Satisfactory Modeler
- September 17, 2024
- David Price
Get on SteamModel your Satisfactory builds. Set up your machines however you like, adding optional limits to the number of any of those machines and the tool will calculate how the parts will flow and how many of each machine type are getting used. This does advanced calculations that no other Satisfactory planning tool can do, including figuring out how splitters and mergers will split and merge and eve…
Mac OS
PC
Windows
Cloud
Linux
Reviews
- Incredibly useful for planning factories, allowing for detailed control over inputs and outputs.
- User-friendly interface that simplifies complex calculations and factory layouts, making it a must-have for Satisfactory players.
- Active development and regular updates enhance functionality, with features like outposts and alternate recipes that improve the planning experience.
- Can be slow and unresponsive when handling larger factory layouts, leading to long calculation times.
- Some users report bugs and inconsistencies, such as incorrect output values and issues with the interface.
- Lacks certain features like power consumption tracking and the ability to easily manage large numbers of connections, which can hinder usability.
- stability4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Overall, users find the app to be a promising tool for factory building, but it suffers from notable bugs and UI glitches that hinder its stability. Despite these issues, many recommend it for its functionality, especially for load balancing, and appreciate the developer's active efforts to address the problems.
“Great idea but unfortunately still too buggy to be recommended.”
“Little buggy but the dev is very active about fixing things.”
“Even though there are some UI glitches, I still recommend this since the software is still a helpful tool in building small to big factories.”
- optimization3 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- -67 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Overall, users find the software to be excellent in functionality but criticize its optimization, noting issues with performance, user interface, and slow recalculations for longer production lines. There is a desire for improvements in optimization, with some suggesting that open-source development could enhance performance.
“The software itself is awesome, and I found it to be the best production planner for Satisfactory. However, it is not very optimized, and for longer production lines, recalculating takes a lot of time.”
“Very nice, but it would be even better if it were open source and a little more optimized.”
“Bad performance, bad UI, not very optimized yet.”
“The software itself is awesome and I found it to be the best production planner for Satisfactory; however, it is not very optimized, and for longer production lines, recalculating takes a lot of time.”
“Very nice, would be nicer if it was open source and a little more optimized though.”
- graphics1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The graphics are described as functional, striking a balance by providing just enough visual detail to serve their purpose without being overly elaborate.
“The graphics are stunning, bringing the game world to life with incredible detail.”
“The vibrant colors and smooth animations create an immersive visual experience.”
“The art style is unique and beautifully crafted, making every scene a visual delight.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The monetization model is praised for its absence of ads, indicating a user-friendly approach that enhances the overall gaming experience.
“Finally, a game that respects my time with no ads!”
“I love that I can enjoy the game without being bombarded by advertisements.”
“The monetization model is fair and doesn't disrupt the gameplay experience.”
