Pro Cycling Manager 2024
- June 6, 2024
- Cyanide Studio
Get on Steam"Pro Cycling Manager 2024" allows you to manage a cycling team, handling aspects such as sponsorship contracts and racer recruitment. Realistic race objectives and varied sponsor expectations create an immersive experience for players. Seasonal and long-term objectives offer diverse challenges to conquer, taking team management to new heights.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers a good balance between spreadsheet management and controllable gameplay, making it enjoyable for cycling enthusiasts.
- The new Sponsor page is a positive addition, allowing for better team management and strategy.
- Despite its flaws, the game can be engaging and fun, especially for those who appreciate the tactical elements of cycling.
- The game is plagued by numerous bugs and crashes, particularly in Career Mode, making it frustrating to play.
- Many players feel that the game has not evolved significantly over the years, with outdated graphics and mechanics that feel stuck in the past.
- The AI behavior is often criticized as simplistic and unhelpful, leading to an unbalanced and unenjoyable gameplay experience.
- graphics6 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 17 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The graphics in the game are generally considered nice but are criticized for being outdated and reminiscent of earlier gaming eras, with many reviewers noting a lack of significant improvement since 2016. The user interface and gameplay mechanics also feel clunky and repetitive, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, there is a strong call for a complete overhaul using a modern engine to enhance visual appeal and gameplay.
“As can be expected, the graphics and sounds are nice.”
“Rebase the whole game to a newer engine that actually makes the game a bit more appealing, as we've been dealing with the same faces and graphics since 2016.”
“However, the graphics, user interface, and actual gameplay mechanics feel trapped in the past.”
“It’s a strategy game bogged down by outdated visuals and a clunky interface that has seen minimal evolution over the years.”
“The graphics still look outdated like they’re from 2010 and aren't even well optimized.”
- gameplay4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
The gameplay is criticized for being outdated and repetitive, with mechanics that frustrate rather than engage players. While there are slight improvements in graphics, they still fall short of modern standards, leading to a call for a complete overhaul of the game's systems to enhance the overall experience. Conversely, the racing gameplay is noted as a strong point, compensating for shortcomings in management aspects.
“However, what it lacks on the management side, it more than makes up for in the racing gameplay.”
“However, the graphics, user interface, and actual gameplay mechanics feel trapped in the past.”
“Yet, it suffers from its own setbacks: the graphics, while a slight improvement, still feel below par for modern sports games, and the gameplay mechanics feel more repetitive than rewarding.”
“Please, Cyanide Studios, rethink your approach to these games, talk to the community, rebuild the convoluted, illogical systems that add nothing but frustration to the gameplay and maybe (after what feels like a decade of stagnation) deliver a fresh start for all of us.”
- stability2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting significant bugs in both the campaign and career modes, leading to a frustrating experience. Many players feel that mods are necessary to make the game playable, but even then, issues persist, particularly with the in-race AI.
“You have to install mods to make it playable, and I don't know if it's the mod (WorldDB), which I doubt, or the game, but the campaign is just a buggy mess.”
“The game, and career mode in particular, is very buggy, and the in-race AI is some of the weirdest I have ever seen in this series.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviews indicate that the monetization strategy of the game is perceived as exploitative, with players feeling that the developers prioritize profit over quality, resulting in two incomplete experiences that lack the authenticity of true passion projects.
“Until the developers realize that, fans are left with two half-games that feel more like cash grabs than genuine passion projects.”
“The monetization strategy is so aggressive that it overshadows the actual gameplay experience.”
“It feels like every aspect of the game is designed to push players towards spending more money, rather than enjoying the content.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The game's graphics are considered outdated, resembling those from 2010, and the overall optimization is lacking, leading to a subpar visual experience.
