Revolution: Virtual Playspace
- October 5, 2016
- Dragom
- 2h median play time
"Revolution: Virtual Playspace" is a physics-based puzzle game that challenges players to construct creative machines in a virtual world. Manipulate a variety of objects and tools to solve increasingly complex levels, or design and share your own unique designs in the game's sandbox mode. With a focus on open-ended experimentation and player creativity, "Revolution: Virtual Playspace" offers a unique and engaging spin on the puzzle genre.
Reviews
- The map creation feature is fantastic and allows for extensive customization, making it a great tool for tabletop RPGs.
- The game has a lot of potential with a wealth of assets and models, providing a unique experience for users.
- It is relatively easy to learn the mapping part, and users have enjoyed creating scenarios for their games.
- The user interface is dense, slow, and unintuitive, making the game frustrating to use.
- There are significant issues with camera controls and a lack of hotkeys, which complicates the editing process.
- The game requires an online connection to play, which limits accessibility and has led to complaints about its current state.
- music6 mentions
- 17 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The music in the game has been widely criticized for being generic and distracting, detracting significantly from the overall experience. Many players find it infuriatingly bland, leading to a strong desire to mute it or abandon the game altogether. Despite the involvement of a musically talented individual, the soundtrack fails to impress and has left users feeling disappointed.
“I am shocked that one guy, and his musically talented friend, managed to create this.”
“There is no way to turn off the horribly generic music, which is a huge distraction from anything good this poorly designed game wants to do.”
“The music is so infuriatingly bland that you immediately want to close the game and ask for your money back.”
“I am shocked that one guy and his musically talented friend managed to create this.”
- grinding4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, particularly in multiplayer options that demand a certain level of technical knowledge. The lack of user interface and quality of life improvements is noted as a significant detractor, impacting the overall experience and potential of the game.
“Multiplayer options are tedious and require some amount of tech knowledge.”
“And to the developers, I know UI and QoL development is the most tedious and boring part of development, but it really does make the difference between a classic and a steaming pile, and that goes double when developing a creation tool.”
- gameplay4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been criticized for its frustrating controls and mechanics, with many users expressing a need for a significant overhaul of the control scheme and user interface to improve the overall experience.
“I would require several hours to get over these stupid controls and mechanics.”
“Needs a massive controls, UI, and gameplay revamp.”
- optimization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has been widely criticized, with players expressing frustration over the requirement to be online to play, as well as the need for enhancements in the map editor and additional key bindings. Overall, the game's performance and user experience are seen as lacking.
“The optimization is terrible; having to be online in order to play isn't ideal. The map editor could use improvements, and there should be more key bindings.”
“The optimization is terrible; having to be online in order to play isn't ideal. The map editor could use improvements, and there should be more key bindings.”
- graphics2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
The graphics receive mixed reviews, with users noting that while the 2D models are underwhelming, the 3D models are decent and maintain a good appearance even at the lowest graphical settings.
“The 2D models don't look too great in my opinion, while the 3D ones are decent, even on the lowest graphical settings.”
“The graphics feel outdated and lack the polish expected from modern games.”
“The overall visual presentation is underwhelming, with textures that appear blurry and poorly defined.”