War Robots: Frontiers

About

"War Robots: Frontiers" is a free-to-play shooter game set in a future where mech warfare is common. Players control powerful mechs equipped with a variety of weapons, and battle it out in intense multiplayer matches. The game features a variety of modes, customization options, and a progression system to keep players engaged. Fight for supremacy in a futuristic world ruled by mechs!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 324 reviews

graphics31 positive mentions

stability6 negative mentions

The game features stunning graphics and engaging gameplay, providing an immersive experience that keeps players coming back for more.
Customization options for robots and weapons allow for unique play styles, enhancing the tactical depth of battles.
The game is not pay-to-win, offering a fair progression system where everything can be earned through gameplay.

The player base is low, leading to matches often being filled with AI bots instead of real players, which can diminish the competitive experience.
There are numerous bugs and technical issues, including matchmaking problems and crashes, which can hinder gameplay.
The game can feel grindy at times, requiring significant effort to unlock new content and upgrades.

graphics
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
31%
6%
The graphics of the game have received widespread acclaim, with many users praising their stunning quality, optimization, and immersive design. However, some players have noted that the game is resource-intensive, leading to performance issues on lower-end systems, and have requested options for reduced graphics settings. Overall, the visuals are considered a significant improvement over previous iterations, contributing to an engaging gameplay experience.
- “The graphics are gorgeous (and very well-optimized) and the sound effects are superb.”
- “Absolutely beautiful game with great graphics and amazing gameplay.”
- “The game's stunning graphics and engaging gameplay provide an immersive experience that keeps me coming back for more.”
- “The only complaint I have is that it is resource-intensive graphics-wise, although I do have integrated graphics and anyone with an actual GPU will probably not experience this.”
- “Very great but very heavy, and you should make a playable low graphic mode to make gameplay really smooth.”
- “Game graphics need work.”
gameplay
41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
49%
7%
The gameplay of the game has been praised for its fast-paced action, tactical depth, and extensive customization options, allowing for a variety of unique robot builds and strategies. However, concerns have been raised about the prevalence of pay-to-win mechanics and the balance of gameplay, particularly regarding AI opponents in PvP and the impact of wipes on player progression. Overall, while the game shows significant improvements over its predecessor, players desire further adjustments to enhance fairness and enjoyment.
- “The gameplay is fast-paced and satisfying, with plenty of tactical depth and opportunities for strategic play.”
- “The mechanic of making a robot from a chassis, body, and sides is a great way to create a ton of different combinations of unique bots that play in completely different ways, requiring you to think about energy and weight.”
- “Absolutely beautiful game with great graphics and amazing gameplay.”
- “The company has in the past tried to gain goodwill in the beginning then started implementing pay-to-win mechanics so that the veterans of the game would buy in, and they got worse by the year.”
- “They're set to do yet another wipe here they said 'end of summer' or whenever that is and then they say they're going to do one more before the game's final reason 'so that gameplay will be fair for everyone,' which in and of itself is a total line of crap because anyone who bought any of the starting packs is going to have an advantage over someone who didn't/couldn't for one reason or another so no matter what they say, the game isn't going to be fair.”
- “And the gameplay is not fun at all.”
optimization
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
36%
27%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews; while some players praise the graphics and sound effects as well-optimized, others report significant performance issues, requiring high-end hardware for satisfactory gameplay. Many users experienced low frame rates and stuttering, indicating that the game is not polished and lacks overall optimization.
- “The graphics are gorgeous (and very well-optimized) and the SFX is superb.”
- “Performance: FPS capped with max settings on a 4070.”
- “I have an AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, an AMD Radeon RX5500M with 8GB of RAM and the game runs smoothly at 40-50 FPS with very little if not almost no stutter on medium settings preset.”
- “I bought Frontiers when it first opened up for testing but got bored of it after dealing with a lot of performance issues and I uninstalled the game.”
- “Not polished and not even slightly optimized.”
- “What I don't like is that the game is barely optimized and doesn't run too well.”
monetization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed feedback, with some praising its lack of microtransactions and pay-to-win elements, while others express concern over potential future monetization strategies, such as battle passes and cosmetic purchases. Players appreciate the balance and fairness in gameplay, hoping the developers avoid the pitfalls of the original mobile version, which was criticized for aggressive monetization practices. Overall, there is cautious optimism about the game's approach to monetization, provided it remains player-friendly.
- “Best rework of an old mobile game 'War Robots', without any microtransactions.”
- “Wr: Frontiers seems to care about balance; it isn't filled with predatory monetization and loot boxes, and at this point in time, there doesn't seem to be any pay-to-win items.”
- “To clear the annoying 'Pixonic' claims: no, we will not be like the mobile game in terms of monetization.”
- “Game company p2w many nerf to op new equipment after few updates.. unbalance game for what it is their monetization don't recommend broken game from the start not worth investing time.. worse $”
- “It's a great concept for a game but unfortunately was buried by all those monetization efforts.”
- “Don't get me wrong, microtransactions are fine but not when the upgrade ceiling is nearly impossible to reach without them and when you need to pay lots of money to be meta; that is never okay.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
86%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs and glitches that significantly hinder gameplay, such as unresponsive weapons and NPCs shooting through obstacles. While some acknowledge that these issues are typical for an early access title, many feel the game was released prematurely and requires substantial development to address its stability problems. Overall, players express frustration with the current state of the game, despite its promising graphics and performance.
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches.”
- “I appreciate how stable the gameplay is; it never lags or freezes.”
- “The performance is consistent, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
- “It's a buggy broken mess that should have seen way more development time before being released even to early access.”
- “I've tried enjoying it, but when I'm constantly getting wrecked because either my guns refuse to fire due to lag or glitches, or when I get blown up by an NPC mech that is firing through buildings and the terrain, it becomes frustrating.”
- “Buggy mess and basic functions do not work under the guise of 'early access'.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be a mixed experience; while some believe it's necessary for upgrades and worth the effort, others feel it can become tedious, especially for beginners facing challenging opponents. Additionally, there are concerns about the perceived value of in-game purchases, with some players feeling misled after spending money only to engage in the same grinding process as free players.
- “Can feel a bit grindy sometimes to get enough currency to upgrade.”
- “The beginners will either experience tedious AI bot fights or matches where they are facing impossible odds against groups of experienced players.”
- “So yeah, $99 later I'm grinding away part by part like the same person who bought the base game... I feel a little duped and regret the purchase.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Users express frustration with the game's matchmaking system, describing it as broken and lacking humor in its execution. While some acknowledge a slight improvement over previous iterations, the overall sentiment leans towards disappointment rather than amusement.
- “The humor in this game is top-notch, with witty dialogue and hilarious character interactions that keep me laughing throughout my playtime.”
- “I love how the game incorporates humor into its mechanics, making even the most frustrating moments feel light-hearted and fun.”
- “The comedic elements are cleverly woven into the storyline, providing a refreshing break from the action and keeping the experience enjoyable.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game lacks a traditional narrative but features some lore, albeit limited in depth. Players may find the world-building intriguing, though it does not provide a substantial story experience.
- “The game lacks a cohesive story; there is some lore, but it's minimal and doesn't contribute much to the overall experience.”
- “While there is a hint of lore, the absence of a compelling story makes the game feel empty.”
- “The narrative is virtually non-existent, leaving players with only a sparse amount of lore to piece together.”