Skip to main content
Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology Game Cover

About

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology is a single player and multiplayer real-time strategy game with a historical theme. It was developed by Nival and was released on September 16, 2014. It received positive reviews from players.

Return to the bloody battlefields of World War II in this epic sequel. Blitzkrieg 2 returns you to the gritty realism of WWII battles while pushing your focus into new, strategic opportunities during global war!

Skip User Reviews

83%Audience ScoreBased on 410 reviews
story13 positive mentions
grinding3 negative mentions

  • Highly immersive WW2 real-time strategy with deep tactical gameplay and challenging missions.
  • Diverse units and factions with historically inspired campaigns spanning multiple theaters of war.
  • Upgrade system rewarding unit experience and commander assignments adds strategic depth.
  • Poor pathfinding and AI issues cause units, especially tanks, to behave unpredictably and frustratingly.
  • Technical problems include frequent crashes, save/load bugs, and incompatibility with modern Windows versions without workarounds.
  • Lack of a proper skirmish mode and multiplayer server support limits replayability and social play.
  • story

    117 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is minimal, with no real plot or characters, focusing instead on mission-based narratives that vary across multiple campaigns. The dynamic campaign structure offers strategic depth through unit upgrades and reinforcement management, though mission variety and AI behavior sometimes feel limited or frustrating. Overall, while lacking a strong narrative, the story aspect supports solid, challenging, and diverse mission experiences that reward tactical planning.

    • “The campaigns are very respectable in length, being split into 4 chapters with around 20 missions each.”
    • “The dynamic campaign system of letting you play your missions per theater in any order (determining which units upgrade) as well as overall reinforcement usage affecting the final mission of each theater is an interesting system.”
    • “The final missions for each chapter are a true test of your skill, featuring massive sprawling battlefields, your entire arsenal available, and many ways to proceed towards your objectives.”
    • “In the secondary missions, you can only choose very few types of troops (in almost all of them, you can't use artillery and often you can't use tanks or aviation). Gaining grades, unlike in the previous game, didn't seem to make a huge difference in the number or types of troops I could deploy, so this new system ended up feeling more limited than the previous one where you could choose specific vehicles and artillery, making the total number a clear reflection of your grade.”
    • “It always felt like the enemy had infinite counterattacks to spam, making every mission essentially a timed mission—the worst type of mission. The only way to win was to rush your few units through the path of least resistance and try to achieve the objective as fast as possible no matter the casualties. Although I finished each scenario with about ten reinforcements left, despite doing all the missions and having fewer casualties than the enemy, I felt like I was just spamming reinforcements and sending my men to the slaughterhouse, instead of feeling like a tactical genius.”
    • “The mission design is a little brainless though.”
  • graphics

    58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are widely regarded as dated and somewhat simplistic, reflecting its age, but still acceptable and often nostalgic for fans. While not as polished or realistic as modern titles or even its predecessor in some opinions, the visuals maintain a functional charm that supports gameplay and atmosphere without detracting significantly from the overall experience.

    • “The game's graphics, whilst aged, look better than the trailer and images might make you think.”
    • “Excellent graphics for the 2005 game, even now it does not hurt the eyes.”
    • “The graphics may be at the brink of being dated but in my eyes it still looks good; damage models and vehicle wrecks mixed in among the craters of different sizes (depending on the caliber/type of bomb detonated) can make the game look like a scene for a movie.”
    • “Blitzkrieg 2 is more than 15 years old at time of writing, but even for that age if you're not someone that likes (or is willing to tolerate) that turn-of-the-millennium sprites-on-early-RTS-3D, this is probably going to look pretty awful.”
    • “The graphics have actually deteriorated, and the sounds aren't nearly as good either.”
    • “First Blitzkrieg was amazing given its day even if it did get a bit repetitive, but this is just a poor reiteration with supposedly better graphics (marginal call).”
  • gameplay

    55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its depth, strategic reinforcements system, and engaging challenge that encourages careful planning rather than rushing. While some find the mechanics iterative and enjoyable, offering varied missions and tactical options, others note issues such as outdated graphics, occasional unit glitches, and a steep difficulty with AI that can feel unfair. Overall, the gameplay is considered addictive, rewarding thoughtful play, and provides many hours of content despite some flaws.

    • “On the gameplay side, each level gives you a strike force to operate, but you can also call in reinforcements which are numerous and very useful.”
    • “At first, the mechanics seem rather simple, but after some time, you are required to think about your actions more carefully.”
    • “Gameplay is deep, offering many options for offense or defense.”
    • “This flaw combined with an enemy with AI far better than that of the first game, not only having superior (I assume infinite, through the new reinforcement mechanic) numbers but using them better through constant counterattacks, makes the game unfairly hard. It is only playable by constantly pausing, checking for red dots on the map, and ordering single units to move and shoot because, unlike the computer, you cannot be conscious simultaneously of all your units and their situation.”
    • “Weak game, lame gameplay, way too slow unit movement, very bad reinforcement system.”
    • “Also, the gameplay is too boring and units' AI is lazy.”
  • music

    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally praised for being iconic, atmospheric, and dynamic, effectively enhancing the gameplay experience with intense orchestral WWII themes. While most reviews commend the soundtrack as a standout feature, a few mention it as repetitive or less impressive compared to the original. Overall, the soundtrack is considered a strong and memorable aspect of the game.

    • “The graphic holds up okay, even to this day, because it is atmospheric and the solid soundtrack switches from calm to aggressive according to the situation.”
    • “Gameplay is punishing but addictive, and this game has all the ridiculously intense orchestral WWII game music you could want from a video game.”
    • “It has great campaign, a lot of content, great music and sounds, just an awesome game. I'm sure this one together with Knights of Honor would place as one of the best strategy games.”
    • “The only truly disappointing aspect of the game was its boring repetitive soundtrack.”
    • “I appreciate the reinforcements mechanic and the fact you can steer a plane after you called for one (unlike the 1st game) but graphically, music and vibe wise I love the first one so much more.”
    • “If you're looking for an enjoyable strategy game, don't buy this one. It's a cheap knock-off of the real series, plus they stole some of the soundtrack from the real series.”
  • replayability

    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers strong replayability, enhanced by both its engaging multiplayer and campaigns, making it enjoyable over long periods. Minor historical inaccuracies are present but serve to improve playability rather than detract from the experience. Overall, it is considered more playable and rewarding than many competitors.

    • “Owned and played through before Steam but worth the buy at a good price and has great replay value.”
    • “Have been playing it for years and still holds its replay value with great multiplayer and campaigns.”
    • “It really adds to the replayability.”
  • grinding

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is notably time-consuming and can be frustrating, with some players experiencing extensive sessions without progress. Additionally, save issues during grinding sessions can lead to lost progress, compounding the challenge. Strategies often rely heavily on artillery and luck, making the grind feel repetitive and demanding.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Was playing fine and enjoying it but after 3 hours grinding on the Ruhr Pocket (Allies), it decided not to save and then other saves wouldn't load at all, either stuck loading or just crashing the game.”
    • “Usually either very grindy or requires extensive artillery prefiring and a lot of luck.”
  • emotional

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game evokes strong nostalgic and emotional connections, with players recalling heartfelt childhood memories despite occasional gameplay frustrations, such as unit attack delays. Many find it a wholesome and enduring experience that brings back fond feelings.

    • “As a child, when I first got this on disc the files were corrupted, I cried—I had bought it with my own money.”
    • “Wholesome childhood game I find myself playing again and again.”
  • stability

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game runs well on Linux via Proton, but exhibits occasional bugs with aircraft units disappearing upon arrival and some issues with unit pathfinding and AI, especially when managing large groups or navigating difficult terrain. Overall stability is decent but shows minor quirks typical of an older title.

    • “Aircraft (ground attack craft especially, but also paratrooper transports) are somewhat buggy and will sometimes leave the battlefield as soon as they arrive.”
    • “The unit pathfinding and general AI are a little bit buggy. This is expected in an older game, but it becomes noticeable when massing units or trying to make tanks go through heavy object areas.”
  • humor

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is appreciated, especially through the AI's unpredictable and destructive behavior, which adds amusing moments for players with a sense of humor. However, this mix of funny and annoying actions may vary across different campaigns.

    • “AI will give you some good laughs if you have a sense of humor.”
    • “They don't care about roads and destroy everything, which is kinda funny and annoying.”
  • atmosphere

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is praised for its enduring, immersive quality, supported by solid graphics and a dynamic soundtrack that shifts appropriately between calm and intense moments.

    • “The graphics hold up well even today, creating an atmospheric experience enhanced by a dynamic soundtrack that shifts from calm to aggressive based on the situation.”
    • “I love its atmosphere and overall gameplay.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology is a real-time strategy game with historical theme.

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology is available on PC and Windows.

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology was released on September 16, 2014.

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology was developed by Nival.

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology for its story but disliked it for its grinding.

Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Full Mojo Rampage, Sudden Strike 4, Men of War: Assault Squad, Order of War, Blitzkrieg 3 and others.