Robotex

About

Robotex is a single player casual platformer game. It was developed by YFYX GAMES and was released on November 19, 2014. It received negative reviews from players.

Life on Earth is unsustainable. Humanity must seek a new home but the only planet found is very hostile. You were sent on a expedition to slay the monsters inhabiting the surface of this planet. In this adventure you end up being the villain. Game contains two basic controls, many puzzles and lots of guns and enemies.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

40%

Audience ScoreBased on 429 reviews

graphics13 positive mentions

gameplay19 negative mentions

Unique concept blending side-scrolling platformer with shooting and puzzle elements, offering an old-school arcade vibe.
Variety of weapons and creative monster designs add strategic depth and experimentation to combat.
Challenging gameplay with high difficulty provides an addictive experience for players who enjoy mastering tough mechanics.

Controls are clunky, unresponsive, and poorly optimized, making precise movement and aiming frustrating and often unfair.
Visuals and UI are inconsistent and confusing, with many elements blending into backgrounds and unclear menus lacking explanations or tutorials.
The game suffers from repetitive gameplay, technical issues, poor level design, and feels like an unpolished mobile port with little content depth.

gameplay
52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
53%
37%
Gameplay in this indie 2D platformer blends shooting, platforming, and light puzzles with simple controls and short loops, but many players find the mechanics clunky, repetitive, and poorly executed—especially criticizing unrefined controls and an awkward auto-move system. While some appreciate its colorful visuals and occasional satisfying sequences, most reviews highlight frustrating gameplay, lack of depth, and a sense of it feeling like an incomplete or poorly ported mobile game.
- “Positioned as a small independent project, the game attempts to combine classic 2D platforming with shooting mechanics and light environmental puzzle elements.”
- “Combat is integrated directly into the platforming mechanics, meaning players must often defeat enemies while simultaneously managing precise movement and timing.”
- “While the puzzle mechanics are not particularly complex, they provide variety and prevent the gameplay from becoming entirely repetitive.”
- “Gameplay is really lackluster, similar to Flappy Bird. The art style is nice, though, but for a game like this there should be more focus put on decent controls to provide a better experience.”
- “The controls are equally disappointing, with a confusing auto-move system and clunky jetpack and rocket mechanics.”
- “Lousy mess of a poorly ported mobile game with clunky controls, confusing visual clutter, and unfair design made only to artificially prolong the gameplay instead of making an actually challenging game.”
graphics
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
63%
10%
The graphics in Robotex are characterized by a bright, colorful, and simple 2D art style that some find charming and effective, especially in backgrounds and environments. However, many reviews criticize the visuals as low-resolution, blurry, inconsistent, and unpolished, with some noting that the graphics feel unfinished or more suited to mobile than PC. While the art style has appeal, technical shortcomings and a lack of graphical options diminish the overall visual experience.
- “Visually, Robotex adopts a bright and colorful 2D art style that reflects its indie origins.”
- “While the graphics are not highly detailed or technically advanced, the clear visual presentation ensures that players can easily read the layout of each level and react quickly to incoming threats.”
- “The sci-fi setting is well realized despite the simple graphics.”
- “A mobile infinite runner featuring poor controls, blurry graphics, low resolution, cheap sound effects, no music, terrible UI, and the list could go on.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- “The menu reminds me of an FTP app and the graphics only make it worse (they are really terrible)... the only thing I like about this game are the backgrounds/artworks!”
story
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
68%
19%
The story is generally simple and minimalistic, often lacking detailed narrative elements such as text or voice acting, relying instead on subtle cutscenes or implied themes. Some users find the plot engaging with dark or morally complex twists, while others feel the absence of explicit storytelling limits depth and clarity. Overall, the story serves as a basic backdrop rather than a central focus, requiring players to interpret and piece together the narrative themselves.
- “The story premise is simple but the execution is solid.”
- “Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “No story, since there are no words, voice acting, or major cutscenes aside from a crappy introduction cutscene that does nothing aside from showing stock images of man-made disasters on earth.”
- “The story is presented in the form of cutscene-style video, but as there is no text or voices to the story, it's up to you to figure out what's actually happening.”
- “The plot twist where you realize you are the villain?”
music
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
54%
23%
The music in the game is a mix of simple, upbeat electronic tracks that suit its sci-fi arcade style, but opinions vary widely—some find it energetic and fitting, while others criticize it as annoying or completely absent. Sound effects are generally noted, but the absence or low quality of music in certain versions detracts from the overall audio experience.
- “The audio design complements the arcade-style gameplay with energetic sound effects and straightforward background music.”
- “The soundtrack features simple electronic and upbeat tracks that match the game’s science-fiction setting and maintain momentum as players move through the stages.”
- “Its awesome, I love the graphics and the soundtracks.”
- “A mobile infinite runner featuring poor controls, blurry graphics, low resolution, cheap sound effects, no music, terrible UI, and the list could go on.”
- “This unresponsive and clunky game is an expensive version of Jetpack Joyride with annoying music and boring gameplay.”
- “The Mac client is terrible, there are no settings to even turn down the terrible, blaring music, and you can't even alt-tab.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The game's replayability is mixed, with some users appreciating its difficulty and variety of modes, skins, and weapons as a potential incentive to replay. However, many feel these features are insufficient to significantly enhance long-term engagement or redeem the overall experience. There is promise in the content, but current replay value is limited.
- “Short game but very replayable because of the difficulty.”
- “There are 2 modes: classic and turbo (turbo is more playable).”
- “The amount of visual content, weapon/skin variety, and such show promise of the developers' ambition and might serve as a stepping stone to something better and more playable, should they learn from the critics.”
- “I would have suggested putting them, along with the skins, as unlockables for the replay value but judging by the overall experience, these features can't redeem the game enough to get a positive review.”
- “The amount of visual content, weapon/skin variety and such does show promise of the developers' ambition and might serve as a stepping stone to something better and more playable, should they learn from the critics.”
- “No value or replayability at all.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization approach is widely criticized as unethical and exploitative, relying on reselling premade templates and asset-flipped content as cheap cash grabs or shovelware. Users view it as a pattern of low-effort releases aimed at making quick money rather than delivering genuine value.
- “Trying to get paid for someone else's game templates and assets; at best, this is shovelware, at worst, it's a scam or cash grab.”
- “My Way Games/A Nostru have shown a repeated pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab through this account or closely linked alternate accounts.”
- “These developers do nothing but copy premade game templates and tutorials, create basic levels using construction kit templates, slap on asset-flipped sprites and assets, then dump them on Steam and into cheap shovelware bundles as cash grabs.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
User reviews on stability are mixed, with some praising the game for being glitch-free, while others highlight frequent bugs and frustrating glitches that affect gameplay. Overall, stability appears inconsistent across experiences.
- “Very good game in my opinion: lots of great gameplay and no glitches at all.”
- “I do not recommend this game; it is poorly made and full of glitches.”
- “Apart from being too simple, it is quite buggy.”
- “There are some glitches where your robot may get stuck in certain places without dying and without the opportunity to get out by itself.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The atmosphere is consistently immersive, effectively conveying a creepy, lonely, and oppressive tone on the hostile planet, supported by basic but fitting audio elements.
- “Although the audio elements remain relatively basic, they support the overall tone of the experience and help maintain a consistent atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere on the hostile planet is creepy.”
- “The atmosphere is lonely and oppressive.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is generally considered tedious and unenjoyable, with repetitive zones that lack excitement. However, it remains a practical method for effective card-farming.
- “The game is divided into three zones, but all are tedious, unfun, and poorly designed.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from poor optimization, with sluggish controls that significantly detract from the experience. Overall, it is not well-optimized for PC, especially considering its price.
- “The controls are sluggish and not optimized, which basically kills the experience.”
- “Conclusion: this game is not optimized for PC, and for the price of the game, it has nearly nothing to offer!”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is seen as quirky and somewhat unpolished, with some users finding it amusing in an offbeat or ironic way. However, it may come across as more appropriate for a utility app than a traditional game.
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development in the game features stylized designs with bold colors and simple shapes, enhancing visual clarity and making characters and enemies easily distinguishable during fast-paced gameplay.
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game elicited a strong emotional response, deeply moving players to the point of tears.
- “It made me cry”