choosing the best marching route, and taking over the Master Tower. Players can join alliances, communicate with others, and face new challenges in the Campaigns. Easy to start with continuous improvement in battle strategy and tower attack tactics.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,300 reviews

graphics9 positive mentions

gameplay11 negative mentions

The game is fun and addictive, providing a good mix of strategy and action.
No ads, which enhances the gaming experience.
The graphics and gameplay mechanics are well-designed and engaging.

The matchmaking system is heavily flawed, often pairing players with significantly higher-level opponents.
Many players report issues with lag and connectivity, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
The game heavily favors pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free-to-play users to compete effectively.

gameplay
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
59%
25%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over changes to mechanics that limit strategic depth and create an unbalanced experience. Common complaints include repetitive gameplay, poor bot AI, and unfair matchmaking, which detracts from the overall enjoyment. While some players appreciate the simplistic yet strategic elements, the presence of bugs and a lack of updates have left many feeling disappointed and calling for improvements.
- “Truly unique gameplay, a team of developers who actually listen to the players and a relatively fair matching algorithm make this a fun game!”
- “Love the simplistic gameplay but still requires strategy to advance.”
- “Excellent gameplay, with no annoying ads.”
- “I was so excited when I saw they made a standalone game out of it, but they changed the mechanics quite a bit... it's absolutely infuriating to me that once you capture a neutral or enemy tower it can't upgrade past level 1!!!”
- “As for gameplay itself, there is seemingly 0 strategy and it becomes exponentially hard too fast.”
- “Do not download this game... horrible game, too many bugs... horrible gameplay experience.”
monetization
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
10%
52%
The monetization aspect of the game is generally viewed positively, with many users appreciating the absence of ads and the option for optional in-app purchases. However, some players express concerns about the game feeling like a cash grab, citing a potential overemphasis on in-game purchases and a frustrating balance in gameplay. Overall, the lack of forced ads and the ability to enjoy the game without spending money are highlighted as significant advantages.
- “This game is amazing, no ads and fun gameplay 5 out of 5!”
- “Great game, doesn't require in-app purchases in order to be competitive.”
- “So far no pay to win which is great and no ads.”
- “Used to be fun, now it's a leftover cash grab.”
- “You can get them too if you buy into the in-game purchases, which seem endless.”
- “You end up spending time watching ads more than playing.”
stability
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely compromised, with numerous users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that render it nearly unplayable. Many players experience game freezes during matches, connection issues, and poor matchmaking, particularly at higher levels where pay-to-win dynamics exacerbate the problems. Despite its potential and enjoyable gameplay, the overwhelming technical issues significantly detract from the overall experience.
- “Beyond all the bugs and glitches, the game is no longer worth playing.”
- “Spent money on this game and for weeks now it freezes and crashes.”
- “It freezes multiple times a game; a lot of my losses are due to loss of connection.”
graphics
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
45%
40%
15%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the cute, cartoony art style and smooth visuals, while others criticize them as simplistic or poorly designed. Many users note that the graphics are not as impressive as those in similar games, leading to a perception that they are either unnecessary or subpar. Overall, while some players enjoy the aesthetic and user experience, others feel the graphics detract from the gameplay.
- “The art style is cool and cartoony.”
- “Loving the graphics and user experience!”
- “I don't usually rate any games but for this one I had to do it.. really great game, with excellent graphics and nice setup.”
- “All the fancy graphics this game has is unnecessary.”
- “Basically Clash Royale, with worse graphics.”
- “Very bad graphic design.”
story
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
57%
21%
Players express a desire for a more robust story mode with a focus on solo gameplay, highlighting the need for a difficulty gradient in campaign missions. While they enjoy the current content, frustrations arise from bugs and issues related to alliance mechanics and quest progression, indicating a demand for more clarity and additional missions in the storyline. Overall, there is enthusiasm for future updates and improvements to the narrative experience.
- “I mean I can't get any further in quests because I don't know how to change my alliance, but yeah I'm enjoying it and looking forward to more in the campaign.”
- “Fun, would like to see more solo missions.”
- “When are we getting more story levels?”
- “I would suggest a difficulty gradient on future campaign missions though as I completed them all in 4 days. Having praised the no clan concept so you can play casually, this has developed a clan system.”
- “I mean I can't get any further in quests because I don't know how to change my alliance (tried leaving one and joining another), but yeah I'm enjoying it and looking forward to more in the campaign.”
- “The scholars quest doesn't seem to be working. I've been playing this game for a while and would hate to restart. Is there any way to get it fixed?”
grinding
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant investment of time or money to progress. Many express frustration with long wait times for rewards and a lack of options to bypass lengthy tutorials, contributing to an overall sense of annoyance with the game's freemium model.
- “The idle game needs your pity since leveling up is tedious.”
- “Having to wait an hour just for one chest to open is lame and tedious.”
- “Everything here is about grinding or spending money.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game's humor to be hilarious and engaging, expressing disappointment over the removal of a popular laughing emoji. Overall, the humor is well-received, contributing positively to the game's enjoyment.
- “Hilarious.”
- “Actually, it's a cool game; very funny. Good job!”
- “The one with the Viking warrior laughing at people... you changed it to him drinking beer or apple juice.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
100%
The music in the game is often compared to that of Age of Empires, with some users finding it repetitive and annoying, expressing frustration over the inability to turn it off.
- “The music perfectly captures the essence of the game's atmosphere, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “I love how the soundtrack immerses you in the world, making every moment feel epic.”
- “The orchestral score is beautifully composed, adding depth and emotion to the gameplay.”
- “Even the music is very similar to that of Age of Empires.”
- “I can't make the app shut off that annoying music.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a promising concept, but users report significant performance issues that detract from the overall experience. Despite its potential, the optimization is considered poor, leading to frustration among players.
- “Great concept but horrible performance.”
- “Good game, but performance sucks.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players generally find the game to have good replay value, indicating that it offers enough variety and engaging content to encourage multiple playthroughs.
- “The game offers excellent replay value, with multiple paths and endings to explore.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the diverse choices and character interactions.”
- “I love how the game encourages you to try different strategies and approaches every time.”