Skip to main content

World War III: Black Gold

World War III: Black Gold Game Cover
72%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
story, music
72% User Score Based on 366 reviews

Platforms

PCMac OSWindows
World War III: Black Gold Game Cover

About

World War III: Black Gold is a single player and multiplayer real-time strategy game with warfare and science fiction themes. It was developed by Reality Pump and was released on September 27, 2013. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

World War III: Black Gold takes the player to the near future. The political crisis has been going on for months, leading to worldwide turmoil. A secret conference of the UN Central Geological Commission reveals that worldwide oil reserves have reached dangerously low levels: Oil reserves will run out within 8-10 years. This proves too short for even the most highly industrialized countries to swi…

Skip User Reviews

72%
Audience ScoreBased on 366 reviews
gameplay8 positive mentions
monetization2 negative mentions

  • Unique setting centered on a near-future oil crisis with multiple factions providing distinct tactical styles.
  • Emphasis on realistic military logistics, including ammunition management and supply lines, adds tactical depth.
  • Large-scale 3D battlefields with terrain deformation and day/night/weather effects enrich gameplay immersion.
  • Dated graphics and sound design with blocky models, low FPS lock, and occasional performance issues on modern systems.
  • Poor unit pathfinding and sometimes clunky or unresponsive controls hamper gameplay experience.
  • Campaign missions can be repetitive, objectives vague, and overall strategic depth limited compared to classic RTS titles.
  • gameplay
    42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay blends traditional real-time strategy elements with realistic logistics and battlefield mechanics, offering unique features like terrain deformation and supply lines that distinguish it within its era. However, it suffers from clunky controls, outdated design, simplistic mechanics, and unbalanced gameplay, making it feel tedious or boring to some players today. Despite these flaws, it retains nostalgic value and can still be enjoyable for fans seeking a mix of familiar RTS gameplay with some fresh twists.

    • “Released during the early 2000s, the game attempts to blend traditional RTS mechanics with a slightly more realistic approach to logistics and modern warfare.”
    • “Its focus on resource conflict, logistical supply systems, and realistic battlefield mechanics gives it a distinctive identity among strategy games of its time.”
    • “The gameplay with the supply lines for ammo and the terrain deformation makes this a hidden gem of the RTS genre.”
    • “Honestly, this game fails on almost every front: performance, gameplay, design, presentation.”
    • “➖ Poorly designed, boring gameplay.”
    • “I can withstand old graphics, outdated gameplay, even low fps and "software"-powered cursor, but man, those controls are clunky, to say the least!!!”
  • graphics
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of this early 2000s RTS game are widely regarded as outdated and blocky, reflecting the technological limits of its time, with some finding them weak even by 2001 standards. However, many reviewers acknowledge that the visuals still effectively convey the atmosphere and action, appealing especially to fans of classic strategy games despite their dated appearance. Overall, the graphics are considered adequate for nostalgia or retro enjoyment but would benefit from modernization for contemporary audiences.

    • “While the graphics naturally reflect the technological limitations of early 2000s PC hardware, the game still manages to create a convincing atmosphere of large-scale military warfare.”
    • “Black Gold's combination of intense real-time action, gorgeous graphics, and streamlined play make this one of the best real-time strategy games of 2001.”
    • “Every part of the game — the visuals, the sound, the pacing — kind of blends into this feeling that you’re actually inside its world, even if you’re just casually playing.”
    • “The game suffers from poor graphics, unbalanced gameplay, and a lack of engaging content, making it feel outdated and boring.”
    • “Even for a 2001 release, the graphics are weak.”
    • “Combat is shallow, base building is shallow, graphics are ugly (for the time even) and the audio is mediocre.”
  • story
    35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story centers on a realistic and timely premise of global oil depletion sparking geopolitical conflict, told through mission arcs for three factions with contextual briefings and voice communications. However, many players find the narrative basic, clichéd, and uninspired, with some missions lacking clear objectives, which hampers engagement. While the thematic foundation is strong, the execution and mission design limit the story's impact and overall appeal.

    • “The story premise revolves around the idea that global oil supplies are projected to be depleted within a decade, triggering economic instability and rising political tension between major powers.”
    • “The single-player campaign is divided into multiple mission arcs corresponding to the three playable factions.”
    • “Between missions, brief story sequences and mission briefings help contextualize the conflict and explain the shifting alliances and strategies taking place across the world.”
    • “Some missions don't provide any real direction or tips on how to do them, not even in the beginning.”
    • “Objectives are baffling and obscure and you just have to guess where the game wants you to go, and if you go in the wrong direction, it can downright make you lose the mission.”
    • “The story is a little disappointing.”
  • music
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's music is a mix of dramatic orchestral and ambient sounds that enhance intense moments, though some find the soundtrack repetitive, loud, and occasionally annoying. While the music fits the game's early 2000s style and evokes nostalgia for some, others wish for better volume control and more variety. Overall, the soundtrack is viewed as decent but inconsistent in quality.

    • “The game features a mixture of dramatic orchestral music and ambient combat sounds that accompany intense engagements.”
    • “Very fun nostalgia trip, awesome soundtrack and cool real world vehicles to command :)”
    • “While the gameplay itself may not be up to 2013 RTS standards, the music, ambience, mission creativity, mechanics, and immersion are top notch for its time.”
    • “The music constantly loops, while not being great at the same time.”
    • “The music is a mixed bag, with some parts decent, and other parts getting really annoying after a while, especially the combat bits.”
    • “The music is also very loud and really hurts my ears with random noises, and there are no settings to adjust the volume or mouse sensitivity.”
  • atmosphere
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is praised for convincingly capturing large-scale military warfare despite early 2000s graphical limitations, with sound design effectively enhancing the immersive battlefield experience. Additionally, its eerie, Cold War-inspired mood adds a psychologically engaging layer for players interested in that era.

    • “While the graphics naturally reflect the technological limitations of early 2000s PC hardware, the game still manages to create a convincing atmosphere of large-scale military warfare.”
    • “Sound design helps reinforce this battlefield atmosphere.”
    • “Eerie atmosphere that messes with your head if you are into Cold War themes.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game features no microtransactions, delivering a cohesive experience without monetization gimmicks. However, some users caution that platforms like Steam may include less transparent advertising, urging buyers to carefully review game details before purchase.

    • “No microtransactions.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is considered tedious and reminiscent of classic RTS titles from the 90s, requiring extra effort such as a second live to progress. While standard and somewhat repetitive, it offers decent value, especially when purchased on sale.

    • “The campaign is grindy, copying the sins of old RTS games from the 90s.”
    • “In terms of gameplay it is rather standard and sometimes tedious, though despite all its shortcomings, I'd say if it's on sale, pick it up if you want another RTS; nothing too special but for less than a dollar you get your money's worth.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, including bugs, lag, and background processes that hinder performance. Despite attempts with patches and compatibility fixes, users find it frustrating and often unplayable.

    • “Buggy, runs in the background without you knowing it, and boring gameplay-wise.”
    • “I tried applying the patch, running in compatibility mode, and downloading nglide as mentioned in the discussion posts, but I am not willing to invest any more time in troubleshooting this game.”
    • “Buggy and laggy, making the game unplayable.”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers strong replayability for strategy enthusiasts through its gameplay beyond the main story campaign, with some additional appeal for players seeking nostalgic experiences.

    • “For strategy enthusiasts, this adds significant replay value beyond the story-driven campaign missions.”
  • optimization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization is generally reported as poor, with performance issues contributing to a negative overall experience alongside problems in gameplay, design, and presentation.

    • “Performance has been mostly fine.”
    • “Honestly, this game fails on almost every front: performance, gameplay, design, presentation.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is lively and engaging, adding a fun and entertaining layer that keeps players laughing, even during strategic moments like planning raids.

Skip Game Offers

Buy World War III: Black Gold

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like World War III: Black Gold
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

World War III: Black Gold is a real-time strategy game with warfare and science fiction themes.

World War III: Black Gold is available on PC, Mac OS and Windows.

World War III: Black Gold was released on September 27, 2013.

World War III: Black Gold was developed by Reality Pump.

World War III: Black Gold has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked World War III: Black Gold for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

World War III: Black Gold is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Supreme Commander, Act of Aggression, Ground Control, Crossfire: Legion, Meridian: New World and others.