Rush Royale: Tower Defense TD

About

Rush Royale: Tower Defense TD is a strategy game with sensational gameplay, wonderful graphics, and hilarious moments. However, it features heavy grinding and frequent ads, and can be quite buggy. In this game, protect your castle, level up your heroes, and clash in PvP battles to become the ultimate champion.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Rush Royale: Tower Defense TD screenshot

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 3,780 reviews

gameplay112 positive mentions

monetization647 negative mentions

The game has fantastic gameplay and unique mechanics that keep it engaging.
It offers a variety of characters and strategies, making it enjoyable for different play styles.
The game is addictive and can be played without mandatory ads, allowing players to choose when to watch them for rewards.

The game has become heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to progress.
There are frequent connection issues that lead to disconnections and losses, frustrating the gameplay experience.
The matchmaking system is unbalanced, often pairing players with significantly stronger opponents, which diminishes the enjoyment.

monetization
744 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
8%
87%
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a "cash grab" due to the overwhelming presence of ads and high in-game purchase prices. While some users appreciate the option to watch ads for rewards, they often report technical issues where ads fail to provide promised bonuses, leading to frustration. Overall, the game is perceived as heavily leaning towards pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free-to-play users to progress without watching numerous ads or spending money.
- “The gameplay is pretty simple and there's quite a few different metas, but the best part about it is there are literally no ads invading gameplay or anything like that... they'll pop up when you level up and there's options to watch ads for rewards, but they aren't forced upon you.”
- “I would gladly pay money to get the rewards with no ads permanently.”
- “Decent game, no ads unless it's for a micro-transaction or you watch one to get a reward which is amazing.”
- “The game is a cash grab.”
- “It's impossible to achieve anything in this game without watching ads or buying with real money.”
- “The ads are absolutely absurd and often don't give you the rewards they promise.”
gameplay
270 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
53%
6%
The gameplay of this tower defense game is described as fun and addictive, featuring unique mechanics and a blend of strategy and luck. However, many players express frustration over frequent changes to game mechanics, a heavy reliance on pay-to-win elements, and issues with balance and matchmaking, which detract from the overall experience. While the graphics and core gameplay are praised, the constant updates and monetization strategies have led to a perception of the game as increasingly unfair and repetitive.
- “This is one of the best tower defense games with fantastic gameplay and optional ads.”
- “Awesome creative gameplay, cool colors, and addictive.”
- “The gameplay is smooth, and I find it fairly easy to understand, although there are many different settings to understand.”
- “The paid items I was buying have been cut in half since the last update; you cannot strategically plan a deck you want to upgrade because they change the mechanics and values of upgrades every month. My long-term clan has all quit!”
- “Gameplay is decent, but with all ads and pay-to-win, where the main game is PvP with random opponents, it just isn't very fun.”
- “The gameplay is totally bizarre.”
stability
93 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely criticized, with users reporting frequent crashes, freezes, and connection issues that disrupt gameplay. Many players experience consistent bugs that lead to lost matches and frustration, particularly during critical moments like watching ads or in competitive modes. Overall, the game's technical problems significantly detract from the enjoyment and functionality, prompting some users to consider uninstalling it.
- “The game just logs out randomly, stops, and freezes.”
- “Game constantly freezes and crashes.”
- “I have been trying to play this game for the last several hours but I can't even make it through the intro because it freezes after a few seconds.”
graphics
84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
65%
31%
4%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive a mixed but generally positive reception, with many players praising the beautiful art style and engaging visuals. However, some users report performance issues, such as lag and incomplete loading of graphics, which detracts from the experience. While the graphics are often described as appealing and cartoonish, there are calls for improvements in performance and options for lower graphic settings to enhance gameplay stability.
- “The graphics are nice, the gameplay is addictive, and the constant addition of new content is honestly amazing.”
- “The graphics are great, mechanics are simple, and they give fair amounts of work to do.”
- “I love the aesthetics and the game has a decent amount of content and variant game modes.”
- “Game could do with a graphics upgrade; when you've got a lot of animations going on, like from the witch, dryad, curse squares, pudding blots, etc., it's really difficult to see what merge rank things are.”
- “Game does not load properly and the graphics are not visible, which makes it a little difficult to play.”
- “Wether it's the opponent who has lag or the game servers, the graphics don't display, or the spinning of a unit that should be merged but then it's not... mechanics are broken.”
grinding
79 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
99%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring months of effort to achieve meaningful progress without spending money. Many players feel that the game leans heavily towards a pay-to-win model, where significant investment is needed to keep up with competitive players, making the grind feel futile. While some players find enjoyment in the grinding process, the overall sentiment suggests that it can quickly become frustrating and demotivating, especially as updates can reset progress or introduce new challenges that require even more grinding.
- “It's possible to progress without spending money; obviously, your progress is sped up by spending, but the grind isn't too overwhelming.”
- “The grind feels rewarding and balanced, allowing players to enjoy the journey without feeling forced to pay.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers a fair grind, where dedication and effort lead to meaningful rewards.”
- “It takes forever to upgrade without using your whole paycheck, and after grinding for months, they introduce an update which sets you back again.”
- “To play this game 'free' would require literal years of grinding.”
- “It's fun at first, then it becomes intensely grindy with no real payoff.”
story
62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
90%
5%
The game's story and lore are criticized for being underdeveloped, leading to a lack of immersion and engagement. Players express frustration over the heavy reliance on grinding and paywalls, which detracts from the enjoyment of the game and makes progression feel tedious and unbalanced. Many users desire a more structured story mode with meaningful quests, rather than the repetitive and monetized quest system currently in place.
- “Lots of fun, playful storyline & good graphics.”
- “I wish they would make a story mode and add 50 levels to it every season or something where you do the traditional wave fighting for custom rewards or something but this game is actually so fun.”
- “Only suggestion would be to maybe put in a story mode?”
- “Lots of opportunities missed with building a story and lore to improve immersion.”
- “The game is pretty much a reskin of another game and they offer pay plans that go so far that even daily quests are hidden behind a money unlock.”
- “Basically this game has nice ideas, but everything is locked behind such a thick paywall it's ridiculous once you reach a certain point, even the story can't be progressed without upgraded units (around floor 8 or so).”
optimization
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
56%
28%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including lag, disconnections, and high resource consumption, particularly on older devices. Users express frustration over the lack of attention to optimization, suggesting that the game feels clunky and unresponsive, which detracts from the overall experience. While some players note that the game can run smoothly at times, the frequent performance problems and server issues overshadow its potential, leading to calls for urgent improvements from the developers.
- “The reason I'm giving it 4 stars is the optimization of this game.”
- “A lot of strategy and optimization as you unlock new cards.”
- “Will be happy to rate it 5 once optimization is improved; I know it can run better than this for a 2D game...”
- “I played a lot of matches and collected many characters, but honestly, I had one tantrum too many because of the ridiculous performance issues with this game, so I will delete it.”
- “It is like they do not care about optimization and focus more on where to hide ads to play continuously in the background, using up far more resources on devices.”
- “The game performance is noticeably slow, with long loading times and delayed responses during gameplay.”
music
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many users expressing frustration over its inability to be muted despite settings indicating otherwise. While some appreciate the quality of the music, others find it repetitive and intrusive, especially when trying to enjoy their own playlists. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a significant drawback, detracting from the gaming experience due to its persistent presence and similarity to other games like "Clash Royale."
- “The graphics and music; great.”
- “The ad implies the towers attack on beat to the music and make the song.”
- “Love the game, great job! I cut the sound off because I tend to listen to music in the background, and it keeps saying it's off but keeps playing it.”
- “Hate that the only way to listen to music while playing is having a secondary device and just turn down the volume on the device you're playing the app on.”
- “I uninstalled when I couldn't find an option to turn the music off.”
- “Addictive and time-consuming game, needs a lot of funds to advance, but the most annoying part is the music that starts suddenly out of nowhere even with the sound options off.”
humor
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
82%
18%
The humor in the reviews primarily stems from users' frustrations with the game's connection issues and monetization strategies, often highlighting the irony of spending money without receiving adequate rewards. Many find the mechanics and pricing absurdly funny, with comments on the high costs of in-app purchases and the developers seemingly profiting from players' struggles. Overall, while some aspects are intended to be humorous, the prevailing sentiment is that the game's issues have overshadowed any genuine enjoyment.
- “The funny thing is that this skill protects for quite a long time and has a short cooldown, especially if he has a royal duck.”
- “The new double boss is so bad it's hilarious.”
- “Ads aren't bad on this one but the cost of in-app purchases is hilariously high.”
- “There are many unfunny mechanics when it comes to combat.”
- “A boring, limited boss rush substituted it... okay, this game is not funny anymore.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The game's replayability is mixed; some players find it lacking due to minimal rewards and frustrating experiences, while others appreciate the variety offered by random merging and different unit combinations, which keeps the gameplay engaging. Overall, the experience can vary significantly based on player skill and strategy.
- “Very replayable due to the random merging of units and has lots of options to try out for different units and combinations.”
- “The skill level of merging characters keeps you on your game, and for the moment, the replay value holds its own.”
- “So little reward and 0 replayability.”
- “Eventually you'll get wrecked by level one commons. I had an epic level 6 and 3 epic 2 rare characters in my lineup, but I got wrecked by level 1 commons and sudden high ping. I can't play this game; there are better tower defense games out there.”
- “The skill level of merging characters keeps you engaged, but the replay value is lacking.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere of the game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win elements, exacerbated by frequent microtransactions that detract from the overall experience. Players express frustration over connection issues that further diminish their enjoyment and commitment to the game.
- “The frequent increase in microtransactions has created a pay-to-win atmosphere that is frustrating.”
- “Constantly seeing my score driven down due to connection issues, combined with an already heavy pay-to-win atmosphere, is pushing me to reconsider my year-long daily commitment to this game.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express a sense of frustration and disappointment, feeling that the game's design undermines their ability to engage and understand its mechanics, suggesting a lack of respect for their gaming skills.