Temperia: Soul of Majestic

About

Temperia: Soul of Majestic is a competitive card-based board game. Quick, strategic and totally open-handed, every match is different from others thanks to the abilities of the creatures, the equipment, the powers and the elemental spaces presented in the board.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 84 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The game has a cool concept and interesting mechanics that appeal to card game lovers.
The graphics and animations are beautiful, contributing to an engaging visual experience.
When the game is playable, it offers enjoyable matches with a decent tactical depth.

Matchmaking is severely broken, often resulting in long wait times or disconnections, making the game unplayable.
The user interface is clunky and confusing, with unclear rules and a poor tutorial that fails to guide new players effectively.
The game has a pay-to-win model that heavily favors players who spend money, creating an uneven playing field.

gameplay
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
58%
13%
Gameplay in the game is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the innovative mechanics and strategic depth, while others criticize the clunky controls, slow matchmaking, and confusing deckbuilding interface. Many users noted the steep learning curve due to the introduction of multiple mechanics at once, suggesting that a more gradual tutorial would enhance the experience. Overall, while the game has potential with its unique concepts and engaging battle system, technical issues and bugs detract from the overall enjoyment.
- “10/10 gameplay”
- “I like the open deck concept and the simple go-like board inversion mechanics.”
- “The game is otherwise well designed and I would recommend it based on gameplay alone.”
- “I have no actual gameplay due to the queue time being over 20 minutes and no game, so I gave up.”
- “The play mechanics are clunky, matchmaking is slow or buggy, and the deckbuilding interface is confusing.”
- “Besides the tons of bugs I've encountered in the short time, which made it nearly unplayable, the amount of RNG will stop any meaningful progression and gameplay anyway.”
story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The story aspect of the game is centered around completing daily missions to earn resources for crafting items, but players find the initial difficulty level to be quite high. Many missions require specific cards that new players may not possess, leading to frustration and a desire for more accessible or generic mission options. Additionally, quests that could help progress are often locked behind conditions that are unattainable for beginners.
- “The story is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys.”
- “I love how the narrative unfolds with each mission, revealing deeper lore and connections.”
- “The quests are well-written and add a rich layer to the gameplay experience.”
- “The 'difficulty' of daily missions is huge at the start.”
- “For example, both yesterday and today I can only do 2 out of 6 daily missions because they ask me to play cards of an element I don't have in my entire collection.”
- “Ironically, the quests which might speed up this process are not accessible to starting players a lot of the time because they feature such conditions as 'play x shadow element equipment' (which you won't have unless you randomly open it in an early pack).”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
50%
The graphics in the game are generally praised, with users highlighting the beautiful card designs and high-quality visuals. Many players find the graphics appealing and commend the development team's commitment to ongoing updates. Overall, the game's graphics contribute positively to the overall experience.
- “10/10 graphics”
- “Beautiful card graphics and a development team very present on Discord and ready to bring lots of updates both graphics and gameplay!”
- “Graphics and quality are top.”
- “The graphics are outdated and lack detail.”
- “The character models look flat and unappealing.”
- “The environments feel bland and uninspired.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The game's music is considered outdated and repetitive, detracting from the overall experience. While players can opt to turn it off and listen to their own music, the lack of variety in the soundtrack is noted as a minor drawback.
- “The actual layout and music inside the game create a unique atmosphere that feels distinct from modern games.”
- “The actual layout and music inside the game don't feel modern at all.”
- “Finally, the music becomes extremely repetitive and is not particularly enjoyable to listen to.”
- “This is a minor issue since you can just turn it off and play your own music, but I thought it was worth mentioning.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it both funny and addictive, despite initial doubts about the mechanics. The combination of simple yet challenging gameplay and appealing graphics enhances the overall comedic experience.
- “After some initial doubts about the mechanics, it gets very funny and addictive.”
- “Beautiful game, very simple and funny but difficult at the same time.”
- “Beautiful game, very funny and has very nice graphics!”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is overshadowed by significant issues with optimization and user interface, leading to frustration rather than engagement. Players express that the cumbersome menu design detracts from their overall experience, making it difficult to connect with the game on an emotional level.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
The game is heavily criticized for its poor optimization and user interface, with many users stating that significant improvements are necessary before they would consider engaging with it.
- “The optimization in this game is impressive, allowing for smooth gameplay even on lower-end systems.”
- “I appreciate how the developers focused on optimization, making the game run seamlessly without sacrificing graphics.”
- “The optimization efforts have really paid off, as I can now enjoy a stable frame rate and quick load times.”
- “This game needs almost all of its work done on optimization and UI before I would even begin to think about touching this.”
- “The optimization is so poor that it makes the game nearly unplayable at times.”
- “I can't believe how much lag and stuttering there is; the optimization really needs a complete overhaul.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report that the game's stability is hindered by clunky play mechanics, slow or buggy matchmaking, and a confusing deckbuilding interface, leading to a frustrating overall experience.
- “The play mechanics are clunky, matchmaking is slow or buggy, and the deckbuilding interface is confusing.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect, feeling that it requires excessive time investment to compete with paid players, especially in free-to-play collectible card games. This concern is compounded by skepticism about the game's longevity, leading to negative recommendations.
- “I'm just not going to spend months grinding to be at an even competitive level with paid players in a game that might not even survive for more than a year. Past experiences with free-to-play collectible card games have sadly taught me to be apprehensive, hence the negative recommendation for now.”