Barro GT

About

Barro GT is a single player and multiplayer casual racing game. It was developed by SC Jogos and was released on May 19, 2022. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Barro GT" is the latest edition of the toy car racing series, offering 26 types of vehicles and 17 new tracks. The game features improved time trial mode with real-time leaderboard competition, and supports up to 4-player local split screen and 20-car races. Note that the GT version excludes jumping found in the original. Help keep the leaderboard server alive through donations.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 646 reviews

gameplay18 positive mentions

story7 negative mentions

The game offers a large variety of vehicles and detailed maps, providing a nostalgic arcade racing experience.
Easy achievements make it a fun choice for casual gamers and achievement hunters.
The game runs smoothly on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wide audience.

Gameplay is repetitive and lacks depth, with minimal challenge from AI opponents.
Controls can feel clunky and unresponsive, detracting from the overall racing experience.
The graphics and sound design are basic, making the game feel like a low-effort asset flip.

gameplay
90 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
68%
12%
The gameplay of "Barro GT" has received mixed to negative feedback, with many reviewers noting its shallow mechanics, repetitive track layouts, and lack of challenge. While some players appreciate the simplicity and find it enjoyable for casual play, others criticize it for being boring and unoriginal, with basic controls and uninspired design. Overall, the game seems to cater to those looking for a lighthearted racing experience rather than deep or engaging gameplay.
- “I love everything about this game, from the mechanics to the goofy graphics, and I would definitely recommend this game if you're looking for a fun little break from work or something!”
- “Gameplay emphasizes exploration and light interaction with the environment, prioritizing narrative and ambiance over complex mechanics, consistent with the relatively brief playtime.”
- “The true strength of 'barro gt' lies in its driving mechanics.”
- “Don't go in expecting deep mechanics or tons of content.”
- “The tracks are uninspired, the visuals are bland, and the overall gameplay feels rushed and repetitive.”
- “Worst of all, the gameplay itself is just boring—no real challenge, no variety, and nothing to keep you coming back.”
graphics
79 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
73%
11%
The graphics in the "barro" series are generally described as simplistic and low-poly, often compared unfavorably to more advanced titles, with some players appreciating their charm while others find them bland or reminiscent of older games. While there are slight improvements in detail and variety in the latest entry, many reviews highlight that the visuals remain basic and could benefit from further refinement. Overall, the graphics are seen as adequate for the game's fun and engaging gameplay, appealing to those who enjoy arcade-style racing without the need for high-end visuals.
- “The graphics and physics in this racing game far surpass most triple-A titles.”
- “The low-poly graphics are simple but clean, and they give the game a nice charm without overcomplicating things.”
- “I could keep typing more paragraphs about why this game is so good... impeccable graphics, 21 geniusly designed tracks making the replay value of this game 10/10.”
- “Well, the game's graphics were worse than Minecraft, but the game was pretty nice and I got it for free.”
- “The graphics are very simple, and in their simplicity, they're also cute.”
- “Ugly graphics, horrible controls, and no feeling of 'driving' at all.”
music
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
64%
11%
The music aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting the absence of background music during racing, which leads to a monotonous experience dominated by engine sounds. While the menu music is praised for its nostalgic quality reminiscent of the Sega Genesis era, the overall sound design is considered simplistic and lacking in variety, detracting from the game's long-term appeal. Players express a desire for more engaging music during races to enhance the overall atmosphere and enjoyment.
- “It's much more addictive, and the music is fantastic!”
- “The menu music is amazing!”
- “The sound effects and music complement the gameplay nicely, adding to the immersive experience without being distracting.”
- “But there is no background music in the racing part, so you just hear the 'wrrr' from the car for the entire race, which gets kinda annoying after a while.”
- “The game could use some more music while racing and not just in the main menu, which would help with the rather dull and simple sound effects that get really boring really quickly.”
- “However, the minimal presentation, lack of music, and repetitive tracks limit its long-term appeal.”
story
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
61%
27%
The reviews indicate a stark divide in the perception of the game's story, with many users criticizing it for lacking any narrative or plot, often stating "no story" or expressing disappointment in its absence. Conversely, some appreciate the game's atmospheric exploration and subtle environmental storytelling, which encourages player interpretation rather than a traditional narrative structure. Overall, the consensus leans towards a significant deficiency in story content.
- “Barro gt is an indie game focusing on atmospheric exploration and immersive storytelling.”
- “The story is presented subtly through environmental storytelling and indirect narrative cues, encouraging player interpretation and focusing on atmosphere rather than detailed plot.”
- “The story is presented subtly through environmental storytelling and indirect narrative cues, encouraging player interpretation and focusing on atmosphere rather than detailed plot.”
- “☑️ this game has no story”
- “☑ no story”
- “there is still no progression system, no soul, no story, no reason to play.”
optimization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The optimization of the game is mixed; while many users report smooth performance even on low-end PCs and appreciate the quick race format, others experience significant performance issues, indicating a lack of consistency in optimization. Overall, the game demonstrates good technical performance for most players, but some users encounter severe problems that detract from the experience.
- “The controls are easy to grasp, the performance is smooth even on low-end PCs, and the short races make it ideal for quick play sessions.”
- “The game runs smoothly, with no notable technical issues.”
- “On Steam, Barro GT runs smoothly, showcasing the developer's attention to performance optimization.”
- “Horrible performance even with no GPU being listed in the requirements and constantly breaks.”
- “Truly, an unoptimized mess.”
- “Imho, the cars should also be divided into performance classes because it is just silly that cars looking so different all behave exactly the same.”
grinding
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
36%
55%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized, with many users describing it as tedious and excessively time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant effort akin to having a "second life." While some appreciate the inclusion of actual race tracks and achievements, the overall sentiment suggests that the game feels more like a cash grab focused on farming achievements and trading cards rather than offering a genuine gaming experience.
- “A little grindy.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Instead, I lost myself grinding gold on every single track like my life depended on it.”
- “Still an asset flip designed for Steam achievements and trading cards farming.”
humor
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as hit-or-miss, with some players finding it amusing in moments, particularly with funny physics and unexpected quirks, while others feel it quickly becomes repetitive and lacks depth. Many reviews suggest that the humor is more suited for casual play, providing brief laughs rather than sustained enjoyment, especially given the low price point. Overall, while there are funny moments, they may not justify the game's value for all players.
- “Funny and enjoyable.”
- “It is very funny when you are in first place, then stop and everyone gets slowed down or flies around the map!”
- “You can get all the achievements in less than 2 hours, and its graphics are not good, but enough to have a funny moment to release stress.”
atmosphere
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
14%
29%
The atmosphere in Barro gt is praised for its immersive and moody qualities, particularly during night and rain, with minimalist visuals and a muted color palette that enhance the introspective experience. The game emphasizes environmental storytelling and indirect narrative cues, appealing to players who enjoy contemplative, narrative-driven indie games. However, some reviewers noted that there are areas for improvement in this aspect.
- “Barro GT is an indie game focusing on atmospheric exploration and immersive storytelling.”
- “The story is presented subtly through environmental storytelling and indirect narrative cues, encouraging player interpretation and focusing on atmosphere rather than detailed plot.”
- “The game features minimalist visuals with muted color schemes, enhancing the introspective and moody atmosphere.”
- “There are a few things that could be improved, one of those things being the atmosphere.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The monetization aspect of the game is mixed, with some players appreciating the absence of microtransactions, while others criticize the reliance on in-game currency and the presence of seasonal events and collaborations that feel exploitative. Concerns have also been raised about unethical practices, including the use of fake reviews and asset flips, suggesting a trend of cash grabs within the game's ecosystem. Overall, the monetization strategy appears to prioritize profit over player experience.
- “No microtransactions, no drama, just you, your weird Lego car, and vibes.”
- “Seasonal events, collaborations with obscure franchises, in-game currency, and microtransactions allow you to unlock cars and parts, but you can't win just by playing the game; there's barely any game at all, as everything revolves around in-game currency.”
- “Seasonal events, collaborations with obscure franchises, in-game currency, microtransactions, unlock cars, unlock parts; you can't win by just playing the game. There's barely any game at all, everything is tied to in-game currency.”
- “SC games have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, either through this account or through closely linked/alternate accounts.”
- “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear at almost exactly the same time, very shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game boasts exceptional replayability, with users highlighting its nearly infinite replay value due to impeccable graphics and 21 expertly designed tracks, resulting in a perfect score of 10/10 for replay value.
- “This game is infinitely replayable, offering a fresh experience every time.”
- “The replay value is exceptional, with 21 brilliantly designed tracks that keep you coming back for more.”
- “I could keep typing more paragraphs about why this game is so good; the impeccable graphics and engaging gameplay make it a 10/10 for replayability.”
- “The game lacks any real replay value; once you've completed it, there's little incentive to go back.”
- “After finishing the main story, I found no compelling reasons to replay the game. It feels like a one-and-done experience.”
- “The choices you make don't significantly alter the outcome, which really diminishes the replayability factor.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, the game's stability is generally decent, with minor color glitches reported on some maps. While some players noted a lack of excitement compared to previous titles, the presence of visual bugs is more pronounced than in earlier entries in the series.
- “Coming off of the fast-paced F22, GT seems a bit slow and boring, and it's the first in the series where I noticed glitches and visual bugs.”
- “There are little color glitches on some maps, but nothing serious.”
- “Less buggy, but overall a decent old-gen game.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The emotional aspect of the game is polarizing; while some users find it deep and impactful, others express a strong disconnection, indicating a lack of engagement with the game's emotional narrative.
- “This game is deep and emotional.”
- “deep and emotional”