Wildlife Park 2

About

Wildlife Park 2 is a zoo simulation game that allows you to build and manage your own dream zoo. Care for over 50 different animal species, observe their interactions, and provide them with all-around care, including feeding, doctoring, and relocating. With over 100 animal houses and visitor facilities, create the ultimate zoo experience while ensuring the welfare of your animals and the satisfaction of your visitors.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

67%

Audience ScoreBased on 309 reviews

graphics20 positive mentions

gameplay5 negative mentions

Wildlife Park 2 offers a nostalgic experience with a lot of creative twists and a diverse range of animals.
The game runs well on older computers, making it accessible for those on a budget.
The mission lore adds an interesting narrative element, enhancing the gameplay experience.

The game suffers from numerous bugs and glitches, including issues with animal animations and AI behavior.
The user interface is clunky and can be confusing, making it difficult to manage the zoo effectively.
The lack of a comprehensive tutorial leaves new players struggling to understand the mechanics of the game.

graphics
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
51%
10%
The graphics of the game are generally considered decent for its age, with many reviewers noting that they have held up well since its release nearly 20 years ago. While some players find the visuals to be dated or buggy, others appreciate the beautiful artwork and improved realism compared to similar titles like Zoo Tycoon 2. Overall, the graphics are seen as a mix of charming and flawed, contributing to the game's nostalgic appeal despite some technical shortcomings.
- “The graphics in this version are also really good for the time it was made and still hold up.”
- “Beautiful graphics for such an old game.”
- “The graphics are great and very pleasing to the eye, and the animal sounds are realistic too.”
- “The graphics, although decent for the time, have aged extremely poorly.”
- “The simulation is lackluster, the AI and graphics are poor, the game gives you barely any helpful advice when it comes to the game and it feels like it has no idea what it wants to be.”
- “Let's get the one gripe I have out of the way: the graphics and animations are a bit yesteryear but not terrible, but an upgrade to more realistic models would have been a 10/10.”
story
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
74%
7%
The game's story revolves around a character from Sweden whose father is a controversial researcher studying extinct animals, providing a unique backdrop for the missions. While many players appreciate the mission lore and tutorial aspects, some find the narrative and mission structure repetitive and lacking depth, with mixed feelings about the overall engagement of the story mode. Overall, the missions serve as a helpful introduction to gameplay mechanics, but the storyline itself is often deemed adequate rather than compelling.
- “One interesting thing that stands out is the mission lore where you are a person with a family from Sweden and your father is a world-class researcher who is controversially studying the viability of bringing back extinct animals, which may or may not end with him being detained for a period of time.”
- “The story mode is great, and the first four scenarios do a great job of teaching you how to play.”
- “Campaign mode is basically a thorough tutorial that will teach you how this game works through each mission.”
- “There's also a story in these scenarios and they make no sense at all.”
- “The storyline for the missions was adequate but not something I would write home about.”
- “The game has a story type mode, but personally, it isn't too fun or interesting, though it's quite long.”
gameplay
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
67%
21%
Gameplay in this game is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the engaging animal care mechanics and the variety of species, while others find the experience repetitive and confusing due to poorly explained mechanics. Although the game offers detailed environmental interactions and allows for creative experimentation, many users criticize its outdated graphics and tedious gameplay, leading to a sense of emptiness in player choices. Overall, while nostalgic for some, the gameplay may not meet the expectations of those seeking a modern zoo management experience.
- “I revisited this game after years and I can safely say that it is a good zoo game. Despite some confusion at the start, you'll learn the mechanics and rules in no time!”
- “Wildlife Park 2 is an absolutely fantastic game with a lot to do. If you think with the mechanics in mind, you can do a lot of different things in-game.”
- “Lets start by saying that you can build the ultimate wildlife park in Wildlife Park 2 thanks to all the mechanics, buildings, and animals.”
- “The gameplay itself is extremely boring and tedious.”
- “Gameplay feels sort of empty, and you get a sense that your choices don't really have much meaning.”
- “This game used to be my go-to zoo tycoon game, but now that I look at it again, it really sucks. The models look like PS1 stuff, the gameplay is a bit repetitive, and sometimes things are super confusing, like how the hell do I fill up my rivers?”
music
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
29%
36%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate its charm and beauty, many criticize it for being repetitive and overly loud, leading to a frustrating experience. Users note that the soundtrack can feel empty when turned off, yet its lack of variety detracts from the overall enjoyment. Additionally, the animal sounds can become overwhelming, contributing to a chaotic audio environment.
- “The music is wonderful, animals and their animations are great, I even enjoy the story (the last one could be due to nostalgia though).”
- “Great soundtrack!”
- “The graphics and models are nice and the music is charming after only 1 minute of gameplay.”
- “The background music is annoying and there are some management aspects that are just not cool (why so much complexity for taking care of trees?).”
- “Game is boring plus the background music is so inappropriately loud with someone shouting.”
- “The soundtrack is really repetitive and the missions (as far as I played) were boring and tedious with the slow narration.”
stability
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of Wildlife Park 2 is a mixed bag, with many users reporting significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues that can hinder gameplay. While some players find the game enjoyable despite these problems, others caution potential buyers about the frequent technical difficulties, suggesting it may be best to wait for updates or sales before purchasing. Overall, the game is seen as fun but marred by instability.
- “If you're itching for a zoo tycoon-style game, beware: Wildlife Park 2 will scratch that itch for a while, but it ultimately fails due to buildups of bugs, glitches, and lags that effectively render the game unplayable.”
- “That said, be aware that if you're going to buy this game, you're in for a buggy experience.”
- “Creating a tank or mountains will cause glitches.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, with many describing the gameplay as boring and overwhelming due to a lack of effective sorting systems and engaging missions. While some suggest that taking breaks can alleviate the monotony, the overall sentiment leans towards frustration with the lengthy and uninspired tasks.
- “The gameplay itself is extremely boring and tedious.”
- “The menus are tedious, and I didn't see any way to sort plants or animals by biomes, needs, etc. The graphics aren't very good, and it kept crashing every time I tried to switch to another tab.”
- “I found the missions quite tedious, sometimes going longer than an hour (cough cough the infamous ostrich farm mission..).”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in this zoo simulator is highlighted as a standout feature, with players appreciating its funny and creative twists, as well as amusing bugs that add to the experience. Many find it both entertaining and educational, often leading to moments of genuine laughter, making it a memorable choice for fans of the genre.
- “I love zoo sims very much, and this one has a lot of funny creative twists.”
- “Even though I have Planet Zoo, this game is hilarious, so I keep it installed.”
- “10/10 would burst out laughing at horse jumps again.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews; while some users report significant issues with the user interface and general performance, others have experienced no major performance problems during gameplay.
- “I had no major performance issues playing the game.”
- “The UI is terribly optimized.”
- “The game is badly optimized, but that's nothing new.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere of the game is noted for its surprising depth, particularly appealing to those with a fondness for mid-2000s graphics, while also providing a moderately challenging experience.
- “It still holds up as it's moderately challenging, and if you have a soft spot for mid-2000s graphics, it's surprisingly atmospheric.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users express that the emotional impact of the game can be overwhelming, leading to strong reactions that may include frustration or the inability to articulate feelings clearly. This suggests that the game effectively resonates on a deep emotional level, prompting genuine responses from players.
- “I got so emotional during the game; it really pulled at my heartstrings.”
- “The story made me feel a deep connection to the characters, and I found myself tearing up.”
- “This game evokes such strong emotions; I felt joy, sadness, and everything in between.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players highlight that the game offers significant replayability, particularly for those who can leverage their creativity and imagination to explore different possibilities.
- “There's a ton of replayability if you have the imagination for it.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and play it again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices makes replaying the game feel redundant.”