Skip to main content

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

While the single player game falls flat, the multiplayer experience is dynamic and engaging, making it a worthy addition to the Call of Duty franchise.
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Game Cover
56%Game Brain Score
Most mentioned positive aspects:story, gameplay
Most mentioned negative aspects:optimization, stability
56% User Score Based on 5,228 reviews

Platforms

Xbox Series X|SPCPlaystation 5Playstation 4Xbox OneXboxWindowsPlayStation
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Game Cover

About Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with warfare and science fiction themes. It was developed by Sledgehammer Games and was released on November 3, 2014. It received neutral reviews from players.

Includes exclusive Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare limited edition Sentinel Task Force Exoskeleton to transform your avatar into an advanced soldier ready for combat.

Skip Games Like Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Games Like Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Looking for games like Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare? Here are top shooter recommendations with a warfare and science fiction focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with Call of Duty: WWII, Call of Duty® or Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II.

Call of Duty: WWII Image
Games like Call of Duty: WWII
Call of Duty® Image
Games like Call of Duty®
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II Image
Games like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Future Soldier Image
Games like Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Future Soldier
Quake Champions Image
Games like Quake Champions
Gears 5 Image
Games like Gears 5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Image
Games like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Battlefield 2042 ImageBattlefield 2042 ImageBattlefield 2042 Image
Games like Battlefield 2042
Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 Image
Games like Call of Duty: Black Ops 7
Assassin's Creed Unity ImageAssassin's Creed Unity ImageAssassin's Creed Unity Image
Games like Assassin's Creed Unity
Skip User Reviews

Reviews

56%Audience ScoreBased on 5,228 reviews
story367 positive mentions
optimization132 negative mentions

  • story

    994 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    37% positive mentions, 57% neutral mentions, 6% negative mentions

    The story of "Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare" has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its engaging characters and cinematic presentation, particularly praising Kevin Spacey's performance. However, the narrative is often criticized for being predictable, linear, and filled with clichés, leading to a lack of depth and memorable moments. Technical issues, such as unskippable cutscenes and frequent crashes, further detract from the overall experience, making it a hit-or-miss for players seeking a compelling single-player campaign.

    • “I really enjoyed the game; the story is absolutely fantastic.”
    • “The campaign is great, even the story holds well.”
    • “The story is good, the game plays good.”
    • “The campaign's story is very mediocre with gaping plot holes and a nonsensical storyline.”
    • “The story is predictable, very cliché when it comes to FPS stories, but I do like some of the missions.”
    • “The story itself is bland and predictable, there aren't any memorable characters, and it feels like the game is just trying to rush you through the story so you can hurry up and get to the multiplayer.”
  • gameplay

    701 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    41% positive mentions, 52% neutral mentions, 7% negative mentions

    The gameplay of "Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare" has received mixed reviews, with many praising the introduction of exo-suit mechanics that enhance mobility and add a fresh layer to the traditional fast-paced combat. However, players have also noted issues such as lag, unskippable cutscenes, and inconsistent performance, particularly in multiplayer modes, which detract from the overall experience. While some find the gameplay engaging and innovative, others criticize it for being chaotic and reminiscent of previous titles, leading to a divided reception among fans.

    • “From the stunning graphics and engaging storyline to the exhilarating gameplay and customization options, this game is sure to keep players coming back for more.”
    • “The exo suit completely changes the gameplay, making it extremely fast-paced and way more enjoyable than the past Call of Duty games.”
    • “The gameplay is fun and refreshing, with the new movement mechanics adding a breath of fresh air to the Call of Duty franchise.”
    • “Gameplay is a hit or miss during story mode; it could be great or it could be awful, ultimately impacting the overall gameplay horribly, especially during QTEs which happen frequently during the story.”
    • “Unskippable cutscenes, buggy mechanics, and poor AI - ally NPCs constantly block your path, are useless in combat, and move very slowly.”
    • “The gameplay is tedious and boring.”
  • graphics

    635 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    49% positive mentions, 46% neutral mentions, 5% negative mentions

    The graphics in "Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare" are widely praised for their stunning realism and detail, often described as some of the best in the franchise and comparable to modern titles despite being released in 2014. Many players note that the game features impressive character models, environments, and cutscenes, although some experience performance issues and crashes when running at high settings. Overall, while the visuals are a highlight, optimization problems can detract from the experience for those with less powerful hardware.

    • “The graphics are jaw-dropping for such an old game; I mean it's eight years old and looks as good, if not better, than a lot of modern-day games. Plus, the environment is just astonishing.”
    • “The game boasts some of the most realistic and visually stunning graphics in the gaming industry.”
    • “Developed by Sledgehammer Games, this game takes the Call of Duty franchise to the next level with stunning graphics (for its time), the best storyline ever in a COD game, and extremely satisfying gunplay.”
    • “The constant crashing, the lag that stayed no matter what you set your graphics to... this game has been ruined by this port... disappointed...”
    • “I played the game on 1440p resolution with low settings and it still takes a toll on my graphics card, given the graphics and texture in-game looked like a mud puddle.”
    • “The graphics engine is buggy beyond belief, the audio engine carries background noise and routinely repeats with a microsecond delay.”
  • optimization

    332 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    20% positive mentions, 40% neutral mentions, 40% negative mentions

    The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe stuttering, crashes, and performance issues even on high-end rigs. While some users experienced smooth gameplay, the majority noted that the game is poorly optimized for PC, leading to frustration and a lack of recommendation for potential buyers. Overall, the game's technical performance is seen as a significant drawback, overshadowing its otherwise engaging content.

    • “Another thing I praise about this game is how much more amazing the graphics looked compared to its predecessors, and it's so incredibly optimized too.”
    • “Optimized very well (from my experience) I have experienced little frame drops and almost always stay above 50 fps (it usually hovers around 60 - 70) running at 1080p max settings (with the exception of AA and supersampling).”
    • “The game is also well optimized to take advantage of PC hardware, unlike the past few titles in the series.”
    • “The game is horribly optimized for PC and is almost unplayable at times.”
    • “Unplayable due to stuttering.”
    • “This game has so many performance and latency issues that it is frustrating trying to play it.”
  • stability

    115 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    3% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 97% negative mentions

    The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous reports of severe bugs, glitches, and crashes that render it nearly unplayable on various systems. Players have experienced issues such as unskippable cutscenes, freezing during gameplay, and significant frame rate drops, particularly in multiplayer modes. While some patches have improved performance, many users still find the game frustratingly unstable and riddled with technical problems.

    • “The campaign is really good, has decent graphics, and is mostly bug-free.”
    • “Single player runs great, with minimal issues.”
    • “If you want to play a great 1920x1080p version of the game, buy it on PS4; it runs great.”
    • “Game is good but would only get it on sale due to the bugs and glitches.”
    • “Buggy mess that crashes to desktop every half hour.”
    • “When this game came out, it was a buggy piece of junk, and not worth half the amount I paid for it.”
  • replayability

    29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    14% positive mentions, 72% neutral mentions, 14% negative mentions

    Overall, the game's replayability is mixed, with many players noting that the single-player campaign lacks significant replay value due to its linearity and unskippable cutscenes. While some enjoy the multiplayer aspects and customization options, the limited game modes and dwindling player base hinder long-term engagement. Cooperative play offers some replay potential, but many recommend waiting for a sale due to the overall lack of content to justify the full price.

    • “Very much enjoyable, very much replayable, so much fun.”
    • “Replay value - high.”
    • “The reasons why I love this game is the fact that Sledgehammer have listened to the community and what it has been asking for, examples are a fully fleshed out campaign with replayability.”
    • “And the campaign has no replay value.”
    • “Multiplayer is dead now and there isn't much replay value in the campaign.”
    • “The single-player campaign is only seven hours long and does not have much replay value unless you are a die-hard Kevin Spacey fan.”
  • music

    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    20% positive mentions, 68% neutral mentions, 12% negative mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising its integration and ability to enhance the immersive experience, while others criticize it for being poorly implemented, often drowning out important dialogue and ambient sounds. Many players express frustration over the lack of background music during significant segments and the inability to adjust audio settings, leading to a less enjoyable experience. Overall, while the soundtrack has its moments, it often fails to meet the expectations set by previous titles in the series.

    • “The music is also perfectly suited to the game's tone, adding to the overall immersive experience.”
    • “Game is great, campaign is COD standards, which is awesome, gameplay is really fun, soundtrack is amazing, graphics are really good.”
    • “Its soundtrack is also nice, which includes that sci-fi and zombie-like feeling (I'm talking about the Exo Zombies soundtrack).”
    • “The game's cutscenes and music make it worse.”
    • “Too often, there are huge segments of the game without any background music.”
    • “Half of the cutscenes were perfect, others would have the characters' mouths moving but you'd only hear the background piano music and maybe a faint whisper of dialogue.”
  • humor

    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    96% positive mentions, -9% neutral mentions, 13% negative mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with some players finding it genuinely hilarious due to absurd gameplay mechanics and memorable cutscenes, while others criticize it as unintentional comedy stemming from poor design and execution. Many highlight moments of slapstick humor, such as the ridiculousness of character interactions and the game's glitches, but some feel that the overall experience lacks coherence and fails to deliver consistent laughs. Overall, opinions vary widely, with some players enjoying the comedic elements and others deeming them a failure.

    • “Kevin Spacey is the villain (fitting), and what's funny is he breaks your robot arm, and at the end, asks you to pull him up from a ledge... while holding your now useless robot arm.”
    • “Even the flat voice acting becomes hilarious and only adds to the feeling of cheesiness.”
    • “This game is fucking hilarious and you should play it.”
    • “Surely it requires skill to give someone a headshot in milliseconds around the corner, but it is just not funny if you are the guy who receives this headshot.”
    • “The jokes feel forced and often fall flat, making the humor more cringeworthy than entertaining.”
    • “I expected clever wit, but instead, I was met with tired clichés that just didn't land.”
  • monetization

    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    17% positive mentions, 27% neutral mentions, 56% negative mentions

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for its misleading advertising and aggressive microtransactions, which many players feel detract from the overall experience. Users report that the game often prioritizes profit over gameplay, with additional costs for content that should be included in the base price, leading to frustration and a sense of being exploited. While some appreciate the personalization options available through in-game purchases, the overwhelming sentiment is that the monetization model feels deceptive and detrimental to the game's integrity.

    • “Liked some personalizations (in-game purchases).”
    • “If you buy a season pass, just like in other games, the additional microtransactions aren't included, which left me incredulous, so I don't like that.”
    • “Broken at launch, microtransactions killed the game; later updates fixed the game.”
    • “The game was also a money-grabber that would have you spend hundreds of dollars on microtransactions rather than actually playing the game to get better gear.”
    • “But don't wander like a blind fly into their twisted web of deception; in doing so, you'd only fall short as a victim of modern-day internet microtransactions.”
    • “If you buy a season pass, just like in previous titles, the additional microtransactions aren't included, which left me incredulous.”
  • grinding

    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    6% positive mentions, 6% neutral mentions, 88% negative mentions

    Reviews highlight that grinding in the game is often perceived as tedious and frustrating, with players feeling compelled to invest excessive time for minimal rewards. Many express dissatisfaction with the repetitive nature of missions and challenges, which detracts from the overall enjoyment, while a few find value in the competitive aspects that encourage gear grinding. Overall, the grinding experience is described as a chore rather than an engaging part of gameplay.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “I apparently played for 11 hours, at least 2 of those were the game paused and played on hardened difficulty; the only thing hard about it was actually forcing yourself to play another tedious mission.”
    • “I would rather just watch a cinematic unfold than do tedious button mashing that's supposed to immerse me into something I really have no meaningful interaction with in reality.”
    • “Some dislike how you must go through challenges to unlock the red dot sight, etc., for each weapon instead of purchasing them as in previous titles; I spent six teeth-grinding hours trying to get 40 headshots with a sniper rifle, having a miserable time and constantly doing poorly and letting my team down.”
  • emotional

    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The emotional aspect of the game is mixed; while it has the potential for a compelling narrative centered on a surrogate son amidst war and corporate power, the focus on side characters detracts from building a strong emotional connection. Players report feeling a range of emotions, from sadness during cutscenes to excitement from gameplay mechanics, but overall, the emotional impact is inconsistent and often overshadowed by technical issues and gameplay distractions.

    • “Between the potentially emotional bond of a surrogate son and the backdrop of war, government inefficiency, and rising corporate power; the game had the potential to tell a pretty great tale.”
    • “This game does get me emotional but not in a mad, screaming at people kind of way, but a sad way.”
    • “It's both graphically and emotionally enticing.”
  • atmosphere

    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    40% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 60% negative mentions

    The atmosphere of the game receives mixed reviews; while some players praise its visually pleasing graphics and immersive experience, others feel that it lacks the engaging atmosphere found in previous titles. Additionally, concerns about the lag compensation system contribute to a negative perception of the game's overall ambiance. Overall, the atmosphere is highlighted as a strong point by some, while others find it lacking.

    • “I only played this game for the campaign, and I have to say that throughout all the future phases of Call of Duty, this one in particular is more visually pleasing with the graphics and atmosphere.”
    • “Amazing game atmosphere and the best FPS game mechanics I have seen before.”
    • “I liked the previous games in the series, but there is no atmosphere in the new game.”
    • “Lag compensation system creates a cheater-like atmosphere.”
    • “Atmosphere - okay”
  • character development

    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    67% positive mentions, -67% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions

    Character development in the game is generally viewed as strong, with an engaging story plot that captivates players. However, some reviewers note that certain character arcs feel predictable and lack depth, with minimal growth beyond initial conflicts. Overall, while the visuals enhance the experience, the character development may not fully meet the expectations set by the narrative.

    • “Good character development and an amazing story plot.”
    • “Strong character development and stunning visuals allow the player to control a game on par with a summer action blockbuster.”
    • “There’s one turn you see coming from a mile away, and no other character development really happens except for two characters mildly disagreeing with each other at the beginning of a mission and then liking each other at the end.”
    • “The characters feel flat and their arcs are predictable, making it hard to invest in their journeys.”
    • “I expected more depth, but the character development is minimal and lacks any real impact on the story.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Some of these are affiliate links — if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Play Times

9h Median play time
84h Average play time
7-49h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 43 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a shooter game with warfare and science fiction themes. Common tags for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare include first-person, linear, war, america, science and others.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4 and others.

On average players spend around 84 hours playing Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare was released on November 3, 2014.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare was developed by Sledgehammer Games.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare for its story but disliked it for its optimization.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Call of Duty: WWII, Call of Duty®, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Future Soldier, Quake Champions and others.