Tom Clancy's The Division 2

75%
Game Brain Score Based on 7,783 reviews
  • story
  • gameplay
  • graphics
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 Game Cover
Starting at $0Buy now
Get on Steam Get on Xbox Games Store Get on Epic Games Store Get on PS Store

"Tom Clancy's The Division 2" is a third-person shooter set in a near-future Washington D.C., devastated by a viral pandemic. As an agent of the Division, players must work to restore order, build up their base, and investigate the source of the outbreak while battling hostile factions. The game features a vast open world, tactical combat, and a variety of customization options for both weapons and gear.

  • PC
  • Play​station 4
  • Play​station 5
  • Windows
  • Xbox One
  • Xbox Series X|S
  • Cloud
  • Play​Station
  • Uplay
  • Xbox
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

75%
Audience ScoreBased on 7,783 reviews
story303 positive mentions
stability203 negative mentions
  • story1,330 mentions

    The story in "The Division 2" has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it lackluster and repetitive, often describing it as forgettable or derivative compared to the first game. While some appreciate the engaging gameplay and the variety of missions, they note that the narrative feels thin and is often overshadowed by the grind for loot and gear. Overall, the game is seen as more focused on action and multiplayer experiences rather than delivering a compelling story.

    • “The story is great, the gameplay and shooting is clean, and the variety of guns and skills you can use makes for so many possible play styles.”
    • “The game's storyline, set in a post-pandemic Washington, D.C., is engaging and adds depth to the gameplay, making every mission and exploration feel purposeful.”
    • “The story may be simplistic but the side characters and their missions with tangible benefits to society make it a sincerely immersive experience.”
    • “The game's plot is quite frankly forgettable nonsense and the enemies can feel like complete bullet sponges at higher difficulties.”
    • “By the time I'm done with the campaign, I forgot all of the characters in the story; it is that forgettable.”
    • “The story is absolute trash; even the premise is rather sparse.”
  • gameplay648 mentions

    The gameplay of "The Division 2" is generally praised for its smooth mechanics, engaging cover-based shooting, and satisfying combat, making it a solid looter-shooter experience. While many players appreciate the depth of customization and the variety of gameplay options, some criticize the repetitive nature of missions and the grind for gear, which can detract from the overall enjoyment. Technical issues, including crashes and bugs, have also been noted, impacting the gameplay experience for some users.

    • “The gameplay is somewhat intense, with each mission feeling like a mix of strategy and adrenaline-pumping action.”
    • “With its rich world, tight gameplay, and endless customization options, it’s a must-play for fans of the genre.”
    • “The gameplay mechanics in the Division 2 are refined and polished, offering a seamless blend of cover-based shooting, tactical gameplay, and RPG elements.”
    • “Worst gameplay ever.”
    • “The 'conflict' game mode, which is supposed to be PvP, is quite disappointing, with issues in matchmaking and overall gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay loop is your average looter shooter.”
  • graphics387 mentions

    The graphics of the game have received widespread acclaim for their stunning detail and immersive environments, with many players noting the high-quality visuals and dynamic weather effects. While the game runs smoothly on high-end systems, some users have reported performance issues and crashes, particularly when adjusting graphics settings. Overall, the graphics are considered a standout feature, contributing significantly to the game's atmosphere and player experience.

    • “Graphics are competently presented, with achingly beautiful, detail-rich environments, excellent weapon/armor sets, and character designs.”
    • “The level of immersion is further enhanced by the game's stunning graphics and impressive attention to detail, which truly bring the world to life.”
    • “The graphics of the game are visually very eye-catching and thanks to the Snowdrop game engine, this game has high-level technical and artistic graphics.”
    • “The game doesn't remember the settings I select for my graphics/video, enemies constantly walk/shoot through obstacles, and the latency is so much worse than PS5.”
    • “Everything is degraded compared to the original game; even the graphics feel worse, cutscenes look worse, atmosphere barely keeps up, gunplay is nearly the same, and it disappoints me that even scopes still feel clunky after all these years of development.”
    • “Boring looter game with all the guns feeling the same and the graphics are severely outdated for a 2023 game...”
  • stability233 mentions

    The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent crashes, freezes, and various glitches that significantly disrupt gameplay. While some users have noted improvements over time, many still experience persistent issues, particularly on PC, leading to frustration and a recommendation to wait for further fixes before purchasing. Overall, the game is described as fun but plagued by stability problems that detract from the experience.

    • “Over the past 100 hours, I have crashed maybe 5 times; other than that, the game runs great.”
    • “I find the combat and exploration endlessly fun and enjoyable, and I dig the different gadgets you can employ. This game also runs great on the Steam Deck, at a mostly stable 60 fps on low settings, and it still looks very good, too.”
    • “Runs great on Linux through Proton on desktop and Steam Deck.”
    • “This game launched in a fairly content dry buggy state, as most games these days do apparently.”
    • “The game is a buggy, crash-prone mess of an Ubisoft game.”
    • “The fun of playing this game is ruined by the myriad of bugs and glitches that happen during play.”
  • grinding206 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is a significant focus, with many players noting that it can be both enjoyable and tedious. While some appreciate the depth of gear optimization and the thrill of farming for specific items, others find the repetitive nature of grinding missions and the time investment required to achieve optimal builds overwhelming. Overall, the game caters well to fans of grind-heavy looter shooters, but may not appeal to those who prefer a more streamlined experience.

    • “The main game (levels 1-30) is fun enough and not too grindy.”
    • “However, replaying these missions isn't as tedious as it may seem.”
    • “Very fun to play, level up, and gear up; the grind is actually fun and not tedious (for the most part).”
    • “I've been grinding for 2 weeks straight and I still can't get over it.”
    • “The only 'fun' I've found in the game was getting new and better gear; however, that also felt like a waste of time not just because of the grinding, but also the fact I would buy a 'legendary' yellow weapon and think 'ok, now I have a good weapon' only for it to be replaced fairly soon.”
    • “This game leaves me frustrated and drained when I’m doing missions and grinding loot only to crash and not wanting to go back with the expectation in my mind that I’ll crash 20 or 40 minutes later after logging back on.”
  • optimization145 mentions

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting severe performance issues such as stuttering, freezing, and frequent crashes, even on high-end PCs. While some users have experienced smooth gameplay and commendable graphics, the overall consensus indicates that the game is poorly optimized, particularly for AMD hardware, leading to frustration among players. Despite some improvements noted in updates, significant optimization problems persist, making it difficult for many to recommend the game.

    • “The game is well optimized and in-app purchases are only cosmetic.”
    • “My first impression on this game is it is very well optimized, which I'm very surprised; it runs better than Ghost Recon Wildlands, which is more popular on Steam.”
    • “Diverse build variety and targeted loot to help the grind create a much more optimized experience.”
    • “Game is unplayable, stuttering and freezing on top of crashes.”
    • “The only major problem of this game is that it has very poor performance with constant freezing, stuttering and random crashes even on high-end PCs that meet recommended requirements.”
    • “This game is so poorly optimized, I'm using a 1660ti at low graphics and getting sub 60 frames with massive drops to sub 10 fps, don't get this piece of hot garbage for your own sanity.”
  • atmosphere82 mentions

    The atmosphere in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that while it features impressive graphics, dynamic weather systems, and immersive sound design, it falls short compared to the original game's more impactful and memorable atmosphere. Several reviewers appreciate the detailed open world and post-apocalyptic setting, but a significant number express disappointment that the sequel lacks the intense, cold ambiance of Division 1. Overall, while the atmosphere is generally regarded as good, it is often described as a step down from the first installment.

    • “The game has full weather systems and diurnal cycles, which only improves the already palpable atmosphere, and the ambient sound is icing on the cake.”
    • “The game's graphical fidelity, combined with its evocative sound design, creates an atmosphere that is both immersive and emotionally resonant.”
    • “Washington D.C. looks stunning; they really got that post-apocalyptic atmosphere right with nature recovering and reclaiming everything.”
    • “Everything is degraded compared to the original game; even the graphics feel worse, cutscenes look worse, and the atmosphere barely keeps up.”
    • “The main thing this game lacks from Division 1 is the atmosphere it had.”
    • “On the other hand, the game doesn’t have the same atmosphere that the first Division nailed with snowy post-apocalyptic New York.”
  • music53 mentions

    The music in the game has received largely positive feedback, with many reviewers praising the soundtrack as "amazing" and "legendary," effectively enhancing the atmosphere and gameplay experience. While some noted occasional issues with sound quality and a lack of variety in combat music, the overall consensus highlights the music's ability to complement the game's tactical and immersive elements. Voice acting is generally considered adequate, contributing to the game's engaging narrative.

    • “The soundtrack is surprisingly amazing and I absolutely love it; it starts off pretty chill but when those riffs kick in during your first proper mission, damn son.”
    • “Its presentation is sleek, and gun fights are tactical and exhilarating, all complimented by a fantastic espionage synth soundtrack.”
    • “The music deserves an honorable mention, as well as the graphic fidelity.”
    • “It took over an hour for the game to launch, graphics were horrible, sound kept cutting in and out (background sound would disappear but voices would still be going). Music was spotty. Controls would only work sometimes (sprinting was impossible to rely on). Honestly, this is the worst game experience I have ever had. If this is indicative of what Ubisoft is putting out these days, then the company needs to go down in flames.”
    • “The music, or for the most part lack thereof, is pretty weak, so plan to bump your own tunes.”
    • “I am missing the open world music deploying dynamically as you wander through the wasteland of a city, which Division 1 definitely had. This one does have this too, but it's not as constant, hence less noticeable; it's only short little performances. Just wish they were longer and a tad more present.”
  • replayability31 mentions

    Overall, the game boasts high replayability, with numerous missions, side activities, and dynamic gameplay that keeps players engaged. Many reviewers highlight the variety of rewards and build possibilities as strong incentives to replay, although some express concerns about the game's performance on certain platforms. While the replay value is generally praised, a few users note limitations in end-game content and clarity regarding the benefits of replaying certain missions.

    • “This is a deep and interesting game with tons of replayability.”
    • “Replayability is high, with lots of missions and side activities to keep you busy.”
    • “Replayability: 9.5/10, targeted loot and nigh-unlimited build possibilities create amazing incentive for replay.”
    • “I don't get the purpose of replayable main and side missions; the game simply does not tell you the benefit besides loot rewards and XP. It's marked blue on the map and looks like something I've not completed, yet certain other missions do not get the same treatment being marked as 'completed' as they should be, while the ability to replay should always exist.”
    • “But unfortunately, it suffers from a lack of end game replayability.”
    • “I mean, Cyberpunk was 200 times more playable than this.”
  • monetization26 mentions

    The monetization in this game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating that in-game purchases are primarily cosmetic and not overly intrusive. However, some users feel that the presence of microtransactions and DLCs gives the game a cash grab impression, detracting from the overall experience. While the game is enjoyable, concerns about its online-only model and the commercialization of content have led to criticism from a segment of the player base.

    • “This game is really fun in ways it's a remake of the previous game; it has similar features but heavily refined compared to the previous game. Thus far, it has a good story and the in-game purchases aren't intrusive (mostly cosmetic anyway). Either way, good game.”
    • “It's like Destiny 2, but you don't get bombarded with microtransactions, and the only DLC that there is isn't 100 bucks.”
    • “The game is well optimized and in-app purchases are only cosmetic.”
    • “There's no reason this game couldn't function perfectly fine offline (albeit with slightly reduced functionality), which means it's online-only for microtransactions.”
    • “Microtransactions are always poor for a game that you have to pay for anyway.”
    • “I used to like this game but now I'm disappointed with the obvious cash grab that is The Division 2 on Steam.”
  • humor22 mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players finding amusement in both intentional comedic elements and unintentional glitches, such as ragdoll physics and absurd gameplay moments. While some enjoy the chaotic fun of multiplayer sessions, others criticize the game for being dull or frustrating, leading to a love-hate relationship where players still find humor in its shortcomings. Overall, the game's humor is often derived from its quirky mechanics and the social interactions it fosters among friends.

    • “Countdown is its own hilarious experience... it's endgame, 8-player matchmaking, 15-minute mission, that involves running around completing objectives and killing hunters, who are normally quite challenging... but with 8 people, many of whom are level 1000+, it's like playing on autopilot.”
    • “There were also some times where ragdolls would T-pose in the sky when killed with a grenade, which was actually really funny.”
    • “On a humorous note, my friends keep making fun of me because my trinket bag reads like Andrew Tate's basement closet [spoiler] too many kids' items in the loot table.”
  • emotional9 mentions

    Reviews highlight a mixed emotional impact, with some praising the game's detailed visuals and sound design for creating an immersive atmosphere that evokes strong feelings. However, others criticize the lack of character investment and imaginative storytelling, noting that while there are moments of emotional resonance, they are overshadowed by gameplay issues and uninspired elements. Overall, the game elicits a range of emotional responses, from tears to frustration.

    • “The visuals are detailed and the colors of the environments are expertly fused to really push the emotional impressions that are possible.”
    • “The game's graphical fidelity, combined with its evocative sound design, creates an atmosphere that is both immersive and emotionally resonant.”
    • “The plot was actually decent and had a few emotional tugs.”
  • character development8 mentions

    Character development in the game has been criticized for its lack of depth and engaging storytelling, with many players finding the character designs uninspired and unmemorable. While the environments and combat mechanics are praised, the overall character portrayal and voice acting fall short, detracting from the player's emotional investment in the narrative.

    • “Graphics are competently presented, with achingly beautiful, detail-rich environments, excellent weapon/armor sets, and character designs.”
    • “While the game has its flaws, particularly in character development, the excellent combat system and the rewarding feeling of impacting settlements keep me playing.”
    • “First of all, it's a game from Ubisoft, so the design of the open world map set in Washington (including sub-maps) and the character design itself are excellent.”
    • “Some of the character designs were just… lame to say the least, so it kept me from caring too much about them in the two seconds I saw them.”
    • “My main complaint story-wise is the voice acting and character design.”
    • “Games fun at times even though the story is lame and the character design is terrible (seriously, one of the main characters looks like Dora the Explorer).”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Tom Clancy's The Division 2

Play time

18hMedian play time
79hAverage play time
26hMain story
95hCompletionist
6-60hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 94 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games

Game News