Skip to main content
Aces of Thunder Game Cover

About Aces of Thunder

Aces of Thunder is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with a historical theme. It was developed by Gaijin Entertainment and was released on February 3, 2026. It received neutral reviews from players.

Aces of Thunder Editions Get more from Aces of Thunder experience with the Deluxe Upgrade! This bundle includes: - F4U-4; - Spitfire Mk Ia; - Hurricane Mk IV; - SBD-3; - P-40E-1. Note: additional planes don't allow for more respawns in a multiplayer battle, but provide wider selection of aircraft. About the GameExperience the thrill of aerial combat with Aces of Thunder, the ult…

Skip Games Like Aces of Thunder

Games Like Aces of Thunder

Looking for games like Aces of Thunder? Here are top shooter recommendations with a historical focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Blitz, IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad or Nuclear Option.

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

55%Audience ScoreBased on 751 reviews
story35 positive mentions
stability20 negative mentions

  • Immersive VR experience with detailed and realistic cockpits, particularly enjoyable for WWI and WWII aircraft enthusiasts.
  • Good flight physics that strike a balance between arcade and sim, providing a challenging yet accessible dogfighting gameplay.
  • Smooth performance on mid to high-end PCs and well-optimized for VR with HOTAS support once controls are set up.
  • Clunky and unintuitive VR and flat-screen menus that require VR controllers to navigate, causing frustration especially during HOTAS setup.
  • Lack of key cockpit interactions beyond throttle, stick, and landing gear, reducing immersion compared to other VR flight sims.
  • Sparse online multiplayer player base with issues in matchmaking, no voice chat, and frequent bot-filled lobbies limiting multiplayer enjoyment.
  • story

    223 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    16% positive mentions, 79% neutral mentions, 5% negative mentions

    The story and mission aspect of the game is widely viewed as underdeveloped, featuring mostly short, simplistic, and disconnected missions with little narrative cohesion or campaign depth. Many users express a desire for longer, more immersive missions including takeoff and landing sequences, co-op play, and richer historical context, while criticizing abrupt mission endings, repetitive mission design, and bugs that hinder immersion. Although mission editor and VR flight mechanics receive some praise, the overall single-player experience is often compared unfavorably to competitors due to limited content and lack of meaningful progression or story integration.

    • “The single-player mission editor is a big highlight, allowing you to create your own content.”
    • “As a casual flight sim enjoyer using quest joysticks and motion controls, I found the single player 'war stories' campaign and missions to be a lot of fun.”
    • “Playing online to keep it mixed up but absolutely loving the missions; I wish there was more!”
    • “No campaign or story, very short and scripted missions, limited content. Such a dropped ball here, you could have had massive campaigns with stories from WWII, Pearl Harbor, Britain, bombing Berlin, etc. This is where the game was supposed to shine, but it does not.”
    • “Missions are simplistic, go there, bomb this, shoot those planes, etc. The game has a campaign, solo missions and a mission editor, so hours of content, but they are just random and disconnected missions with little narrative.”
    • “The campaign they mentioned in teasers is just a splattering of single missions that for the most part have nothing to do with one another. First you're in a Spitfire defending a radar, the next mission you're at Pearl Harbor. You can hardly call this a campaign, they're just random missions.”
  • graphics

    139 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    43% positive mentions, 51% neutral mentions, 6% negative mentions

    The graphics receive mixed feedback, with many praising the detailed cockpits, smooth VR visuals, and solid performance on higher-end hardware, while others criticize dated or mediocre terrain textures, visual sharpness, and lack of advanced graphical options. Optimization varies, leading to stuttering on some systems despite decent graphics settings. Overall, visuals are good for VR combat flight sims but fall short compared to top-tier contemporary simulators.

    • “The graphics are gorgeous, and the gameplay is buttery smooth.”
    • “Being able to simply look around in a combat flight sim is amazing, the graphics and VFX are outstanding and attention to detail is true sim level.”
    • “Definitely having a blast though and worth the money to cruise through dogfights with some of the best VR graphics I've seen.”
    • “The graphics aren't great and somehow it looks the exact same in my 4k micro OLED headset that it does using my Quest 3.”
    • “Bad menu navigation, no inbuilt HOTAS support, multiplayer session errors, and decade old graphics is not acceptable for a 2026 game which was in development for years.”
    • “The graphics are surprisingly poor, it has a forced sharpening filter which makes the game visually very ugly, it looks much worse in-game than in trailers.”
  • optimization

    58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    36% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 14% negative mentions

    Optimization reviews for the game are mixed, with many praising solid graphics and smooth performance on mid-to-high-end PCs, especially in VR. However, several users report persistent stuttering, frame drops, and poor VR optimization even on powerful hardware, causing motion sickness and gameplay issues. Overall, while the game runs well for some, it appears in need of further optimization and polish to fully deliver a stable VR experience across all setups.

    • “The game is very polished, runs great, looks great and has unparalleled immersion relative to any other VR-first flight sim I've played (without the performance cost of sims that aren't made for VR).”
    • “Performance on 5080 RTX w Ryzen 5800X3D is fantastic and better than any other sim (using Q3+Steamlink/VD wireless).”
    • “Performance is excellent, I'm on a 4070Ti, put graphics to max and it's pulling 90fps with no issues at all.”
    • “Horrible VR performance even on my 9800x3d/5090 PC beast, flight dynamics awful as ever, wonky motion control menu interaction.”
    • “On the surface it is just everything I could want from a War Thunder VR experience, but in reality it is poorly optimized both graphically and control scheme wise.”
    • “I don't know if I am the only person that has this issue or not, but even on the lowest graphic settings and with my 3070ti, the game is constantly stuttering and it gives me terrible motion sickness and forces me to pretty much guess where my shots are going to go.”
  • gameplay

    54 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    26% positive mentions, 68% neutral mentions, 6% negative mentions

    The gameplay offers a fun and challenging VR flight experience with solid core mechanics and good use of HOTAS setups, appealing primarily to flight sim enthusiasts. However, it feels somewhat shallow and limited compared to competitors like War Thunder, lacking depth, polished controls, and essential quality-of-life features such as tutorials, control remapping, and smoother carrier operations. While the VR integration and cinematic battle moments are praised, many find the gameplay overall underwhelming and in need of further development to reach its full potential.

    • “The gameplay is very challenging but also fun and rewarding.”
    • “Takes some practice but the gameplay gets very cinematic in the heat of battle.”
    • “The menu system is not great and definitely needs improvement, but it is usable and does not block gameplay.”
    • “My hope for a simple fast multiplayer game to just hop in and hop out of just isn't there; you can get more or less the same gameplay by playing quick missions in il2.”
    • “It seems like it is missing a ton of quality of life and just basic settings for VR gameplay.”
    • “This game was advertised as high fidelity (meaning in-depth interactable cockpits) but came out with way under bare minimum gameplay mechanics.”
  • stability

    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    26% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 74% negative mentions

    The game is widely reported to be buggy and unstable, with frequent crashes, freezes, and issues particularly affecting controls and the user interface. While some users experience smooth performance on high-end setups, many struggle with glitches that disrupt immersion and hinder usability, suggesting the game needs significant optimization and bug fixing.

    • “The game is very polished, runs great, looks great and has unparalleled immersion relative to any other VR-first flight sim I've played (without the performance cost of sims that aren't made for VR).”
    • “It runs great on my MSI laptop with an Oculus Pro, using Virtual Desktop.”
    • “Runs great (max setting, 90 fps) on a 5070 Ti with a lot of headroom.”
    • “Absolute bug-ridden, unplayable mess; control setup is littered with bugs, constantly crashes when trying to start, and on the odd miracle it does start, machine guns fire randomly without input.”
    • “The VR is buggy to say the least. Even if you boot in VR, the game thinks you want to use your mouse. The VR controls are even worse, and your plane will randomly do things you don't want it to do. I would wait until they iron out these issues. If you don't have a flight stick, just don't buy it.”
    • “The game struggles to run smoothly even on the lowest settings. I experienced freezes and crashes in the main lobby. This is not a worthwhile investment at the current time. The devs need to optimize it better. I couldn't even test controls issues because I couldn't get into a match without crashing. My PC runs other VR games smoothly, so it's not my hardware.”
  • monetization

    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    8% positive mentions, 17% neutral mentions, 75% negative mentions

    Users have mixed views on monetization, with many criticizing the game as an overpriced cash grab lacking substantive content and feeling incomplete, especially compared to free alternatives like War Thunder VR. However, some acknowledge the game is well-priced without grinding or microtransactions, though concerns remain about its overall value and marketing approach.

    • “This game is extremely realistic and well priced for a gaijin game (no grinding or microtransactions).”
    • “Cheap cash grab, flipped assets, bare bones game modes.”
    • “Its a red flag and outright cash grab for a game that was mostly advertised as VR title when VR feels like an afterthought.”
    • “Oh and just to add a wee bit more, I think the monetization on this is going to be absolute hell.”
  • grinding

    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    50% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions

    Users appreciate that the game eliminates grinding, offering no tier systems, component upgrades, or microtransactions, which contrasts with similar titles like War Thunder. While this enhances realism and accessibility, some find the manual control mapping tedious. Overall, the absence of grinding is seen as a positive feature that appeals to simulation enthusiasts.

    • “I would be the very first to sign up if this became the replacement for War Thunder's mostly abandoned simulator battles mode: an improved, separate sim game with no grinding to get all of the sim player grognards what they want: huge maps, in-flight missions, VR support, no farmers.”
    • “This game is extremely realistic and well priced for a Gaijin game (no grinding or microtransactions).”
    • “No grinding for any planes, no tiers, and no component upgrade paths (those completely turned me off of War Thunder).”
    • “Yes, it can be bound, but it is tedious and feels more like a workaround than a programmed feature.”
    • “No dropdown menus to select your controller from; you are required to map your own custom controls, a tedious task to say the least. This is echoed by many in negative reviews.”
    • “Very easy but just tedious.”
  • music

    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    29% positive mentions, 28% neutral mentions, 43% negative mentions

    The music in the game is largely recycled from War Thunder, which disappoints players expecting original tracks, and many missions lack any music entirely, featuring only sound effects like engine noise and gunfire. While the trailers showcase great music, the in-game silence and minimal soundtrack detract from the overall experience.

    • “The trailers have such great music, but every mission is dead silent except for engine noises and gunfire.”
    • “Hell, the main menu in the hangar has one of Gaijin Entertainment's music, not even joking.”
    • “It looks and sounds good, but the problem is it's basically using the same exact assets as War Thunder (same music, assets, and sound effects).”
    • “Even the music is from War Thunder.”
    • “No music either.”
  • replayability

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    67% positive mentions, 33% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game offers strong replayability through short, enjoyable missions that require multiple attempts to master, complemented by a variety of scenarios. Players find it engaging and fun, though some hope for future updates to enhance overall playability.

    • “The missions are short but fun, with good replay value as it takes a lot of tries to do well.”
    • “All in all, this is a brilliant combat flight game in my opinion, great immersion, good graphics, plenty of scenarios and replayability and best of all, really good fun.”
  • humor

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The humor aspect is not highlighted as a strength, with users focusing more on frustrations like poor control binding and lack of communication features. However, some suggest that adding team radio comms could introduce fun and humorous interactions for players who enjoy social play.

  • atmosphere

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The atmosphere is praised for its immersive and intense dogfighting experience, particularly capturing the chaotic spirit of WWI aerial combat with numerous planes engaged simultaneously. Additionally, it offers a satisfactory representation of WWII air battles, contributing to an overall engaging wartime aviation ambiance.

    • “The dogfighting atmosphere is amazing, especially the WW1 aircraft. Just a giant furball of planes, it's amazing.”
    • “Atmosphere feels like a decent WW2 experience (good enough).”
  • emotional

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    Users express significant frustration and disappointment with the game's emotional impact, citing unfun gameplay and poor controls that lead to frequent failure and frustration rather than enjoyment. Despite some appreciation for the visuals, the overall emotional experience is negative, leaving players feeling upset rather than engaged.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Aces of Thunder

Play Times

5h Median play time
11h Average play time
3-8h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 6 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Game News
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Aces of Thunder is a shooter game with historical theme. Common tags for Aces of Thunder include first-person, 3D, realistic, world war i, world war ii and others.

Aces of Thunder is available on PC, Virtual Reality and Windows.

On average players spend around 11 hours playing Aces of Thunder.

Aces of Thunder was released on February 3, 2026.

Aces of Thunder was developed by Gaijin Entertainment.

Aces of Thunder has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked Aces of Thunder for its story but disliked it for its stability.

Aces of Thunder is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Blitz, IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad, Nuclear Option, Comanche, VTOL VR and others.