Hearts of Iron IV is a grand strategy wargame that lets players command the world's most powerful war machine during World War II. Experience historical gameplay or create alternate histories as you manage industry, diplomacy, and battle plans to dominate the globe. Connect your Paradox and Steam accounts to access game book content through the mobile app.
The game offers a rich and immersive experience with intricate mechanics and historical detail, rewarding players who invest time to master its systems.
Hearts of Iron IV is praised for its exceptional replayability, with diverse national focus trees and a vibrant modding community that enhances gameplay.
The humor and quirky mechanics, along with a compelling soundtrack, create an engaging atmosphere that keeps players entertained.
The steep learning curve and complexity can be overwhelming for newcomers, often requiring extensive tutorials or community support.
The game's heavy reliance on DLCs for essential content has led to criticism regarding accessibility and perceived value, making it feel like a cash grab.
Numerous players report significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues, particularly in late-game scenarios, detracting from the overall experience.
gameplay
6,468 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
70%
5%
The gameplay of *Hearts of Iron IV* is characterized by its intricate mechanics and steep learning curve, making it both challenging and rewarding for players. While many find the depth of strategy and historical detail engaging, newcomers often struggle with the complexity of the systems, which can be overwhelming without extensive tutorials or community support. Additionally, a significant portion of the game's mechanics and content is locked behind expensive DLCs, which has led to criticism regarding accessibility and value for new players. Overall, the game offers a rich and immersive experience for those willing to invest the time to master its many layers.
“I always keep coming back to this one because of the sheer amount of content and mechanics that all mesh together beautifully.”
“Overall, I’d say this game strikes the perfect balance between complexity and gameplay, making it accessible to players like me who can gradually master it while still having fun—something rare in the grand strategy genre.”
“The gameplay mechanics are smooth and fun, offering a perfect mix of action, exploration, and strategy.”
“80% of my gameplay is just getting the easiest mode ever, choosing a country, waiting, getting an alliance with Germany, beginning a world war, getting stuck in a stalemate in Africa. By 1943, the game just becomes clicking next positions in the research tree, and thinking speed 5 is slow.”
“The sheer amount of menus, mechanics, and micromanagement looked like a nightmare.”
“The game is hugely bloated with largely pointless mechanics that serve little purpose other than overcomplicating things.”
graphics
1,412 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
66%
2%
The graphics of *Hearts of Iron IV* have received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the game's clean and functional design that prioritizes clarity over flashiness. While some praise the stunning visuals and detailed maps that enhance immersion, others criticize the graphics as outdated or lacking in depth, particularly in late-game scenarios where performance issues arise. Overall, the graphics are generally considered good for a grand strategy game, but they may not meet the expectations of players seeking cutting-edge visuals.
“The stunning visuals and immersive world design draw you in, while the engaging storyline keeps you hooked.”
“The graphics are beautiful, and it runs relatively smooth on my computer.”
“Even though I tried many remedies such as setting a high priority task manager setting, lowering graphic settings, and disabling real-time antivirus checks, it didn't help with the matter that the game becomes unplayable after mid to late 1943.”
“The graphics are so realistic, you'll swear you're actually in the middle of a real battle.”
“The graphics in Hearts of Iron IV are fairly basic, with a simple 2D map and unit sprites.”
replayability
1,384 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
50%
3%
Hearts of Iron IV is widely praised for its exceptional replayability, with many players noting that the game offers near-infinite variations in gameplay due to its extensive modding community and diverse national focus trees. Users report that even without mods, the game provides hundreds of hours of unique experiences, and the ability to play as numerous countries with different strategies enhances its longevity. While some critiques mention limited replayability in the base game, the overwhelming consensus is that the modding scene significantly enriches the game's replay value, making it a must-play for strategy enthusiasts.
“It offers literally hundreds of hours of replayability before even considering the fantastic mods, like Kaiserreich and others.”
“The dynamic nature of the game world ensures that no two playthroughs are the same, providing endless replayability.”
“With its depth of gameplay, accessibility, attention to detail, and endless replayability, it's a game that will keep you coming back for more time and time again.”
“The replayability really dies after a while, not as engaging as other strategy games.”
“The base game has very few technologies and poor playability, leading to limited replayability.”
“The national focus trees are far more interesting than they used to be, but this increases replayability only with all the DLC.”
story
1,140 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
80%
9%
The game's story aspect is largely shaped by player choices and the various mods available, allowing for a wide range of unique narratives and alternate historical scenarios. While the base game offers limited storytelling depth, expansions and community-created mods like Kaiserreich significantly enhance the narrative experience, providing rich lore and diverse storylines. Overall, players can create their own stories through gameplay, but those seeking a structured narrative may find the base game lacking.
“The stunning visuals and immersive world design draw you in, while the engaging storyline keeps you hooked.”
“Each path of each country draws upon key historical events which tell a story that, while unlikely, is nothing less than improbable.”
“The game consists mainly of waiting for mission trees to be done, but it allows you to forge a story and explore alternative historical paths.”
“This reliance on DLC limits the storytelling experience in the base game, resulting in a score of 6/10 for narrative.”
“The base game is boring and I would not recommend it if you want a story-driven playthrough.”
“There is actually some story aspects in this game, based upon the focus tree.”
humor
994 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
The humor in this game is a standout feature, with players frequently highlighting its absurdity and dark comedic elements, particularly in the context of alternate history scenarios. Many reviews mention the enjoyment derived from the game's quirky mechanics, unexpected AI behavior, and the ability to create ludicrous historical outcomes, often leading to laughter during gameplay. The modding community further enhances this humor, offering a variety of funny and bizarre modifications that keep the experience fresh and entertaining.
“I was laughing and smiling so hard when I was playing and just spammed nukes on everything, and every time I did it I yelled 'boom boom!' I felt invincible and awesome.”
“The game is quirky and has a sense of humor while explaining history, guiding the player through probably the darkest times in recent memory.”
“The absurdity of a country like Tannu Tuva, now a provincial republic of the Russian Federation, having the possibility to conquer the world is hilarious.”
“As you're nearly guaranteed to fall into an unavoidable existential crisis (lasting approximately 2-3 hours according to my research) because of the unfunny amount of mechanics the developers installed, all of which are awaiting for your ability to multi-task to randomly cease to exist!”
“Also did things that were not funny, kept my face straight.”
“It's actually not funny, don't know why I laughed.”
music
641 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
56%
4%
The music in the game has received a mixed but generally positive reception, with many players praising its ability to enhance the immersive experience of the gameplay. The soundtrack features a blend of orchestral compositions and historical tunes that effectively capture the atmosphere of World War II, although some users noted that it can become repetitive over time. Additionally, the inclusion of music packs, particularly those featuring the band Sabaton, has been highlighted as a significant enhancement, though some players feel that much of the best music is locked behind DLC paywalls.
“The music is also really good; in my opinion, it suits the game perfectly.”
“The sound and music shine, with an epic soundtrack that captures the tension and grandeur of global conflict.”
“The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, setting the mood and enhancing the overall experience.”
“The soundtrack of this game is not that special, like, at all.”
“The music is a bit violent too; same problem with City Skylines, it gets scary asf.”
“The only thing about this game that I hate is the music: very stressful and makes me tired...”
optimization
558 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
61%
26%
The optimization of the game has received significant criticism, particularly regarding its performance in the late game, where many players experience severe lag and slowdowns, especially after 1942. Despite some improvements noted in recent updates, the game remains poorly optimized for lower-end systems and struggles with multiplayer performance, leading to desynchronization issues. Overall, while the game offers engaging content, its optimization issues detract from the overall experience, making it challenging for players to enjoy longer sessions without performance degradation.
“The game runs smoothly on mediocre hardware, even laptops with integrated graphics (provided you turn the visuals down a bit).”
“Additionally, the remarkable CPU optimization has completely eliminated any lag or stuttering, allowing players to fully immerse themselves in the game without any technical hindrances.”
“Overall, the performance is solid and doesn’t detract from the gameplay.”
“The game is really poorly optimized and unless you have a good PC with a fast CPU you will get a lot of stutters, freezes, and lagging around 1943 and onwards.”
“The optimization of this game needs help too because as soon as late war starts to come around the game slows to a snail's crawl at max speed.”
“The only major issues are optimization and multiplayer games.”
grinding
535 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
39%
60%
The grinding aspect of the game is overwhelmingly described as tedious and time-consuming, with many players suggesting that it requires an excessive commitment of hours, often likening it to needing a "second life" to fully engage. While some find enjoyment in the depth and complexity of the gameplay, the repetitive nature of tasks, micromanagement, and the slow pace of progress lead to frustration and a sense of monotony for many. Overall, the consensus is that while the game can be rewarding, it often feels like a grind that detracts from the overall enjoyment.
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“A bit grindy sometimes.”
“Never been a fan of this RTS style game, but for whatever reason, I am hooked on this game and it's all I want to play when I'm not grinding one of my other main games.”
“The AI endlessly produces bloated divisions, creating a tedious, sluggish experience that makes abandoning the game more appealing than slogging through its repetitive wars.”
“The combat system has been ruined by the new update; it requires a large amount of micromanaging in order for your frontlines to work effectively and coherently, which becomes very tedious, boring, and quite frustrating.”
“Despite the huge number of nations, they all play pretty similarly and games can turn into huge grinding slogs where no progress is made for hours, and air power is usually an ancillary element at best.”
stability
500 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
1%
94%
The stability of the game is widely criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players express frustration over the game's performance, particularly in late-game scenarios, where issues like freezing and unresponsive AI are common. While some acknowledge that the game can be enjoyable despite these problems, the overall consensus is that it remains a buggy experience, often requiring mods or workarounds to enhance playability.
“Game runs great on my M2 MacBook Air even without a fan.”
“I play this all the time with my friends and have had no glitches.”
“The game looks fantastic, it's an epic in every sense, and as far as I can tell, it's fairly bug-free.”
“This game is unacceptably buggy and major mechanics do not work properly.”
“The game crashes every time I boot it up and I gave up on troubleshooting, so I accidentally left the launcher idling for 60 hours.”
“For a game that is this buggy, unbalanced, and dependent on mods to be playable, the price is absurd.”
monetization
135 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
23%
71%
The monetization strategy for "Hearts of Iron IV" has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a blatant cash grab due to the extensive reliance on DLCs that lock essential features behind paywalls. While some appreciate the depth and content added through these expansions, the overall sentiment is that the base game lacks value without purchasing multiple DLCs, leading to frustration over the perceived predatory practices of the developers. Additionally, the introduction of an advertising-laden launcher has further soured the experience for many players.
“I understand the monetization system, and I myself have no problem paying money to a company that has been developing this game for years and adding countless new features to it every year as a result.”
“Very easy to play and you aren't forced to make microtransactions to get decent gameplay.”
“One positive thing: no microtransactions or pay-to-progress in this game.”
“The only sour note is Paradox’s DLC policy, which feels like a relentless cash grab.”
“What could have been a masterpiece in the grand strategy genre has turned into a cash grab filled with bad design choices, glaring imbalances, and sheer laziness from the developers.”
“The terrible monetization puts the rotten cherry on top of the foul pie, where you need a significant number of DLCs (some costing more than the base game) to get what seems like now most of the good content.”
emotional
127 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
2%
The emotional aspect of the game is a mixed bag, with many players expressing feelings of frustration, sadness, and even joy throughout their experiences. While some describe it as a deeply engaging and emotionally rewarding journey that can lead to tears, others highlight the stress and emotional damage it can inflict, often humorously lamenting their lack of social interactions and outdoor activities. Overall, the game evokes a wide range of emotions, from heartwarming moments to intense frustration, making it a unique yet polarizing experience for players.
“It's one of those games that when something goes right you feel amazing and when something goes wrong you want to cry.”
“The plot is rich, unpredictable, and touching.”
“Playing Hearts of Iron IV with my son was an emotional experience that brought us closer together.”
“The storyline felt incredibly boring and failed to evoke any emotional response.”
“I found the emotional depth lacking; it just didn't resonate with me.”
“The characters were one-dimensional, making it hard to connect on an emotional level.”
atmosphere
80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
46%
4%
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and historically accurate representation of the World War II era, enhanced by dynamic weather, day-night cycles, and a compelling soundtrack that captures the tension and drama of the time. Players appreciate the intricate systems and detailed visuals that create a captivating environment, making it easy to lose track of time while engaging with the game's complex geopolitical scenarios. Overall, the combination of sound design, graphics, and gameplay mechanics contributes to a rich and replayable atmosphere that keeps players engaged.
“Historical accuracy and intricate systems drop the player into an atmosphere reminiscent of the powder keg that was the inter-war period leading up to World War II.”
“The visual design, combined with a stirring musical score, creates an immersive atmosphere that draws you into the chaos of global conflict.”
“The game's atmosphere is immersive, with detailed historical events and decisions that give a sense of the era’s gravity and complexity.”
“But there is a huge void in terms of atmosphere, character interactions and storyline.”
“It does not have the atmosphere of a World War II game.”
“I really like some parts, especially the atmosphere it creates, but unfortunately the many weak spots totally spoil this.”
character development
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
Character development is a highlight of the game, with well-written main characters and impressive voice acting that enhance the narrative. However, some players feel that the main character could benefit from more heroic traits and deeper development to elevate the overall storyline.
“Nice game, love the story and character development of the main characters, and the betrayal at the end is crazy.”
“The story is filled with well-written characters and great character designs along with amazing voice acting.”
“The storyline would be better if the main character was more heroic and had more character development.”