Vivez Versailles

About

Vivez Versailles is a single player simulation game. It was developed by makemepulse and was released on July 5, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Experience Versailles" invites you to live two historical events that took place at the Palace of Versailles : the visit of the siamese ambassadors during Louis XIV's reign, and the Yew Tree Ball, organized by Louis XV.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 30 reviews

story3 negative mentions

The game offers a captivating virtual tour of historical Versailles, providing an immersive experience of life during the reign of Louis XIV.
The attention to detail in the architecture and historical context enhances the educational value, making it a great resource for history enthusiasts.
As a free experience, it provides a unique opportunity to learn about French history in an engaging way, despite its limitations.

The experience lacks meaningful interaction and exploration, as players are restricted to pre-arranged scenes with limited movement options.
Performance issues, including low frame rates and technical bugs, detract from the overall experience, making it less enjoyable for some users.
The graphics and character models are outdated, which may disappoint those expecting a more polished visual experience.

optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The optimization of the experience is criticized for long loading times, bugs, and overall poor performance, especially when compared to other VR applications. Reviewers express that significant improvements are necessary for the experience to be enjoyable.
- “This experience needs a lot of optimization before it's enjoyable for most players.”
- “But until its performance is greatly improved, I won't be launching it again.”
- “The loading times to jump from room to room are quite long; optimization is needed.”
- “Also, the loading times to jump from room/event to room/event are pretty long - optimization?”
- “This free experience is not only very short and plain, but also slightly buggy and has very poor performance.”
- “Poor performance compared to most other VR apps.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics of the game are generally considered outdated, reminiscent of 1990s visuals, with limited NPC motion and no graphic settings available. While some players appreciate the nostalgic aesthetic, others feel that an upgrade in graphics would significantly enhance the experience. Overall, the visuals may not meet the expectations of those seeking modern graphical fidelity.
- “Very immersive educational experience, though an improvement on the graphics would be greatly appreciated.”
- “Visuals-wise, however, do not expect to be blown away by the 1990 graphics and limited NPC's range of motion; I personally liked it because it reminded me of Versailles 1685, a great (yet little-known) historical intrigue game from the 90s, but others may not like it very much.”
- “Also, there are no graphic settings.”
- “Visually, however, do not expect to be blown away by the 1990 graphics and limited NPCs' range of motion; I personally liked it because it reminded me of Versailles 1685, a great (yet little-known) historical intrigue game from the 90s, but others may not like it very much.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The story is well-structured and effectively utilizes the Oculus Quest 2's room-scale capabilities, allowing players to navigate the environment, though it leans more towards a guided narrative than open exploration.
- “The story is more structured than just exploring the Versailles.”
- “This is quite good; it works on the Oculus Quest 2, and you can walk around the area if you use the room-scale boundary.”
- “More of a structured story than exploring the Versailles.”
- “The narrative felt disjointed and lacked depth.”
- “Character development was minimal, making it hard to connect with anyone.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is criticized for lacking meaningful interaction and progression, leading to the conclusion that it does not qualify as a game and is not recommended for gamers.
- “There are no gameplay loops or meaningful interaction, no progression, etc. This is not a game; I can't recommend this to gamers.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is criticized for being buggy and exhibiting poor performance, which detracts from the overall experience. Additionally, users note that the short and simplistic nature of the game further compounds these issues.
- “This free experience is not only very short and plain, but also slightly buggy and has very poor performance.”