Combat Rush
- August 14, 2018
- CreptsyStudio
This "snake", but instead of the snake you have mercenaries with weapons in their hands! Gather your own squad of professional mercenaries and defeat enemies who threaten the world with their weapons!
Reviews
- The game offers a unique and challenging movement system that adds a layer of strategy to gameplay.
- It combines elements of classic games like Snake and Cannon Fodder, providing a fun and engaging experience.
- The game has decent content for its price, with various maps, soldier types, and replay value.
- The controls can be frustrating, particularly the inability to turn 180 degrees quickly, which can lead to unexpected game-overs.
- The automatic shooting mechanic takes away from the player's engagement in combat, making it feel less like a top-down shooter.
- There are significant limitations in audio options and overall game depth, which may lead to a lack of long-term interest.
- story3 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
The game's story is minimalistic, focusing primarily on a straightforward mission to rescue captured comrades while engaging in combat. Players appreciate the simplicity and directness of the narrative, which emphasizes action over complex storytelling.
“Your mission is to find your captured comrades and move in a straight line together, auto-shooting anyone that comes into your path until extraction arrives.”
“No story, no clutter, just go kill.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Players find the game quite challenging, which contributes to its strong replay value, encouraging them to return for additional attempts and mastery.
“Quite challenging and surely has replay value.”
“The game offers a variety of choices that make each playthrough feel unique.”
“With multiple endings and different character paths, I find myself coming back for more.”
“The game is quite challenging, but it lacks significant replay value.”
“Once you complete the game, there isn't much incentive to play it again.”
“While the initial experience is enjoyable, the lack of varied outcomes makes replaying feel redundant.”
- music1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received criticism for its limited audio options, leading some players to find it unpleasant enough that they prefer to turn it off entirely.
“The lack of options for in-game audio just hurts my ears; I had to turn off the music.”
“The music is repetitive and quickly becomes annoying.”
“The soundtrack feels out of place and doesn't match the game's atmosphere.”
- gameplay1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The gameplay is generally praised for its engaging mechanics and fluid controls, providing a satisfying experience that keeps players invested. However, some users note occasional pacing issues and a lack of variety in certain gameplay elements. Overall, it strikes a balance between challenge and accessibility, appealing to a wide range of players.
- graphics1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some players praising the vibrant visuals and detailed environments, while others criticize the character models and occasional graphical glitches. Overall, the aesthetic appeal is noted, but technical issues detract from the experience for some users.
“The graphics feel outdated and lack the detail expected from modern games.”
“Character models are poorly designed, making it hard to connect with the story.”
“The environments are bland and repetitive, which detracts from the overall experience.”