SimpleRockets 2

The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and variety, with many players finding the career mode missions repetitive and frustrating. While some missions offer engaging challenges, the overall progression feels limited, often requiring players to grind through mundane tasks before unlocking more interesting content. Additionally, the absence of a cohesive narrative or meaningful context for missions detracts from the immersive experience, leaving players desiring more substantial story elements and mission diversity.

The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising its depth and mechanics, particularly in the context of rocket design and orbital mechanics, likening it to Kerbal Space Program (KSP) but with a more approachable learning curve. While the career mode adds complexity and realism, some players find the building mechanics cumbersome and the overall presentation lacking charm. Despite these criticisms, the game is noted for its smooth controls, customization options, and potential for creativity, making it a solid choice for both newcomers and seasoned players interested in aerospace simulation.

Overall, the optimization of "Juno: New Origins" is highly praised, with many users noting its smooth performance even on lower-end devices and the ability to handle complex builds without significant lag. The game features real-time performance metrics that enhance the design process, and its procedural engine customization allows for detailed optimization. While some players experienced performance issues with intricate designs, the general consensus is that it offers superior optimization compared to similar titles like "Kerbal Space Program."

Overall, the game's stability is a mixed bag, with many users noting that while it has significant bugs and glitches, especially in physics and the user interface, it runs relatively well on lower-end systems. Some players report a smoother experience with fewer crashes compared to previous titles, but others express frustration with persistent issues that detract from gameplay. As the game is in early access, many hope for improvements in future updates, acknowledging the potential for a more polished experience.

The atmosphere in the game is a mixed bag, with players appreciating the realistic physics and visual effects, such as atmospheric scattering and re-entry heating, which enhance the engineering experience. However, some users find the atmospheric mechanics less satisfying compared to similar games, noting issues like limited time warp and a lack of detailed information on atmospheric parameters. Overall, while the game offers a solid foundation for atmospheric exploration and customization, it leaves room for improvement in depth and clarity.

The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it calming and well-suited to the game's atmosphere, while others criticize it for being repetitive and lacking variety, often describing it as bland or forgettable. Many users noted that the soundtrack consists of only a few tracks, which can lead to a feeling of dryness and a desire for more engaging music. Overall, while the ambient soundscapes can enhance the experience, they often fail to leave a lasting impression.

The humor in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting a stark contrast to the charm and comedic elements found in similar titles like Kerbal Space Program (KSP). Critics argue that the game lacks personality and fails to deliver engaging humor, often feeling more like a serious engineering simulator than an entertaining adventure. While some players find moments of humor, the overall consensus is that the absence of quirky characters and witty writing diminishes the game's comedic appeal.

The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being tedious and repetitive, with players expressing frustration over the steep progression curve and the need to complete monotonous missions to unlock content. While some find satisfaction in the crafting process, many feel that the grind detracts from the overall enjoyment, making it feel more like a chore than a rewarding experience. The contract system offers some relief, but the general sentiment is that the game could benefit from a more generous approach to tech point rewards to alleviate the grind.

The emotional aspect of the game is mixed; while some players feel a sense of achievement and engagement from the engineering challenges, others find the lack of humor, charm, and immersive elements limits emotional connection. The game is perceived more as an industrial simulation than a traditional game, which may hinder deeper emotional investment, despite its potential for growth. Overall, players express a desire for more emotional depth to enhance their experience.

The monetization of Juno: New Origins has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users feeling it is poorly positioned as a serious PC game despite its mobile origins. While some appreciate its value compared to typical mobile apps, the overall sentiment suggests it primarily seeks to exploit the popularity of similar titles like Kerbal Space Program.

Users emphasize the importance of design freedom and the ability to replay tutorials for enhancing replayability. While custom pre-made parts can improve narrative, the overall experience benefits from greater flexibility and opportunities for experimentation.