akda

About

akda is a single player casual puzzle game. It was developed by Snkl Studio and was released on December 27, 2017. It received negative reviews from players.

A simple physical puzzle.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

14%

Audience ScoreBased on 36 reviews

music3 positive mentions

gameplay2 negative mentions

The game features a minimalistic design and simple mechanics that some players may find appealing.
The music is noted to be pleasant and adds a nice touch to the gameplay experience.
Some players appreciate the challenge of the puzzles, even if they are frustrating at times.

The physics are inconsistent and often lead to unpredictable outcomes, making the game feel luck-based rather than skill-based.
Many players report that the controls are frustratingly imprecise, leading to repeated failures and a lack of enjoyment.
The game lacks depth and replay value, with many levels feeling either too easy or frustratingly difficult due to poor design.

gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
40%
40%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it fun and appreciating its minimalistic design, while others criticize it for inconsistent mechanics and confusing elements that detract from the overall experience. Notably, issues with physics and unclear objectives have been highlighted as significant flaws.
- “I really liked the fact that the developer chose to employ a minimalistic approach in the whole game, starting from the gameplay itself and finishing in all the other aspects.”
- “Boring gameplay.”
- “A confusing timing game disguised as a puzzle game, with noticeable core mechanics flaws like irregularities with the physics, making it difficult to decide if your current guessed configuration was correct or not.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The graphics of the game have been criticized for their low quality and lack of customization options, leaving players unable to improve the visuals. Many reviewers feel that the game's graphics do not meet the expectations typically associated with PC gaming.
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- “There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low-quality graphics.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high-quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
20%
20%
The music in the game is generally described as pleasant and minimalistic, fitting the overall simplistic design. While it enhances the experience, it is not considered particularly memorable or special, serving more as a background element than a standout feature.
- “Nice background music and there is no luck needed.”
- “The music's minimalistic too, as it is the whole game approach - you can only click on continue or play a new game, and everything will be reduced to the minimum: white backgrounds, black objects, and so on.”
- “Music is not that bad for a puzzle game and the idea is not that bad either, although it's not special at all.”
- “The music is minimalistic, reflecting the overall approach of the game. You can only click on 'continue' or 'play a new game', and everything is reduced to the minimum: white backgrounds, black objects, and so on.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players note that while the game offers initial goals and challenges, once these are completed, it lacks traditional replay value, leaving little incentive to revisit the experience.
- “The game offers a variety of paths and choices, making each playthrough feel fresh and engaging.”
- “With multiple endings and diverse character builds, I find myself coming back for more every time.”
- “The dynamic events and random encounters ensure that no two playthroughs are ever the same.”
- “But after goals are met and total completion is reached, players are not rewarded with traditional replay value.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and play again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying the game feel redundant.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story is often praised for its engaging narrative and well-developed characters, drawing players into a rich and immersive world. However, some reviews note that certain plot points can feel predictable or clichéd, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the storytelling is a highlight for many, though it may not resonate with everyone.
- “The story is incredibly immersive, drawing you in with its rich characters and intricate plot twists.”
- “I was captivated by the emotional depth of the narrative; it truly felt like I was part of the characters' journeys.”
- “The world-building is exceptional, making the story feel alive and full of possibilities.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, with the 30 levels feeling like a frustrating "guess-fest." Many believe that the only motivation to endure this grind is the pursuit of achievements.
- “The achievements should be the only reason to play through this game - however, that tedious guess-fest consists of 30 levels.”
- “Grinding in this game feels more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”
- “The repetitive nature of grinding makes it hard to stay engaged with the game.”