Skip to main content

Atlas Reactor

Atlas Reactor is one of a kind. An incredibly inventive, addictive and compelling online fast-paced turn-based tactical game. It looks fantastic, plays great and has so little to bring it down that it's well worth anybody’s time.
83%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
monetization, grinding
84% User Score Based on 3,018 reviews
Critic Score 80%Based on 6 reviews

Platforms

PCPCWindowsWindowsCloudCloudNVIDIA GeForce NOWNVIDIA GeForce NOW

About

"Atlas Reactor" is a competitive PvP game with 4v4 team battles and fast-paced combat. Choose from a variety of customizable Freelancers and compete in modes such as Solo, PvP, Ranked, and Custom games. The Recruit-a-Friend program offers bonus loot and access passes for new players.

Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
Atlas Reactor screenshot
+15

84%
Audience ScoreBased on 3,024 reviews
gameplay183 positive mentions
monetization23 negative mentions

  • Unique gameplay that combines turn-based strategy with simultaneous actions, making matches fast-paced and engaging.
  • Diverse roster of characters (Freelancers) with distinct abilities, allowing for various playstyles and strategies.
  • Fair free-to-play model that allows players to earn characters and cosmetics through gameplay without being pay-to-win.
  • Low player base leading to longer matchmaking times, especially for ranked matches.
  • Some characters may feel unbalanced, leading to frustration in matches.
  • Initial learning curve can be steep for new players, making it difficult to grasp the mechanics quickly.
  • gameplay
    557 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Atlas Reactor is widely praised for its unique blend of turn-based strategy and MOBA elements, drawing comparisons to XCOM and games like League of Legends. Players appreciate the simultaneous turn mechanics that encourage strategic thinking and teamwork, making matches fast-paced and engaging. While some find the learning curve steep and the tutorial lacking in depth, the overall consensus is that the gameplay is addictive, enjoyable, and offers a refreshing take on the genre.

    • “The gameplay is amazing and there is a decent variety of characters that keeps each game unique and fresh.”
    • “Gameplay is tight and quick.”
    • “The gameplay itself is very solid and the tutorial was very informative of all the game's basic mechanics.”
    • “It's entertaining for a few days, but by day 3 or 4 you've seen everything the game has to offer, and unfortunately it's just not deep enough mechanically to establish a serious competitive community for e-sports, nor is it entertaining to watch, or as easy to get into as a casual, the way Fortnite, Overwatch, and League are.”
    • “The gameplay is solid and no two matches ever feel the same due to the constant change in tactics on both teams.”
  • graphics
    181 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising its vibrant, cartoonish art style reminiscent of Borderlands, and noting that it is visually appealing and well-animated. However, some players criticize the graphics as dated and lacking in detail, suggesting that they do not meet modern standards. Overall, while the visuals are generally considered good for a free-to-play title, there are calls for improved graphical options and optimization.

    • “The graphics are fantastic for a free-to-play game, and not too taxing on a mid-range PC either.”
    • “Graphically and visually stunning with great taunting effects; this game is great to play casually and competitively.”
    • “The art style is unique, in a cartoony Borderlands style that is fun to watch, and I love each map's unique music and the changes that each phase and taunt cause.”
    • “The graphics are dated, with old looking menus and antique animation.”
    • “The game uses a cartoony art style but it looks extremely dated.”
    • “However the main beef with this game lies in the technical and graphical aspects of the game.”
  • story
    82 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is described as a dystopian narrative with interesting characters, but it suffers from pacing issues, often shifting focus between different characters and leaving players wanting more continuity. While there are daily missions and seasonal quests that contribute to the lore, some players feel the overall storytelling is lacking depth and coherence, with a few expressing frustration over the minimal tutorial and narrative engagement. Despite these criticisms, the character backstories and humorous elements are appreciated, suggesting that the game has potential for a richer narrative experience.

    • “The background story for this game was a dystopian, interesting one.”
    • “A story line of this crazy game of corporations and espionage, world domination, and freelancers trying to earn money is available.”
    • “My favorite feature probably is how charismatic all the freelancers can be; they all feel unique, are wonderfully voice-acted, and have a bunch of taunts to display all of that personality.”
    • “It took months to get the story moving in season updates.”
    • “At points, the story moved on to completely different characters and it left you wondering, 'But what about these other two we had been reading about?' What happened to them? It would take almost another season to get the story focus back onto them.”
    • “There is no story.”
  • monetization
    62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its fair approach that primarily features cosmetic microtransactions rather than pay-to-win elements. However, there is a consensus that the game's advertising and marketing efforts have been lacking, which has contributed to a dwindling player base and limited awareness of its potential. While some players find the monetization acceptable, others criticize the presence of microtransactions in a buy-to-play model, suggesting that it detracts from the overall experience.

    • “The monetization method is fair and rarely feels grindy.”
    • “Overall, good game, good free-to-play model with microtransactions that don't really affect you too much.”
    • “Yes, there are microtransactions, but they are purely cosmetic items only, nothing that will help you in-game.”
    • “One thing you have to bear in mind is that this game has microtransactions and they aren't low priced.”
    • “You can tell that the game was developed cheaply in order to sell skins and make money from people who dump cash into microtransactions.”
    • “My friends who haven't purchased the game are limited to a very low amount of characters, and with no microtransactions my friends are forced to either stick with their few options or purchase the entire cast for the one or two characters they want to play.”
  • humor
    57 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players highlighting the hilarious characters, witty voice lines, and amusing gameplay moments that enhance the overall experience. Many reviews note the charm and comedic timing of the freelancers, making it a fun choice for playing with friends. While some critiques mention unfunny commentary or moments, the general consensus is that the game's humor is a standout feature that contributes significantly to its appeal.

    • “Not only was this game stylish and wacky in its presentation, but I found it to be very charming and funny.”
    • “The characters have snarky or cool things to say when they unleash their attacks, and when they do and when you get someone shouting 'taste the flames of my rage' before unleashing a miniature nuclear blast which totally whiffs because you didn't predict things correctly, it's kinda funny.”
    • “The voice acting in particular is full of humor, and each character has his or her (or its) own personality driven by this excellent voice acting.”
    • “Unfunny commentary.”
    • “Oh, and not funny.”
  • music
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its catchy and immersive qualities, particularly in relation to character design and gameplay dynamics. However, others criticize certain tracks as repetitive or annoying, especially in the tutorial and main menu. Overall, while the soundtrack has its highlights, many players feel it could benefit from more variety and refinement.

    • “The music is super catchy, and I admit I bob my head to the theme/main page song while waiting for games.”
    • “The art style is unique, in a cartoony Borderlands style that is fun to watch, and I love each map's unique music and the changes that each phase and taunt cause.”
    • “The characters are full of personality with chirpy music and voice acting to suit.”
    • “The music in the tutorial and the main menu are an audible form of epilepsy which highly triggered me.”
    • “Music is a weak spot; maps could be more diverse, but hey, this is just a beta, under fast developing.”
    • “[Tutorial stages are a waste of HDD/SSD space; the music is annoying and repetitive, the free-to-play options are insufficient and, by some strange logic, paying for the game unlocks microtransactions.]”
  • character development
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is characterized by a mix of inventive and generic designs, with many players appreciating the variety and unique personalities of the characters. While some critiques highlight issues with dialogue and certain character designs, the overall consensus is that the character design is visually appealing and contributes positively to the gameplay experience. However, the lack of deeper character progression and strategy in gameplay has been noted as a limitation.

    • “The art style and the character design are fantastic, and all the different characters offer great variability.”
    • “Character design is brilliant; the game seems very balanced, and I'm enjoying it more and more each time I play it!”
    • “Great character designs and a great idea of strategic concepts!”
    • “The sorest point for me currently is the new character development.”
    • “The character designs range from inventive to generic, and the dialogue can sometimes be grating and steeped in pop culture references that have gone past their expiration date.”
    • “My biggest gripe with the game is the character design; a couple of them are right proper bag jobs.”
  • grinding
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed feedback from players. While some find the grind for in-game currency and character unlocks to be tedious, especially for free-to-play users, others appreciate the balance of challenges and rewards that make the grinding feel manageable. Overall, the monetization model is considered fair, with options to purchase characters alleviating some of the grind, though many players still feel that significant time investment is required to unlock everything.

    • “The grind is rewarding and not overly tedious.”
    • “Unlocking new features through grinding feels satisfying.”
    • “The balance of grinding keeps the game engaging without feeling overwhelming.”
    • “No single-player campaign, a really dead PvP side, and a ranked structure that relies too heavily on grinding for in-game currency in regular PvP or bot matches just to unlock enough heroes to reach ranked.”
    • “One con the game has is the insane amount of grinding required to do if you're free to play, like me.”
    • “Essentially, they made it earnable in-game but made it all so tedious to earn that most will just pay for it.”
  • optimization
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and enjoyable gameplay, while others report significant technical issues and limited graphics options. Although many acknowledge that the game runs well on various systems, there are still complaints about bugs and poor optimization, particularly for older machines. Overall, it appears that while the game shows promise, further optimization is needed to enhance the experience for all players.

    • “The game was optimized, the matches were just the right length of time to hit that sweet spot, without being way too long or short, keeping you on the edge of your seat from turn 2/10.”
    • “It's got a large and interesting roster of characters, and is well optimized.”
    • “The game is very well optimized, with only a few crashes here and there.”
    • “The graphics options in the game are bare bones as well, so older machines may have serious issues running the game because it is poorly optimized.”
    • “And it is a terrible optimization of a game with simple features and simple graphics.”
    • “This game has absolutely terrible performance, which is odd, because Trove was an incredibly solid game tech-wise.”
  • stability
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting frequent bugs, crashes, and performance issues, particularly during loading screens and matches. While some users noted minor glitches and a few game-breaking bugs, others experienced severe freezing and crashes that impacted their overall enjoyment. Overall, the game appears to be in a buggy state, with ongoing issues that detract from the experience, though some players still find it enjoyable despite these problems.

    • “The game runs smoothly with nearly no glitches or bugs at all.”
    • “Stability is impressive; I rarely encounter any issues during gameplay.”
    • “Overall, the game is very stable, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
    • “It is incredibly buggy: I encountered minor bugs every match with actual game-breaking bugs from time to time.”
    • “Game is alright but the launcher is buggy as hell, with a whole lot of errors for updating, freezes, and crashes all the time... get it together.”
    • “It's so terribly buggy and crashes just about every 8 seconds.”
  • replayability
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players consistently praise the game's high replayability, highlighting its unique mechanics and short game duration of around 15 minutes, which encourages repeated play. The combination of easy-to-learn yet challenging gameplay, along with diverse character designs and mechanics, contributes to a rich and engaging experience that players feel is worth the investment. Overall, the game is regarded as having exceptional replay value, making each session feel fresh and rewarding.

    • “Short games (~15 mins) with unlimited replayability.”
    • “It's a good game with wonderful replayability, so it's not like you're throwing away money.”
    • “It's unique, and every round is different, so it offers a ton of replay value.”
  • atmosphere
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is highly praised for its immersive quality, blending cyberpunk aesthetics with well-designed graphics, sound, and character personalities. Players appreciate the harmonious integration of various elements, such as music and maps, which contribute to a satisfying and engaging experience, making it enjoyable even for those who typically don't favor strategy games. Overall, the atmosphere is described as fun, competitive, and conducive to a chill gaming experience.

    • “Love the gameplay, love the concept, love the artwork, love the cyberpunk atmosphere.”
    • “The graphics, sound, atmosphere, and overall production quality are very nice.”
    • “The game's atmosphere—graphics, character personalities, music, maps, etc.—all flow really well together to make the game more immersive.”
    • “The game's atmosphere - graphics, character personalities, music, maps, etc. - all flow really well together to make the game more immersive.”
    • “>maps/atmosphere=6”
    • “The graphics, sound, atmosphere, all-around production quality is very nice.”
  • emotional
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, highlighting its unique qualities and the heartbreak felt over its impending shutdown. The heartfelt responses reflect appreciation for the developers' engagement, suggesting that despite the sadness, the experience is worth exploring.

    • “One of a kind game, heartbreaking moment when it went down.”
    • “I can't believe that this game will just shut down; it's really heartbreaking to know that.”
    • “My new review is more heartfelt, but I did decide to give it a thumbs up since the dev took time out of their day to reply to it.”

Buy Atlas Reactor

25h Median play time
214h Average play time
9-96h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 19 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Atlas Reactor

Gigantic Image
Battlerite Image
Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game ImageInfinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game ImageInfinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game Image
Laser League Image
Awesomenauts - the 2D moba Image
Battlerite Royale Image
SUPERVIVE Image
Fractured Space ImageFractured Space ImageFractured Space Image
Knockout City Image
Battleborn Image