SimpleRockets

About

SimpleRockets is a physics-based space simulation game that lets you build and launch your own rockets. With a variety of parts to choose from, you can create rockets, rovers, and even space stations. Challenges and realistic orbital physics teach players about rocket science while they explore the solar system and share their creations.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 201 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

graphics4 negative mentions

Fun and easy to get into, making it a great introduction to rocket building and space mechanics.
Offers a simple yet engaging gameplay experience, ideal for casual players and those on a budget.
Good educational value, teaching basic rocket science and physics in an accessible way.

Lacks depth and content compared to more complex games like Kerbal Space Program, leading to potential boredom after a short time.
Experiences frequent bugs and crashes, particularly in sandbox mode, which can hinder gameplay.
Limited building mechanics, such as only having one connection point for rocket parts, making complex designs difficult.

gameplay
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
54%
23%
The gameplay is characterized by its focus on realistic orbital mechanics and a straightforward approach, making it accessible for players interested in space exploration. While some users find it challenging and engaging, others describe it as mediocre, with limitations in connecting parts affecting the overall experience. Overall, it offers a blend of educational value and addictive fun, particularly for those keen on understanding the principles of space travel.
- “This is the perfect genre for an uncomplicated, focused core gameplay to shine.”
- “The graphics are wonderfully done, and the gameplay is challenging while adhering to Newtonian physics.”
- “Awesome and addicting game that will get you looking up how orbital mechanics actually work...all in the name of landing on the moon.”
- “The only thing that affects the gameplay is that you can't connect parts in multiple places.”
- “The gameplay is meh.”
- “Gameplay: 5/10”
graphics
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
30%
40%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players criticizing them as simplistic or poorly executed, while others appreciate their charm and how they complement the gameplay. Despite a few negative comments highlighting the low quality and lack of fitting aesthetics, several users find the graphics enjoyable and fitting for the game's mechanics. Overall, opinions range from "terrible" to "wonderfully done," indicating a polarized reception.
- “The graphics are wonderfully done, and the gameplay is challenging while adhering to Newtonian physics.”
- “As far as it goes, you can build rockets, probes, and rovers, and basically send them wherever you want - oh, and the graphics are just plain awesome.”
- “Simple graphics but fun.”
- “The graphics are terrible.”
- “The models look ugly and don't fit the theme at all; it's like some weird plastic steampunk graphics.”
- “It is a waste of money because the graphics are horrible, and previews may make it look cool, but it is a piece of trash, no offense.”
story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
44%
33%
The game's story aspect is minimal, primarily serving as a framework for its physics-based challenges rather than a narrative-driven experience. While it includes several missions that function as tutorials, the lack of a career mode or engaging environments can lead to a sense of monotony once the missions are completed. Overall, the focus is more on sandbox gameplay and challenges than on a compelling storyline.
- “The learning curve is smooth and simple, thanks in part to a good tutorial and progressive challenge missions to master, before jumping into the sandbox and designing one's own from scratch.”
- “The game has several missions, but it is mostly designed for its sandbox mode.”
- “There's no career mode, no true 'free flight' although every mission is a free flight because there's no hard 'game over' unless death, and so on.”
- “The planets and moons are basically featureless, which detracts a little from the thrill of completing a mission.”
- “It does come with some missions, but they are mostly for training and orientation.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by its amusing planet names and the comedic chaos that ensues during rocket-building, leading to entertaining malfunctions and explosions. Players find it to be a fun and lighthearted experience, combining science with laughter.
- “It's a fun game that teaches you a little science and has some pretty funny names for the planets.”
- “The learning curve seems a bit steep, but this game is a hoot for just sandboxing around in, building rockets, and then laughing maniacally when they malfunction and explode!”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The game offers significant replayability for some players, while others find it enjoyable initially but lacking in long-term engagement, with only about two hours of fun before it loses its appeal.
- “The game offers a tremendous amount of replayability, with different choices leading to unique outcomes.”
- “I love how each playthrough feels fresh and engaging, thanks to the various paths and endings available.”
- “The replayability factor is off the charts, making it easy to dive back in and experience new content every time.”
- “Fun at first but only lasts about 2 hours; there's not much replayability at all.”
- “Once you complete the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of varied content makes replaying feel tedious and uninteresting.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game tends to become repetitive and annoying for some players, leading them to turn it off in favor of their own playlists.
- “The music gets a little annoying after a while; I just turn it off and put on my own music.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game has been widely criticized for its instability, with users reporting numerous bugs that significantly impact gameplay.
- “The game is incredibly buggy and crashes frequently.”
- “I experienced constant instability, with frequent freezes and glitches.”
- “The overall stability is poor, making it hard to enjoy the gameplay.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The atmosphere of the game is perceived as limited and lacking the vibrant, dynamic feel typically associated with similar titles, such as Kerbal Space Program (KSP). Players note the constraints of a 2D-only design and a restricted selection of parts, which contribute to a less engaging experience. Overall, the atmosphere is described as subdued, focusing primarily on miscellaneous challenges and a sandbox mode.
- “The game feels very limited in its atmosphere, lacking the vibrant and dynamic elements I expect from a space simulation.”
- “With only a handful of parts to choose from, the atmosphere feels stale and uninspired compared to what I am used to in other games.”
- “The 2D-only design detracts from the immersive experience, making the atmosphere feel flat and unengaging.”