Barro 22

About

Barro 22 is a single player and multiplayer casual racing game. It was developed by SC Jogos and was released on November 5, 2021. It received very positive reviews from players.

Barro 22 is a racing game with a toy car / go kart style, the next gen for Barro Racing now with the tracks from the first game of the series.

+14

Skip User Reviews

93%Audience ScoreBased on 382 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

gameplay7 negative mentions

Barro 22 offers simple, accessible arcade-style racing gameplay that is easy to pick up and enjoyable for casual players and families.
The game includes a variety of 25 tracks and 7 different vehicles, adding some diversity to the experience, along with local multiplayer for up to 4 players, enhancing social fun.
It provides a satisfying achievement system that is easy to complete, making it appealing for achievement hunters and those seeking quick gaming sessions.

The graphics are basic, sometimes outdated, and lack polish, with some players finding the visual and audio presentation bland or repetitive.
Gameplay can become repetitive and monotonous quickly, with limited depth, unchallenging AI, and little innovation across the series' installments.
Technical issues such as poor optimization, clunky controls, and lack of online multiplayer mode detract from the overall experience.

gameplay
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
67%
21%
The gameplay of Barro 22 is generally straightforward and accessible, offering easy-to-learn mechanics that appeal to casual players. However, many find it repetitive and lacking depth or polish, which may lead to diminished engagement over extended play, especially for those seeking a more challenging or refined racing experience. Despite this, some users praise its nostalgic charm and arcade-style fun, considering it a solid and enjoyable racing game.
- “Gameplay itself is straightforward and easy to pick up, with intuitive controls that allow players to jump right into the action.”
- “Barro 22 delivers a brief but complete experience with straightforward gameplay and a manageable achievement list.”
- “Barro 22 offers a well-balanced blend of arcade-style fun and strategic racing.”
- “While this simplicity is part of the game’s charm, it also means that the driving mechanics don’t provide the depth or challenge that more hardcore racing fans might crave.”
- “With limited variety in gameplay and mechanics, it can grow stale—especially if you aim for extended solo play.”
- “The game presents an interesting environment and ideas, but the slow pace and repetitive mechanics made it hard to stay engaged.”
graphics
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
73%
10%
Barro 22 features simple, colorful, and vibrant graphics with a playful toy car aesthetic that emphasizes charm and nostalgic arcade fun rather than high-fidelity realism. While visuals are not cutting-edge and nighttime settings are less polished, the bright, cartoony style and unique track designs effectively complement the casual racing experience. Some reviews praise the visuals as impressive for an indie title, though others note occasional inconsistencies and low-quality textures.
- “For an indie title, the visuals are clean and colorful.”
- “The environments are bright and cheerful, with a deliberate toy-like aesthetic that captures the feel of childhood play rather than realistic racing.”
- “Graphically, the game leans into a bright, cartoony style suited to its toy car vibe.”
- “Additionally, players are advised to stick to daytime settings, as the nighttime visuals are not well-executed.”
- “The graphics are relatively low quality, but at least there's a bit of variation.”
- “Don't get me wrong it has great ideas if it would stop being so mediocre and use the same graphics and design on all the levels.”
optimization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
Optimization for the game is generally good, running smoothly on most PCs with low system requirements, though it experiences performance issues on very low-end hardware like older Pentium i processors. However, some users criticize the optimization as poor compared to higher-profile titles. Overall, it performs well for the majority of players but struggles on outdated systems.
- “Low system requirements: it runs smoothly on almost any PC.”
- “A review mentioned performance issues on extremely low-end hardware (“lags on a Pentium i”), but otherwise, it runs smoothly.”
- “Each vehicle has distinct handling and performance characteristics, requiring me to adapt my driving style.”
- “Worst optimization since Crysis.”
- “I'm at a loss for words at just how poorly optimized this game is.”
- “A review mentioned performance issues on extremely low-end hardware ('lags on a Pentium i'), but otherwise, it runs smoothly.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
45%
33%
The story aspect is widely regarded as nonexistent or very weak, with some users dismissing it entirely and others finding it unremarkable compared to even mediocre love stories. Overall, the game lacks a meaningful or engaging narrative.
- “Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “I'm on a quest of at least trying every game in my library, of which I got plenty from all kinds of bundles, not all though.”
- “No story.”
- “What story?”
- “Twilight was a better love story than this.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The game's music is limited, featuring only a couple of tracks mainly for menus, with little to no music during actual gameplay. While the soundtrack is described as upbeat and fitting for the race environments, many players find the lack of in-game music detracts from the experience and recommend playing their own background music. Sound effects receive mixed reactions, often viewed as irritating.
- “The soundtrack is upbeat and catchy, complementing the lively race environments without becoming intrusive or repetitive.”
- “Matches are quick and, like the rest of the franchise, there's no music.”
- “I recommend playing your own music in the background to make the experience more enjoyable.”
- “The game has only two soundtracks from what I can see, one for the menu and one for the levels.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
83%
Grinding in the game is notably present, with some players finding it somewhat grindy but manageable, while others suggest it requires significant effort or even automation. The limited content contributes to repetitive tasks, making the grind feel more like achievement farming than engaging gameplay.
- “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a will to live for grinding.”
- “The inclusion of Steam trading cards is just misleading—it should be advertised or banned as a farming game because there simply isn't enough content.”
- “Easy, but grindy, achievements, 100% in about 3 hours.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a lighthearted and amusing humor, with enjoyable moments like discovering boost zones and quirky elements such as the boost key binding. Playing with friends adds to the fun, making it an entertaining experience.
- “Funny game!”
- “It is hilarious to play with a friend during class (speaking from experience).”
- “Boost is still available as special zones are found in some tracks that speed you up, and it is funny finding the boost key binding under controls.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users highlight that the game's graphics significantly enhance its atmosphere, creating an immersive and visually engaging experience.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the game offers substantial content that enhances its replayability, encouraging multiple playthroughs. The variety and depth keep the experience engaging over time.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game’s stability is generally well-received, offering a smooth and enjoyable casual experience with reliable split-screen play. While some minor glitches and track shortcuts are noted, they add playful charm rather than detracting from overall stability.
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization approach is widely criticized for being unethical, with accusations of the developer repeatedly releasing unoriginal content on Steam primarily to generate easy profit.