Sacraboar
- November 6, 2009
- Makivision Games
Sacraboar is an RTS game in which players have to capture their opponent's boar trophy. Featuring an intuitive and easy to use resource management system, the game offers fast-paced game play without lengthy and tedious construction phases. During the game players can build towers, which either give them access to powerful spells or increase their budgets for producing units. Get yourself some a…
Reviews
Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews
gameplay3 positive mentions
optimization1 negative mentions
- The game features some neat mechanics, such as a spell system that adds variety to gameplay.
- It can be a fun experience for local multiplayer or LAN parties, especially with friends.
- Some players find it to have a unique twist on the RTS genre with its capture the flag concept.
- The game is poorly optimized, with frequent crashes and a frustrating main menu design.
- It lacks depth, with limited unit types and strategies, making gameplay feel repetitive.
- Many players find it outdated and not worth the time or money, especially compared to other RTS games.
- gameplay1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The gameplay features several innovative mechanics that add a fresh twist to the RTS genre, providing players with enjoyable experiences for a limited time.
“This game introduces a few new mechanics that add a fresh twist to the RTS genre, making it enjoyable for a while.”
“The gameplay is engaging and offers a variety of strategies to explore, keeping players invested.”
“I love how the mechanics encourage creative problem-solving and make each match feel unique.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has been criticized as lacking, with users describing it as boring and poorly executed, offering little in terms of innovation.
“Boring, poorly optimized, and nothing new.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative