UNI

About

This consists of 30 mini-games that you can enjoy together. You can have a happy time with your friends and family. However, sometimes you may have to prepare for the destruction of friendship.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

+19

47%

Audience ScoreBased on 133 reviews

humor10 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game offers a large collection of 40 mini-games, providing a variety of experiences for local multiplayer fun.
Some mini-games can be entertaining and provide a good laugh, especially when played with friends.
It's a decent time-killer for casual gaming sessions, particularly for families or younger audiences.

The controls are poorly designed and often confusing, making gameplay frustrating, especially with keyboard input.
Many of the mini-games are uninspired, underdeveloped, and lack clear instructions, leading to a lack of engagement.
The game is limited to local multiplayer, which restricts its appeal and usability in today's gaming environment.

graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game are described as simple and child-friendly, featuring a bright art style that appeals to a younger demographic. However, many users criticize the visuals as lacking depth and quality, comparing them to clipart and noting janky physics that contribute to a generic, flash-game feel. Overall, while the graphics may be adequate for casual fun, they fall short of expectations for a more polished gaming experience.
- “The graphics and mini-games are simple but good enough to have fun!”
- “Everything about the mini-games is incredibly child-friendly as well, from the bright art style to simple controls.”
- “The art style is pretty simple and kind of childish but acceptable.”
- “My main point is that not only there's no option to play against AI, this game has a fair share of problems ranging from hideous graphics (I know you're going for that family-friendly feel, but c'mon) to a lacking soundtrack, often consisting of up to 9-second long loops.”
- “The graphics and artwork are so cringe that it feels like they just got somebody to rip off stock images from the internet, or they hired some random homeless dude that had skill in smearing brown on walls.”
- “Besides, the physics are janky, and the graphics and sound both feel generic and flash-gamey.”
humor
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in game #30 is characterized by its funny animations and a mix of mini-games that range from great to hilariously bad, making it enjoyable for casual play with friends. While some players appreciate the comedic value of the poorly designed mini-games, others find the control scheme frustrating, leading to laughter at the game's absurdities rather than its intended fun. Overall, it offers a brief, entertaining experience, particularly when played for free.
- “Funny game to play together with your amigo.”
- “Some of the mini games are great, some are good, some are terrible and some outright hilarious.”
- “The most fun we had playing this was laughing at the bottom tier of mini-games because of how shockingly bad they were.”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with users describing it as nauseating, abrasive, and repetitive, often consisting of short loops that detract from the overall experience. While some tracks are noted as potentially enjoyable, they are overshadowed by the poor quality and volume of the soundtrack, which feels more like a dated parody than an engaging audio backdrop.
- “In addition to that, there are a bunch of music tracks that pop in here and there, which might be the best part of the game as a whole.”
- “The sound effects and music create a unique atmosphere that feels like a blend of a 2010 internet meme and a 90s game show.”
- “The music adds a distinct character to the game, even if it is somewhat repetitive.”
- “The sound effects and music make this feel like a 2010 sh*tpost combined with a 90s game show.”
- “My main point is that not only is there no option to play against AI, this game has a fair share of problems ranging from hideous graphics (I know you're going for that family-friendly feel, but c'mon) to a lacking soundtrack, often consisting of up to 9-second long loops.”
- “The music is nauseating, abrasive, short, and repetitive.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The gameplay is criticized for its simplistic mechanics and wonky execution, drawing comparisons to "Fusion Frenzy" but with less depth, as all games are limited to two players. While some users appreciate the effort behind the design, the overall experience is marred by broken mechanics and subpar sound effects.
- “Gameplay is engaging and offers a variety of mechanics that keep things interesting.”
- “I appreciate the effort put into the gameplay, especially during the current times.”
- “Bad gameplay.”
- “Mechanics are extremely wonky and broken, but I do appreciate the effort put into this, especially during the current times.”
- “Sort of like Fusion Frenzy but with simpler mechanics, and all games have 2 players.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The story aspect of the game has been criticized for lacking any form of emergent storytelling or narrative depth, leaving players feeling that there is no meaningful plot development or engagement.
- “Not even an inkling of emergent storytelling, not even a vague attempt.”
- “The narrative feels disjointed and lacks any real depth or engagement.”
- “Character development is minimal, making it hard to care about their journeys.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviewers suggest that the game's monetization strategy could be improved by transitioning to a browser format with online PvP support and incorporating advertising, which may enhance its success.
- “In my opinion, this game would have been more successful as a browser game with online PvP support and some advertising.”
- “The monetization model feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “I find the in-game purchases to be overpriced and not worth the value they provide.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users report that the game exhibits excellent stability, with no glitches or technical issues encountered.
- “No glitches whatsoever found.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes.”
- “I experienced consistent performance throughout my playtime.”