WW2: Bunker Simulator

About

"WW2: Bunker Simulator" is a game where you play as a soldier in the 101st Airborne Division, defending a captured German bunker during the Battle of Normandy. Your mission includes performing various tasks such as preparing food, scavenging for supplies, and fending off enemy attacks. The game involves opening packs of cards to obtain guns and fighting off zombies, adding a unique twist to the historical battle simulation.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 138 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

grinding5 negative mentions

The game has a unique and engaging concept, allowing players to experience life in a WWII bunker with various survival mechanics.
Atmospheric elements, such as the cooking mechanic and the use of Morse code, add depth and realism to the gameplay.
Despite its flaws, many players find the game fun and addictive, with potential for improvement and expansion in future updates.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs and clunky mechanics, making basic tasks frustrating and often unmanageable.
Many players feel the game is not ready for full release, citing issues with AI behavior, combat mechanics, and a lack of meaningful content.
The gameplay loop can become repetitive quickly, with daily tasks feeling tedious and lacking variety, leading to a diminished sense of progression.

story
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
82%
9%
The game's story is criticized for its lack of depth and coherence, with many players finding the plot and writing to be underwhelming. While the missions provide some structure, they often feel repetitive and plagued by bugs, leading to frustration when objectives are not met or when unexpected challenges arise. Overall, players express a desire for more engaging content and improvements to the mission system to enhance the narrative experience.
- “I love this game; it is nice to see a developer create a WWII bunker defense/survival game that has missions but is also sandbox.”
- “Also, the randomization of daily missions makes the replayability possible.”
- “I love the strength system as you work out or carry heavy rocks; the Morse code for getting missions and submitting your reports is cool, and the cooking system being so in-depth is pretty great.”
- “The game's plot or its story/writing is pretty dumb.”
- “It seems like a really cool game but damn I hate it already, many many many bugs, random Germans spawning inside the bunker while on the radio in the morning, then on the patrol mission invisible enemies shooting at you, and items glitching through the ground. Wish I could have said better things about it but sadly no... could have been something great.”
- “Fix the problem about the battles not ending even after beating all the enemies, which makes you unable to complete the mission nor sleep.”
gameplay
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
52%
16%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players highlighting a variety of engaging mechanics like cooking and survival tasks, but also expressing frustration over bugs, clunky controls, and a lack of effective tutorials. While some find the gameplay fun and unique, others criticize it for being repetitive and frustrating, particularly due to issues with saving progress and the overall flow of mechanics. Overall, the game offers interesting elements but suffers from significant technical shortcomings that detract from the experience.
- “The cooking mechanic is well fleshed out.”
- “There are a lot of fun little mechanics such as cooking, chopping firewood, and maintaining your bunker defenses.”
- “A unique game with fun, engaging gameplay.”
- “So many bugs and poor gameplay flow.”
- “Full of bugs, mechanics clunky, doesn't teach you how to use them properly.”
- “The mechanics and gameplay designs are so bad and so frustrating that those alone might make me get a refund.”
graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
Overall, opinions on the graphics are mixed; while some users find them acceptable and fitting for the game's style, others criticize them as outdated with poor textures and animations. There is a consensus that an upgrade would enhance the experience, but the visuals are still considered functional and contribute positively to the game's enjoyment.
- “The visuals are quite nice, simple but designed in a way that works.”
- “I really like it, but the graphics could use an upgrade; really great game overall.”
- “Graphics are okay; sounds, animations, etc. There's a combination of survival and combat elements that fits well with the fun factor.”
- “Graphics are poor, with bad animations.”
- “Even free games have better graphics and textures; this is just not right.”
- “I read a lot about how people hate the graphics, and I can see why; they really need improvement.”
atmosphere
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The game is praised for its immersive World War II atmosphere, featuring realistic vehicles and weapons that enhance the experience. While some users note its limitations, the bunker management aspect adds to the overall ambiance, making it a worthwhile purchase for those seeking a genuine historical vibe, especially at a discount.
- “Atmospheric, I really enjoy the bunker management aspects of the game.”
- “Generally a realistic WWII atmosphere with period vehicles and weapons.”
- “Where I think this game shines is the atmosphere; you are not a Spartan who can solo 1000 tanks or armies with one hand.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and lacking in meaningful progression, as it often involves repetitive tasks without significant upgrades or new items. While some acknowledge occasional grindiness, the overall sentiment is that the gameplay feels monotonous and fails to deliver a serious survival experience.
- “It's not even grinding because there is no point in it, no upgrades, no new items, just the same routine day after day after day.”
- “In short, the base game is fun but tedious with management of allies, lack of usable ammo, especially when called in, so you will most likely be using German weapons more often as it is more affordable ammo-wise.”
- “It tries to be a survival WW2 simulator, but overall felt tedious, silly, and not 'serious.'”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The game's music features a standout menu track that players describe as beautiful, though the overall soundtrack is limited to just one song. Additionally, there are some technical issues, such as music continuing to play after certain events have concluded.
- “May I say... that is some of the most beautiful menu music I have ever heard in recent times personally in a game.”
- “The music is just one song.”
- “Oh and there was another bug where after a plane event the music just kept blaring even though the day was done.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a blend of humor and intensity, with players enjoying the comedic moments when enemies are humorously launched into the air by explosions. This lightheartedness enhances the experience, making it ideal for late-night gaming sessions with friends, where both goofy antics and serious gameplay coexist.
- “There's some humor in this game when enemies get blown up; they go flying!”
- “It would add for many things like late-night gaming with friends, doing goofy things, and laughing at the poor German soldier being sent into orbit by an RPG, or getting serious in the heat of battle as a wave of Germans comes over the hill and pushes into your bunker.”
- “It's in-depth but also has a humorous side.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The stability of the game is criticized for being unoptimized and plagued with bugs, including issues with save games and persistent glitches, particularly at the end of missions. Players express frustration over these problems, indicating that significant improvements are needed for a smoother experience.
- “Seemed okay-ish, albeit horribly unoptimized and buggy. Save games aren't working, though, so it's a no from me.”
- “Other than that, just general bug fixes and glitches would be nice. Oh yeah, and the glitches at the end of missions when there are no more enemies but it says there are and won't let you sleep is pretty annoying.”
- “The game is still super buggy (I know it's early access, but still).”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
100%
The game requires significant optimization, particularly regarding the complex mechanics for burying mines, and is plagued by bugs that affect save functionality. Overall, while there are some positive elements, the lack of polish and optimization detracts from the experience.
- “The game has great potential, but it needs some significant optimization, particularly regarding the complexity of burying mines.”
- “Overall, the optimization is on the right track, but there are areas that could use improvement for a smoother experience.”
- “While the gameplay is enjoyable, optimizing certain mechanics would enhance the overall flow and accessibility.”
- “It needs some massive optimization, especially with the overcomplication of how to bury mines, but it's pretty good.”
- “Seemed okay-ish, albeit horribly unoptimized and buggy. Save games aren't working, though, so it's a no from me.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Reviewers highlight that the randomization of daily missions significantly enhances the game's replayability, providing players with fresh challenges and experiences each time they play.
- “The randomization of daily missions enhances the replayability significantly.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the diverse challenges and missions available.”
- “The variety of choices and outcomes keeps me coming back for more.”
- “The randomization of daily missions makes replayability possible.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices in gameplay severely limits replayability.”