"Tour de France 2024" is a cycling simulation game where players can compete in multiplayer Criterium mode with up to 6 players. Create your own team of 2 riders from over 900 professional cyclists and choose a unique jersey to stand out. Adapt your strategy to the stage, as your riders' characteristics are randomly set at the start of each game, ensuring a level playing field. Each session's result affects your points and progress towards race victories. New riders and jerseys are unlocked weekly, allowing for team customization.

  • PC
  • Play​station 4
  • Windows
  • Xbox Series X|S
  • Play​Station
  • Xbox

Reviews

52%
Audience ScoreBased on 26 reviews
graphics3 negative mentions
  • The game offers endless hours of enjoyment with engaging gameplay and new features, making it a fun experience for cycling fans.
  • The AI has shown significant improvement, enhancing the overall gameplay experience compared to previous versions.
  • The new multiplayer mode adds variety and choice, making the game more enjoyable and engaging.
  • The game suffers from technical issues, including crashes and bugs that hinder the overall experience.
  • Many players feel that the game is too similar to previous iterations, lacking significant updates or improvements.
  • The division of content between Pro Cycling Manager and Tour de France feels like a cash grab, leaving players with two incomplete experiences instead of a cohesive game.
  • graphics4 mentions

    The graphics in the game are generally considered outdated, with many reviewers noting a clunky interface and visuals that fail to meet modern standards, particularly in the context of sports games. While there are slight improvements, the overall aesthetic feels trapped in the past, detracting from the gameplay experience.

    • “Its fun and has good graphics, just no licensed TT bikes and might take some time to get an accurate update.”
    • “However, the graphics, user interface, and actual gameplay mechanics feel trapped in the past.”
    • “It's a strategy game bogged down by outdated visuals and a clunky interface that has seen minimal evolution over the years.”
    • “Yet, it suffers from its own setbacks: the graphics, while a slight improvement, still feel below par for modern sports games, and the gameplay mechanics feel more repetitive than rewarding.”
  • gameplay3 mentions

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some praising it as the best iteration in recent years, while others criticize it for outdated graphics and repetitive mechanics that detract from the overall experience.

    • “Gameplay-wise, this is definitely the best version in my view in at least 5+ years of me buying them.”
    • “However, the graphics, user interface, and actual gameplay mechanics feel trapped in the past.”
    • “Yet, it suffers from its own setbacks: the graphics, while a slight improvement, still feel below par for modern sports games, and the gameplay mechanics feel more repetitive than rewarding.”
  • monetization1 mentions

    Reviews indicate that the monetization strategy of the game is perceived as exploitative, with players feeling that the developers prioritize profit over quality, resulting in two incomplete experiences that lack the authenticity of true passion projects.

    • “Until the developers realize that, fans are left with two half-games that feel more like cash grabs than genuine passion projects.”
    • “The monetization strategy is so aggressive that it overshadows the actual gameplay experience.”
    • “It feels like every aspect of the game is designed to push players towards spending more money, rather than enjoying the content.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    Reviewers suggest that the game's replayability could be enhanced by reintroducing classic races from previous editions, as the absence of familiar challenges like mountain races has diminished variety. There is a hope that the developers will take this feedback into account for future releases.

    • “I believe a game series that releases yearly could greatly benefit from continually bringing back races from previous years to enhance its variety and replayability. I hope Cyanide takes note of this, as I subtly missed racing up mountains like Ventoux in this year's edition.”
    • “I think a game series that releases yearly like this one could benefit greatly from continually bringing back races from older years to bolster its variety and replayability. I hope Cyanide takes note of this because I subtly missed racing up mountains like Ventoux in this year's edition.”
    • “The lack of new content makes it hard to justify replaying the game. Once you've completed the main story, there's not much incentive to dive back in.”
    • “While the gameplay is enjoyable, the limited variety in missions and challenges means that replayability suffers significantly. After a few runs, it feels repetitive.”
  • stability1 mentions

    The game's stability is criticized due to frequent crashes and significant bugs in the new criterium mode, which detracts from the overall enjoyment. Additionally, the multiplayer experience in this mode is often populated by bots, further diminishing its appeal.

    • “Enjoyable, but it's still the exact same game as every other year, with the only exception being the criterium mode that is incredibly buggy and not enjoyable. Especially considering that the game crashes all the time and that the 'multiplayer' in the crit mode is almost always just filled with bots.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Tour de France 2024

Videos

Similar Games

Game News