Resilience Wave Survival
- December 23, 2015
- Jimbob Games
"Resilience: Wave Survival" is a physics-based shooter where you defend against alien invaders, zombies, and robots in an abandoned village. Game modes include Wave, Gun Game, Dead in 5, and Survival, with features like weather, day/night cycle, crafting, and customizable weapons. Explore to scavenge for supplies, upgrade player abilities, and engage in various challenges with high scores and achievements.
Reviews
- The game offers a fun wave survival experience with a variety of enemies and weapons, making it enjoyable for short-term entertainment.
- The developer is active and responsive, frequently updating the game and adding new content, which shows commitment to improvement.
- The graphics and environment have improved significantly in the latest version, providing a visually appealing experience for players.
- The game suffers from numerous bugs, crashes, and performance issues, making it frustrating to play for many users.
- Many features and game modes are broken or unplayable, leading to a lack of content and variety in gameplay.
- The AI is poorly designed, often resulting in unbalanced gameplay where enemies can become overly difficult or unresponsive.
- graphics18 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 17 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the style and overall quality, particularly in the latest version, while others criticize the initial settings and performance issues, such as long loading times and glitches. Users have reported difficulties with default graphic settings and compatibility, leading to frustration, but some have found the visuals appealing once properly configured. Overall, the graphics are seen as a strong point by some, but significant issues remain for others.
“Graphics 5/5”
“I love the graphics style and the gameplay is pretty challenging too.”
“Keep in mind I think it's only one developer, but don't let that discourage you; this is not one of those half-assed early access nightmares. The graphics in RWS 2.0 in the forest map are very impressive.”
“The environment graphics are very fuzzy; even playing with settings, I can't get them looking normal.”
“Utter garbage, unbalanced graphics, some things load for absurdly long times, prone to crashing.”
“Developer indicates the minimum requirement as 'shader model 3.0 graphic card' and 2GB of RAM, but it does not even get to the main menu in a 4.1 graphic card (GT240M) and 4GB RAM.”
- stability10 mentions
- 30 % positive mentions
- -20 % neutral mentions
- 90 % negative mentions
The game's stability has received largely negative feedback, with users reporting numerous bugs, graphical glitches, and AI issues that hinder gameplay. While some players noted a smooth experience with consistent frame rates, many others experienced crashes and significant performance problems, leading to disappointment and requests for refunds. Overall, the game is considered unoptimized and incomplete, requiring further development to address these stability concerns.
“I know it's not perfect, but it has a lot going for it. There are no glitches, and it plays nice and smooth with a very consistent frame rate and no drops.”
“The game runs incredibly stable, providing a seamless experience without any noticeable lag or interruptions.”
“I've experienced zero crashes since I started playing, which really enhances the overall enjoyment of the game.”
“This game by far is more buggy than the Disney movie Ant.”
“What is even worse about this is that the boss glitches through all placed objects (minus buildings), so if you try to hide behind a tree, it just passes through it and hits you anyways.”
“Disappointment is all I could say about this download, I would be grateful for a refund, this entire game doesn't even work, it's buggy and crashes instantly.”
- gameplay8 mentions
- 38 % positive mentions
- 38 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The gameplay is characterized by fun arcade elements and a casual approach, making it enjoyable despite its simplicity. The survival mode shows promise with effective mechanics and crafting systems, though it is still in early development. Overall, players appreciate the graphics and challenge, while expressing optimism for future updates to enhance the experience.
“The survival mode, although in early stages, is amazingly efficient. The progression system, survival mechanics, and crafting are all there.”
“I love the graphics style, and the gameplay is pretty challenging too.”
“That is because what it lacks in overall progression it makes up for in casual gameplay.”
“Fairly simple gameplay, but has a lot of potential with future updates that are sure to come!”
- optimization7 mentions
- 29 % positive mentions
- 29 % neutral mentions
- 43 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's optimization has received negative feedback, with users reporting bugs and performance issues, particularly struggling to achieve stable frame rates even on mid-high settings with decent hardware. While some appreciate the game's value and the developer's commitment, many feel that the performance does not meet expectations for a title of its simplicity.
“And the developer is really committed to their work; it has some bugs, yes, it's unoptimized, but it's cool.”
“Poorly optimized, I struggled to get 60fps on mid-high settings with a GTX 1080.”
“For one thing, the performance should be much better for a game this simple.”
“Now I will only complain about the game's performance.”
- atmosphere3 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The atmosphere of the game is generally praised for being immersive and engaging, with solid weapon sounds enhancing the experience. However, some users feel that the promotional screenshots do not adequately showcase the game's diverse models and atmospheric elements.
“The weapon sounds are solid, and the atmosphere is pretty cool most of the time.”
“The player can select various variables for the maps, including atmospheric shader types.”
- humor2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is appreciated by some players, particularly for its comedic moments like slow-motion antics, but it may not resonate with those who have higher standards or a less developed sense of humor. Overall, it seems to appeal to a specific audience that enjoys lighthearted, slapstick elements.
“If you were to get this game, then I would recommend you buy it when it's on sale, but if you have higher standards and don't have a good sense of humor, then maybe the game isn't for you.”
“It's pretty funny to see things go flying in slow motion.”
- story2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's title reflects both its narrative and the developer's journey, offering a light-hearted experience that is enjoyable without requiring a deep commitment to the story. It serves as an ideal choice for players seeking entertainment without the intensity of a complex plot.
“The narrative is rich and immersive, drawing players into a world filled with depth and emotion.”
“Each character's journey is intricately woven into the main plot, making every moment feel significant.”
“It's the title of the game, but it also tells the story of the developer.”
“It's a great game for when you are bored but don't want to commit to getting sucked into a story.”
- emotional2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The emotional impact of the game is described as heartbreaking, though some players feel that the visual elements, such as reload animations and enemy models, detract from the overall experience.
“It was heartbreaking.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Users have noted that the monetization strategy includes poorly aligned ads, which detracts from the overall gaming experience.
“The monetization strategy feels completely unaligned with the gameplay experience.”
“The presence of unaligned ads disrupts the flow of the game and detracts from enjoyment.”
“I find the monetization approach frustrating, as it often feels like a cash grab rather than a fair system.”