Cheaters Cheetah

About

Cheaters Cheetah is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with horror and science fiction themes. It was developed by Acmore Games and was released on March 10, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

Everyone will be given ACTUAL CHEATS in this multiplayer shooter. Use wallhacks and aimbots to your advantage and dominate the other cheetahs. The winner will get to BAN all losers!

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 434 reviews

gameplay6 positive mentions

stability10 negative mentions

The game has a unique and fun concept where everyone has cheats, creating an even playing field.
Initial gameplay can be enjoyable and chaotic, reminiscent of classic FPS experiences.
There is potential for the game to evolve with more features and updates, which could enhance the overall experience.

The game suffers from a lack of players, making it difficult to find matches and leading to a dead online community.
Many players report technical issues, including crashes and bugs, which detract from the gameplay experience.
The game feels unfinished, with limited content, basic cheat options, and no significant updates since release.

gameplay
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
33%
27%
The gameplay of "cheaters cheetah" is described as innovative yet basic, with a unique twist of incorporating cheats into the multiplayer FPS experience. While some players find the concept fun and engaging, many criticize the repetitive mechanics, lack of content, and low player base, leading to a quick sense of boredom. Overall, the game shows potential but requires significant improvements to enhance its gameplay experience.
- “If there were more players and more content, I would absolutely play it; the gameplay is very fun!!!”
- “"Cheaters Cheetah" is an innovative multiplayer FPS that flips the traditional gaming script by equipping all players with cheats like aimbots and wallhacks, creating a unique and chaotic gameplay experience.”
- “The developers have revolutionized the shooter genre by making cheats a part of the gameplay.”
- “But the gameplay is flat and nobody is even playing.... the game was totally empty after 10 minutes, I gave up.”
- “Counter-Strike 2 simulator, the gameplay is very repetitive.”
- “The gameplay feels repetitive, and the mechanics are poorly executed.”
humor
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
91%
27%
The humor in the game is generally perceived as amusing and unique, providing a novelty experience for players, particularly in casual settings. However, some users feel that the humor wears off quickly and suggest that additional features could enhance the comedic aspect. Overall, while the game is considered funny, there is a desire for more depth and variety in its humorous elements.
- “This game comes off as a funny casual game for CS players, but don't be fooled... I think it has massive potential!”
- “The whole concept is funny and different/unique from the usual no cheat competitive games!”
- “Amazing game and super funny, but needs more rage features; ngl, auto strafe and trigger bot would be nice along with a skin changer.”
- “Not funny; the humor feels forced and lacks creativity.”
- “The jokes fall flat and don't resonate with the gameplay.”
- “The attempts at humor are cringeworthy and detract from the overall experience.”
stability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs, crashes, and issues with joining lobbies. Many players experience game freezes, long load times, and unreliable performance, leading to frustration and a sense that the game is not worth its price. Overall, the consensus is that while the concept is appealing, the execution suffers significantly from stability problems.
- “I have to say free is the most reasonable price for this buggy mess.”
- “Every time I do get in a lobby, my game freezes, sounds keep playing, I start getting a crazy frame time of almost 2000 ms, and the game kicks me out of the lobby.”
- “Game will not even queue me into lobbies after the tutorial, just goes to loading screen and hard freezes.”
monetization
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game has been widely criticized as a cash grab, with many players expressing disappointment over its lack of updates and community engagement shortly after release. Despite initial fun, the game's perceived unfinished state and high price point have led to refunds and a dwindling player base, suggesting that the developers prioritized profit over quality and player experience.
- “The owners seem to have used this game as a cash grab and they aren't listening to the community or updating the game.”
- “I am really disappointed because this game seemed to be something fun and new, but it is just a cash grab. On release, the game was pretty active even after some server problems, but developers just abandoned this game a week after release.”
- “It just feels odd, like one of those big company cash grabs. If the game was priced lower (e.g., 3-5 euros), it would have been an okay play, but 8 euros for this game that feels unfinished isn't a good deal.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Reviews indicate that the game's current state significantly hampers its replayability, with many players expressing disappointment and a desire for future content updates to enhance the experience. As it stands, users feel the game lacks fun and replay value, leading some to seek refunds.
- “Would make the game a lot more replayable.”
- “Hopefully content is added in the future and they make it something that can be replayable, but at this point, it really isn't worth it quite yet.”
- “I asked for a refund myself and will see if the game becomes more playable over time.”
- “It would make the game a lot more replayable.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with players reporting poor performance and frame rates ranging from 50-90 FPS on full servers, significantly lower than other titles like CS2, which runs at around 200 FPS. Many users hope for future updates to address these issues, as the current state is seen as inadequate.
- “The optimization is very bad; I'm getting 50-90 FPS on a full server, but in CS2, I have around 200 FPS.”
- “The game needs more modes and a bit of optimization, though.”
- “It didn't run right; hopefully, the optimization gets fixed.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
The graphics of the game are considered mediocre, with acceptable visuals but limited options for improvement. The art style fails to engage, and the map designs are described as dull, contributing to an overall unsatisfactory visual experience that does not justify the game's price.
- “The visuals are alright but could use some better options.”
- “The art style isn't interesting, which detracts from the overall experience.”
- “The visuals are alright, but there could be better options.”
- “On top of that, the game has zero anti-cheat, which makes sense for an hvh game, but they offer a 'legit' mode where players are only supposed to use visuals.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story is criticized for including irrelevant missions that do not contribute meaningfully to the narrative, leading to a sense of wasted effort and minimal reward in terms of experience points.
- “The story is filled with useless missions that offer no meaningful experience or progression.”
- “I found the narrative to be lacking depth, with many quests feeling like filler rather than contributing to the overall story.”
- “The missions are repetitive and fail to engage, making the story feel tedious and uninteresting.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players report a lack of grinding in the game, but express frustration over difficulties in finding matches.