Two Digits
- May 17, 2015
- Cleverweek
Two Digits is a challenging number puzzle game where players must select two subsets from nine given numbers, all below 100, to achieve the same sum. Developed by Cleverweek, a team of two passionate brothers, the game features minimalistic design and simple gameplay that provides a satisfying and engaging experience. Prepare to test your logical thinking and strategizing skills as you dive into this unique and captivating game.
Reviews
- Fun minimalist puzzle that challenges players' math skills.
- Offers a randomization mode for endless replayability.
- Simple and clean design with a calming soundtrack.
- Gameplay becomes repetitive and lacks variety across 250 levels.
- Controls are clunky, requiring multiple clicks to assign numbers to groups.
- Difficulty does not progress meaningfully, making some levels feel too easy.
- music36 mentions
- 39 % positive mentions
- 53 % neutral mentions
- 8 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its calming and soothing qualities, while others find it repetitive and lacking variety, as there is only one track available. While the soundtrack complements the gameplay for some, others have reported issues with the music not playing automatically and described it as potentially infuriating during extended play. Overall, the music enhances the casual experience for some players, but its limitations detract from the enjoyment for others.
“This beautiful game has one of the best music I have ever heard in a while and it's really fun to spend time with.”
“The soundtrack is very soothing as well.”
“Incredibly simple & calming game, with very chill music; creating a superb casual experience.”
“Music & sound: 0/10 --- not sure if it's just me, but I didn't hear any sounds or music.”
“Music so bad I had to mute it.”
“Just imagine solving 250 identical number problems, while listening to the same elevator music on a loop!”
- gameplay25 mentions
- 28 % positive mentions
- 60 % neutral mentions
- 12 % negative mentions
The gameplay is centered around a simple yet repetitive puzzle mechanic where players must select two subsets of numbers that equal the same sum, with a difficulty rating of around 2 out of 10. While the minimalist design and straightforward instructions appeal to puzzle enthusiasts, many reviewers find the lack of innovation and depth across 250 levels leads to a mechanical and tedious experience. Overall, the game offers a basic mental challenge but may not sustain interest due to its repetitive nature and minimal progression.
“The gameplay concept is simple: you are given a board with 9 numbers and you need to separate them to find 2 different combinations that give both sides the exact same number to progress to the next level.”
“I'd rate the game's difficulty at a modest 2 out of 10, thanks to its straightforward gameplay and clear instructions: your task is simple: given 9 numbers under 100, select two subsets with the same sum.”
“Easy, straightforward gameplay with 250 levels and a random generator mode for you to enjoy.”
“Lazy Android port with a good concept but extremely repetitive gameplay; completing all 250 levels is borderline unbearable even with a guide.”
“You only ever solve the exact same kind of puzzles; no new mechanics are introduced later on.”
“It's just still the same without any innovation or perceptible gameplay change.”
- graphics10 mentions
- 30 % positive mentions
- 40 % neutral mentions
- 30 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are generally well-received, with scores around 8-9/10, praised for their minimalist aesthetic and pleasing visuals that suit the puzzle genre. However, some users noted a need for optimization, as performance issues were reported despite the simple design. Overall, while the graphics are appealing, they may not resonate with all players, particularly those seeking more intense visual experiences.
“Graphics: 9/10”
“At the very least, I did not encounter any issues or bugs with the game and the visuals were pleasing.”
“Intuitive interface and minimalist graphics/sound is perfect for this genre.”
“The graphics are okay for a puzzler, but the challenge was not there.”
“The graphics need to be optimized further; my CPU fan revs oddly for such a minimalist design.”
“For an educational game, it wouldn't be that bad, but as a puzzle game on Steam, it might be hitting the wrong core demographic.”
- optimization7 mentions
- 29 % positive mentions
- 29 % neutral mentions
- 43 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's optimization has received criticism for performance issues, including potential memory leaks and inefficient graphics, particularly given its minimalist design. Users have noted that the mobile port's controls feel awkward and could be simplified, while the layout and responsiveness of certain features, like the reset button, require improvement. Despite being optimized for mobile devices, the game is perceived as an "unoptimized mess" that fails to meet expectations.
“Controls could be a lot simpler, optimization a lot better, layout as well (why is the sum of green on one side of the screen and the red on the right?) and the reset button should work instantly.”
“[*] optimized for mobile devices (controls + display)”
“The graphics need to be optimized further; my CPU fan revs oddly for such a minimalist design.”
“The problem is that this game is a mobile port and has awkward tap-optimized controls.”
“Secondly, this thing is an unoptimized mess.”
- replayability5 mentions
- 40 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 60 % negative mentions
The game offers significant replayability through its random level generator, providing endless challenges for players. However, some users feel that once the game is mastered, it may not hold long-term interest, suggesting that while it has potential for replay, it may not justify a full purchase for everyone. Overall, the balance between the number of levels and the random mode contributes positively to its replay value.
“I think the full price is acceptable since the random level generator adds a lot of replay value and it is a well-polished game.”
“Short and simple game but responsive devs. Already has infinite replay value due to the 'random level' feature.”
“But for replay value, I can't suggest anyone buys it - it'll last you until you finish it (which likely won't take too long once you figure out how it works - the tutorial could use some video or pictures, more instruction than the one or two sentences it consists of), but for a challenging game, three digits is tougher and better as a game.”
“Short and simple game, but responsive devs. Already has infinite replay value due to the 'random level' feature.”
“However, the random mode offers endless replayability for those seeking fresh challenges.”
- story3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its absence, with reviewers noting a complete lack of narrative, characters, and voice acting. While the progression mechanics are deemed good, they ultimately become repetitive without a compelling story to support them.
“The bad part is that there's no story, no characters, no voice acting, nada.”
“Story/progression: 15/20 - no story, so judged purely on progression, which is good but gets repetitive.”
“Story - n/a”
- grinding2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game can become tedious and somewhat boring towards the end, particularly due to the repetitive nature of resetting numbers, but it generally does not overstay its welcome.
“It approaches boring and grindy toward the end but does not go too far to wear out its welcome.”
“It was a little tedious resetting the numbers every time.”
- emotional2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Users express a sense of emotional frustration with the lack of progression in the game, describing it as an "infinite loop of mediocrity." Additionally, there is a sentiment that certain gameplay mechanics, such as touch controls, could enhance the emotional engagement and overall enjoyment of the experience.
- stability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Users report stability issues, particularly on Windows tablets, where the game experiences glitches that prevent scrolling on the level screen, necessitating frequent restarts.
“I play this on my Windows tablet, and it glitches out where you can't scroll down on the level screen after using it for a bit, forcing a restart every once in a while.”
“The game crashes frequently, making it nearly impossible to progress without losing progress.”
“I've experienced constant lag and freezing, which ruins the overall experience.”