Urban War Defense

About Urban War Defense

Urban War Defense is a single player tactical management game. It was developed by Budgie Games and was released on July 8, 2017. It received negative reviews from players.

Lead through a action packed fast paced tower defense game with a story of an invasion on your homeland by a large foreign force and as a newly appointed commander do what you can to help your country fight back and defend against this enemy force which is approaching from the coast.

Skip Games Like Urban War Defense

Looking for games like Urban War Defense? Here are top tactical management recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Godus Wars, Godus or HERO DEFENSE.

12%647reviews

Godus Wars

2016

Casual Real-time Strategy

22%4.4kreviews

Godus

2014

Open World Racing

68%486reviews

HERO DEFENSE

2016

Role Playing

29%665reviews

Dragon: The Game

2014

Role Playing

53%5.1kreviews

Castle Story

2017

Open World Real-time Strategy

50%1.6kreviews

EDEN STAR

2015

Shooter

38%2.2kreviews

Folk Tale

2013

Role Playing

65%1.2kreviews

Alien Creeps TD

2014

Strategy

73%1.7kreviews

Battle Strategy: Tower Defense

Casual Strategy

69%834reviews

Kingdom Wars 2: Battles

2015

Real-time Strategy

More games like Urban War Defense

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

3%Audience ScoreBased on 61 reviews

graphics2 negative mentions

Graphics are acceptable for the genre, tolerable despite being far from good.
The game could be fun for tower defense enthusiasts if further developed.
It has potential for game collectors who enjoy unique or lesser-known titles.

The game is unoptimized and lacks depth, with only one mode and minimal content.
The developer has revoked keys from legitimate buyers, leading to distrust and frustration.
Gameplay is repetitive and lacks strategic depth, making it unengaging over time.

graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions
The graphics of the game received mixed reviews; while some users found them lacking and not up to standard, others considered them reasonable, especially for a tower defense game. Overall, opinions vary widely, with some players able to overlook the graphics in favor of gameplay.
- “I do enjoy tower defense games, and I thought the graphics for this game were reasonable.”
- “Not good, far from that, but I can tolerate a wide variety from ASCII graphics to realistic.”
- “I'd like to have given this a thumbs up as I do enjoy tower defense games, but I thought the graphics for this game were reasonable.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with users describing it as an unoptimized and mediocre experience that fails to inspire continued play.
- “An unoptimized mediocre mess, nothing inspiring in it to play further.”
- “The game runs poorly on even high-end systems, making it frustrating to play.”
- “Frequent crashes and long loading times indicate a lack of proper optimization.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The music in the game has been criticized for its poor quality, with some users likening it to a malfunctioning sound server.
- “The music sounds like my sound server is broken.”
- “The soundtrack is repetitive and lacks variety.”
- “The audio quality is poor, making it hard to enjoy the game.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The story aspect received criticism for lacking depth and coherence, with users noting that there was no clear narrative or reasoning to engage with.
- “There was no story or reasoning behind it.”
- “The plot felt disjointed and lacked coherence.”
- “Character motivations were poorly developed and unconvincing.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The gameplay is currently limited and lacks depth, featuring only four maps with minimal enemy waves, resulting in about 10 to 15 minutes of playtime per map and a total of around an hour of content. Players find the experience lacking in replay value and overall detail, especially when compared to established titles.
- “The game itself is listed as early access and under Budgie Games, which is close to Bungie's spelling, but the game was far from the level of detail or play mechanics that Bungie would ever put out.”
- “This game right now lacks any depth as it only offers 4 maps a month after it has launched in early access. Four maps might be fine if each map offered more than 3 waves of enemies, but nope, you get about 10 to 15 minutes of gameplay on each map or maybe an hour's worth of total content with near no replay value.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game currently suffers from low replayability, offering only four maps with minimal content, resulting in about an hour of gameplay. Players find the lack of depth and variety in enemy waves significantly limits the incentive to revisit the game. Overall, the current state suggests a poor value for the asking price.
- “This game right now lacks any depth as it only offers 4 maps a month after it has launched in early access. 4 maps might be fine if each map offered more than 3 waves of enemies, but nope, you get about 10 to 15 minutes of gameplay on each map or maybe an hour's worth of total content with near no replay value.”
- “This game mostly just suffers from zero replay value, only about an hour's worth of content right now and an asking price for the clunky and awkward mess that is here of $10 USD.”