Revolution: Virtual Playspace
- October 5, 2016
- Dragom
- 2h median play time
"Revolution: Virtual Playspace" is a physics-based puzzle game that challenges players to construct creative machines in a virtual world. Manipulate a variety of objects and tools to solve increasingly complex levels, or design and share your own unique designs in the game's sandbox mode. With a focus on open-ended experimentation and player creativity, "Revolution: Virtual Playspace" offers a unique and engaging spin on the puzzle genre.
Reviews
- The map creation feature is fantastic and allows for extensive customization, making it a great tool for tabletop RPGs.
- The game has a lot of potential with a wealth of assets and models, providing a unique experience for users.
- Once learned, the program can be enjoyable and offers a creative outlet for building scenarios and worlds.
- The user interface is dense, slow, and unintuitive, making it frustrating to navigate and use effectively.
- The game requires an online connection to play, which limits accessibility and can be a significant drawback.
- There is a lack of community support and updates, leading to concerns about the game's long-term viability and usability.
- music3 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- -33 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The music in the game has been widely criticized for being generic and distracting, detracting significantly from the overall experience. Many players find it infuriatingly bland, leading to a strong desire to stop playing and seek refunds. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a major flaw in an already poorly designed game.
“I am shocked that one guy, and his musically talented friend, managed to create this.”
“There is no way to turn off the horribly generic music, which is a huge distraction from anything good this poorly designed game wants to do.”
“The music is so infuriatingly bland that you immediately want to close the game and ask for your money back.”
“I am shocked that one person, along with his musically talented friend, managed to create this.”
- grinding2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious, particularly in multiplayer options that demand technical knowledge. The lack of user-friendly interface and quality of life improvements detracts from the overall experience, highlighting the importance of these elements in game development.
“Multiplayer options are tedious and require some amount of tech knowledge.”
“I know UI and QoL development is the most tedious and boring part of development, but it really does make the difference between a classic and a steaming pile, especially when developing a creation tool.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been criticized for its frustrating controls and mechanics, with many users expressing a need for significant improvements to the user interface and overall gameplay experience.
“I would require several hours to get over these stupid controls and mechanics.”
“Needs a massive controls, UI, and gameplay revamp.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has been criticized for being poor, with mandatory online connectivity being a significant drawback. Additionally, users feel that the map editor requires enhancements and that the game would benefit from more customizable key bindings.
“The optimization is terrible; having to be online in order to play isn't ideal. The map editor could use improvements, and it could benefit from more key bindings.”
“The game's optimization is lacking, making it frustrating to play. The requirement for an online connection is inconvenient, and the map editor needs significant enhancements.”
“Poor optimization really hampers the experience. Being forced to stay online to play is not user-friendly, and the map editor feels underdeveloped with limited key binding options.”
- graphics1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The graphics received mixed reviews, with users noting that while the 2D models are underwhelming, the 3D models are visually appealing, even at the lowest graphical settings.
“The 2D models don't look too great in my opinion, but the 3D ones are decent, even on the lowest graphical settings.”
“The graphics feel outdated and lack the detail expected from modern games.”
“The environments are bland and lack the vibrancy that would make them more engaging.”