Skip to main content

Who's at the door?

Who's at the door? Game Cover
89%Game Brain Score
Most mentioned positive aspects:story, gameplay
Most mentioned negative aspects:grinding
89% User Score Based on 576 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchPCPlaystation 5Playstation 4WindowsPlayStation
Who's at the door? Game Cover

About Who's at the door?

Who's at the door? is a single player survival simulation game with horror, mystery and thriller themes. It was developed by SKONEC Entertainment and was released on July 18, 2025. It received positive reviews from players.

You are trapped in a small house with psychosis, having lost your memory. Carefully observe your surroundings, distinguish between reality and hallucinations, and take the medication provided by visitors on time to overcome your illness.

Skip Games Like Who's at the door?

Games Like Who's at the door?

Looking for games like Who's at the door?? Here are top survival simulation recommendations with a horror, mystery and thriller focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with The Cabin Factory, Dollmare or The Exit 8.

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

89%Audience ScoreBased on 576 reviews
story67 positive mentions
grinding2 negative mentions

  • Effective and creative jump scares that genuinely surprise players.
  • Strong psychological horror atmosphere with immersive sound and visual design.
  • Engaging anomaly detection gameplay with many unique hallucinations and replayability.
  • Short game length with limited story depth and somewhat predictable plot.
  • Overuse of AI-generated art and voice acting detracts from immersion for some players.
  • Some mechanics and instructions are unclear or confusing, making the game frustrating at times.
  • story

    151 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    44% positive mentions, 53% neutral mentions, 3% negative mentions

    The game's story is notably more developed than typical anomaly horror titles, featuring an interesting, atmospheric narrative conveyed through notes, broadcasts, and occasional cutscenes. While many find the plot predictable and somewhat short, the storytelling approach, twists, and integration with gameplay maintain engagement and contribute to a creepy, immersive experience. Overall, the story is appreciated for its uniqueness and mood, though some desire more depth and content.

    • “The story touched on some very dark topics (which I appreciate in horror games), and I loved exploring the house and slowly learning the story behind everything as we gathered more and more info.”
    • “The core gameplay is simple on the surface, but the way it layers tension and story makes each in-game day feel unpredictable.”
    • “The narrative unfolds through environmental storytelling and sparse internal monologues rather than explicit exposition. This approach keeps the story deliberately ambiguous, emphasizing the uncertainty at the heart of the experience.”
    • “A lot of fun, though the story is hot garbage and the ending could be predicted a mile off; the scares are a riot, the cursed character designs are fun, and the general atmosphere and presentation is great.”
    • “Honestly, I had the entire story figured out within the first 20 minutes and then it just became a 'get to the end as quick as possible' puzzle.”
    • “As I said, even though they did a lot of alluding to the contrary and tried basic misdirection tactics, the story was so basic that you easily figured it out within the first 20 minutes of playing.”
  • gameplay

    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    22% positive mentions, 70% neutral mentions, 8% negative mentions

    The gameplay centers on pattern recognition, anomaly spotting, and tension-building decisions, creating a simple yet psychologically engaging loop reminiscent of similar horror titles like Exit-8. While some find the mechanics somewhat repetitive or obscure, many appreciate its effective scares, atmospheric pacing, and narrative integration, despite occasional criticisms about limited depth and the underused door-opening mechanic. Overall, it offers a brief but immersive experience for fans of psychological horror and observational gameplay.

    • “The apartment layout works very well for the gameplay, and while the atmosphere can be inconsistent, the game still delivers several genuinely effective scares and panic-inducing moments.”
    • “The core gameplay is simple on the surface, but the way it layers tension and story makes each in-game day feel unpredictable.”
    • “The core gameplay revolves around pattern recognition and decision-making.”
    • “Others might see it as limiting, as the lack of varied gameplay elements can make certain sequences feel repetitive once the core loop is understood.”
    • “Despite being advertised as the main thing for the game, you know....., who's at the door, you literally have zero reasons to open the door or even look to check out who's behind it, in fact opening the door results in you losing every single time so you just stop opening it. There seems to be no side effect to that, in fact you can go through the entire game without looking through the hole once. It almost seems like a mechanic that was supposed to be in the game but the dev kinda just gave up on it...”
    • “The use of AI makes the game feel rushed and sloppy especially in a genre where you have to feel immersed. It's something that really detracts, even ignoring that the gameplay isn't anything new and the narrative felt lacking.”
  • graphics

    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    58% positive mentions, 29% neutral mentions, 13% negative mentions

    The graphics are consistently praised for their impressive, realistic yet slightly desaturated aesthetic that effectively enhances the eerie atmosphere. Visuals range from high-quality, detailed environments and anomalies to well-executed creepy scenes and jumpscares, contributing significantly to the overall immersive and terrifying experience. Some users noted minor drawbacks like AI-generated artwork feeling less authentic, but overall, the graphics are considered a strong and standout aspect of the game.

    • “The graphics are impressive, and the anomalies are genuinely interesting.”
    • “Adopts a realistic but slightly desaturated aesthetic that enhances the atmosphere of decay and confusion.”
    • “The creepy atmosphere and high-quality graphics are absolutely satisfying—I'm really impressed!”
    • “Biggest downside is the use of AI for artwork within the game.”
    • “For example, artwork and objects on walls I was hoping (and sure) would trick me never did.”
    • “The apartment has a worn 90s aesthetic with dated furniture, an aquarium, and an old television.”
  • atmosphere

    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    50% positive mentions, 36% neutral mentions, 14% negative mentions

    The game excels in creating a uniquely eerie and unsettling atmosphere, effectively balancing psychological unease with well-timed jump scares. Its realistic, slightly desaturated aesthetic and thoughtful pacing enhance the sense of tension and decay, delivering memorable, panic-inducing moments despite some minor inconsistencies. Overall, the atmosphere is a standout feature that significantly contributes to the game's immersive and haunting experience.

    • “Who’s at the door is a psychological anomaly-finder that leans hard into unease, uncertainty, and atmosphere rather than cheap scares.”
    • “It’s an exercise in restraint and atmosphere, a haunting portrayal of fear born not from monsters but from the uncertain depths of the human mind.”
    • “Its pacing and atmosphere are spot-on, with just the right balance of tension and jump scares to make every encounter memorable.”
    • “The 'cinematics' were goofy as hell and really broke the atmosphere the game was setting up for you.”
    • “But in all honesty, this is all nitpicking. This is a $3 indie game; for the price, this game absolutely delivers. If you want to have fun and get scared for an hour (maybe an hour and a half because I spent 30 minutes trying to figure out why I kept losing every time I opened the door, although there were no hallucinations in sight), then go for it. Just don't get your hopes up for the other (non-jumpscare/scary atmosphere) parts of the game.”
    • “While the atmosphere can be inconsistent, the game still delivers several genuinely effective scares and panic-inducing moments.”
  • replayability

    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    36% positive mentions, 37% neutral mentions, 27% negative mentions

    The game offers solid replayability through multiple endings, varied anomalies to discover, and an intense, atmospheric experience that encourages multiple playthroughs. However, some users feel the replay value is limited due to the game's short length and predictability. Overall, replayability is a strong aspect but may vary depending on player expectations.

    • “This replayability enhances the thematic focus on perception, as what seemed true in one playthrough may feel illusory in another.”
    • “There are over 60 anomalies to detect, so it has significant replay value.”
    • “It's short, like an hour or two, but super intense and replayable with different endings; I will be trying out endless mode as well soon.”
    • “The only downside I can think of is that there isn't a lot of replay value, but for the price it is more than worth it.”
    • “The second biggest drawback is the lack of replayability.”
    • “The game is short but highly re-playable.”
  • humor

    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game's humor blends silly, random moments with creepy yet playfully designed characters, creating a unique mix of scares and laughs. Players appreciate the balance between unsettling visuals and amusing elements, making the experience both fresh and entertaining.

    • “One time I couldn't stop laughing when the cabinet started sliding to me; it was just such a silly and random moment.”
    • “Don't even mention the characters—they look like cursed humans made on a budget, had me laughing straight after jumping out of my chair.”
    • “The characters look scary but at the same time have a playfulness about them that makes them a little bit funny too. They got it balanced just right, and the outcome is they look very creepy and unsettling.”
  • character development

    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    71% positive mentions, 29% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The character development is highly praised for its unique, unsettling, and creatively designed characters that effectively contribute to the game's eerie atmosphere and scares. While the story may be lacking, the distinctive and memorable character designs enhance the overall experience.

    • “Loved the gross and weird character designs.”
    • “Scared me more than any horror game has for a while, love the character design and was 100% a fun experience.”
    • “Good use of sound design and character design to create an ongoing feeling of unease.”
  • grinding

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    Users find the grinding aspect tedious and annoying rather than engaging or scary, criticizing the game's AI and overall design as repetitive and uninspired. Some feel that positive reviews may mislead new players, especially younger audiences influenced by streamers.

    • “The fact this has good reviews makes me want to off myself because of how bad, tedious, not scary, AI slop is now a viable strategy to get a streamer to play it and have them gas it up to their young audience and form their opinion for them.”
  • music

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game forgoes a traditional musical score, using ambient sounds and dynamic environmental cues instead, which enhances immersion and maintains a tense atmosphere.

    • “The absence of a traditional musical score further deepens the immersion; instead, the game relies on ambient noise and dynamic environmental cues to keep the player on edge.”
  • optimization

    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game demonstrates impressive optimization for a UE5 title, delivering smooth performance without the common issue of lumen noise.

    • “Props for being a UE5 game with good performance and not covered in lumen noise.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Who's at the door?

Play Times

2h Median play time
2h Average play time
2-2h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Who's at the door? is a survival simulation game with horror, mystery and thriller themes. Common tags for Who's at the door? include first-person, indie, psychological, psychological horror, retro and others.

Who's at the door? is available on Nintendo Switch, PC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4 and others.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing Who's at the door?.

Who's at the door? was released on July 18, 2025.

Who's at the door? was developed by SKONEC Entertainment.

Who's at the door? has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Who's at the door? for its story but disliked it for its grinding.

Who's at the door? is a single player game.

Similar games include The Cabin Factory, Dollmare, The Exit 8, The Mortuary Assistant, From The Darkness and others.