Barro F22

About

Barro F22 is a single player and multiplayer casual racing game. It was developed by SC Jogos and was released on April 25, 2022. It received positive reviews from players.

Barro F22 is the new generation for the fast version of Barro, now with a new style of race tracks but, with the good old toy car/ go kart arcade style!

Skip User Reviews

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 161 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

gameplay6 negative mentions

Fast-paced, accessible, and enjoyable arcade racing gameplay that is easy to pick up and fun for short sessions.
Vibrant and colorful graphics with a charming toy car aesthetic and smooth performance on low-end hardware.
Includes multiple real-world inspired tracks and cars with local multiplayer support for up to four players in split-screen mode.

Lack of depth and polish in game mechanics, including inconsistent physics and predictable AI making races monotonous.
Repetitive content with cars that differ mostly cosmetically and absence of meaningful career progression or customization options.
No dedicated online multiplayer mode and basic menus/interface with technical limitations like low maximum resolution and some glitches.

gameplay
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
60%
24%
The gameplay of Barro F22 is simple, accessible, and characterized by fast-paced arcade racing loops that offer casual fun, especially in split-screen mode. However, it suffers from repetitive mechanics, lack of depth, and limited customization, which may reduce long-term engagement despite its energetic pace and colorful presentation. Overall, it provides enjoyable short-term entertainment but can feel stagnant over time.
- “The gameplay structure of Barro F22 revolves around traditional racing loops but is characterized by a distinct arcade simplicity.”
- “The split-screen mode works well enough for casual gatherings, where the simplicity of the gameplay encourages lighthearted competition rather than tense rivalry.”
- “It offers accessible entertainment through simple mechanics, colorful visuals, and fast gameplay loops.”
- “The most significant issue is the lack of polish and depth in its mechanics.”
- “The gameplay in barro f22 is where it struggles the most.”
- “While it starts off with promise, I found myself quickly losing interest due to repetitive mechanics and lack of engagement.”
graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
60%
7%
The graphics of Barro F22 are minimalist and vibrant, featuring bright colors, simple lighting, and low-poly environments that create a charming, toy-like aesthetic. While not flashy, the visuals are functional and appeal through their simplicity and energetic style, enhancing the fast-paced racing experience. The game is accessible on low-spec devices, making its colorful graphics a standout feature.
- “The visuals retain the clean, almost toy-like aesthetic that defines the series, with bright colors, simple lighting, and low-poly environments that convey charm despite their modest scope.”
- “Barro F22 provides a fast-paced and exciting racing experience with its vibrant graphics, energetic soundtrack, and multiple tracks.”
- “The graphics are simple and colorful, with fun and quick gameplay.”
- “In this one, I feel like the graphics have been improved.”
music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The game's energetic soundtrack features upbeat electronic loops that complement the fast-paced gameplay and keep players motivated. However, music is absent during races, with only engine noises present, prompting some players to recommend playing their own music for a more enjoyable experience.
- “The soundtrack and sound effects are simple but energetic, matching the tone of the game with upbeat electronic loops and punchy engine noises that emphasize the fast-paced rhythm.”
- “The music pumps you up and keeps you motivated as you race against opponents.”
- “The soundtrack is energetic and perfectly matches the high-speed gameplay.”
- “I recommend playing your own music in the background to make the experience more pleasant and avoid being limited to the engine noise, which isn't particularly melodious.”
- “Imagine not putting music in a game.”
- “The menu rick rolls you by having music, but then there is no music.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect is widely criticized for being virtually non-existent or poorly developed, with some users even comparing it unfavorably to simplistic love stories like Twilight. Overall, players find the narrative lacking or irrelevant.
- “What story?”
- “No story.”
- “Twilight was a better love story than this.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Grinding in this game is repetitive and tedious, resembling many similar titles focused on card farming and profile boosts. It requires significant time investment, possibly the use of macros, and strong patience to endure.
- “Another copy of Barro—a series of identical games that don’t differ from each other at all, made just for farming trading cards and a +1 to your profile.”
- “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a will to live for grinding.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's replayability is driven primarily by its engaging time trial mode, which motivates players to improve their lap times in quick, challenging sessions. However, introducing more customization options could further boost long-term player engagement and replay value.
- “The time trial mode is perhaps the strongest part of the game, as it highlights the appeal of shaving milliseconds off lap times and encourages replayability through short bursts of challenge.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy is widely criticized for unethical practices, including releasing low-quality asset flips shortly after launch and using fake accounts to generate misleading positive reviews. This approach is seen as a cheap cash grab, exploiting Steam's platform with minimal original content.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is well-optimized, delivering smooth performance even on low-end hardware despite repetitive visuals. The car models have a miniature, toy-like aesthetic, contributing to a lightweight and efficient design.
- “The cars have a miniature model feel to them, as if part of a plastic toy set, and the racetracks—though repetitive in visual variety—maintain a smooth performance even on low-end hardware.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game experiences minor technical issues, including occasional frame rate drops and glitches, which slightly affect its overall stability.
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users generally express frustration with the emotional experience, highlighting how poor driving physics lead to unfair and aggravating gameplay moments that detract from enjoyment.