Skip to main content

Resilience Wave Survival

57%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, optimization
57% User Score Based on 212 reviews

Platforms

PCPCWindowsWindows

About

"Resilience: Wave Survival" is a physics-based shooter where you defend against alien invaders, zombies, and robots in an abandoned village. Game modes include Wave, Gun Game, Dead in 5, and Survival, with features like weather, day/night cycle, crafting, and customizable weapons. Explore to scavenge for supplies, upgrade player abilities, and engage in various challenges with high scores and achievements.

Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
Resilience Wave Survival screenshot
+47

57%
Audience ScoreBased on 212 reviews
graphics12 positive mentions
stability18 negative mentions

  • The game has a lot of potential and is being actively developed by a dedicated developer, with frequent updates and improvements.
  • The wave survival mode can be fun and offers a variety of enemies and weapons, providing a casual gameplay experience.
  • The graphics and atmosphere have improved significantly in the latest version, making it visually appealing for a low-cost game.
  • The game suffers from numerous bugs, crashes, and performance issues, making it frustrating to play.
  • Many features and game modes do not work properly, leading to a lack of content and replayability.
  • The AI is poorly designed, and the gameplay can become repetitive and unbalanced, detracting from the overall experience.
  • graphics
    36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the impressive visuals and unique art style, while others criticize the fuzzy environment graphics and issues with default settings that lead to poor performance. Many users report needing to adjust settings extensively to achieve acceptable quality, and some experience crashes or long loading times. Overall, while there are standout moments and appealing designs, the graphical experience is inconsistent and can be frustrating for players.

    • “Graphics 5/5”
    • “I love the graphics style and the gameplay is pretty challenging too.”
    • “Keep in mind I think it's only one developer, but don't let that discourage you; this is not one of those half-assed early access nightmares. The graphics in RWS 2.0 in the forest map are very impressive.”
    • “The environment graphics are very fuzzy; even playing with settings, I can't get them looking normal.”
    • “Utter garbage, unbalanced graphics; some things load for absurdly long times and are prone to crashing.”
    • “Developer indicates the minimum requirement as 'shader model 3.0 graphic card' and 2GB of RAM, but it does not even get to the main menu in a 4.1 graphic card (GT240M) and 4GB RAM.”
  • stability
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a significant concern, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and optimization issues. Players have experienced everything from graphical errors and AI malfunctions to crashes and gameplay inconsistencies. While some users noted smooth performance on higher-end PCs, the overall consensus highlights that the game is currently unpolished and requires substantial improvements to enhance stability.

    • “I know it's not perfect, but it has a lot going for it. There are no glitches, and it plays nice and smooth with a very consistent frame rate and no drops.”
    • “I know it's not perfect, but it has a lot going for it. There are no glitches, and it plays nice and smooth with a very consistent frame rate and no drops.”
    • “Disappointment is all I could say about this download. I would be grateful for a refund; this entire game doesn't even work, it's buggy and crashes instantly.”
    • “What is even worse about this is that the boss glitches through all placed objects (minus buildings), so if you try to hide behind a tree, it just passes through it and hits you anyways.”
    • “New game, very buggy at the moment, mainly AI doesn't work to a decent degree. I need a pretty decent PC to run it without lag. Not too many bad things though; it's a cheap, simple survival game.”
  • gameplay
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is characterized by fun arcade elements and a challenging yet casual experience, particularly in the early-stage survival mode that features effective mechanics and crafting systems. While the overall progression may be limited, the graphics and engaging gameplay offer a solid foundation with potential for future updates. Mechanics are rated 4/5, indicating room for improvement as the game evolves.

    • “The survival mode, although in early stages, is amazingly efficient. The progression system, survival mechanics, and crafting are all there.”
    • “I love the graphics style, and the gameplay is pretty challenging too.”
    • “Fairly simple gameplay, but it has a lot of potential with future updates that are sure to come!”
    • “That is because what it lacks in overall progression it makes up for in casual gameplay.”
    • “Fairly simple gameplay, but has a lot of potential with future updates that are sure to come!”
    • “The survival mode, although in early stages, is amazingly efficient; the progression system and survival mechanics, as well as crafting, are all there.”
  • optimization
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with users reporting bugs, poor performance, and struggles to achieve stable frame rates even on mid-high settings with capable hardware. While some acknowledge the developer's commitment and find value in the game for its price, the overall consensus is that the optimization is lacking and detracts from the experience.

    • “And the developer is really committed to his work; it has some bugs, yes, it's unoptimized, but it's cool.”
    • “Poorly optimized, I struggled to get 60fps on mid-high settings with a GTX 1080.”
    • “For one thing, the performance should be much better for a game this simple.”
    • “Now I will only complain about the game's performance.”
  • atmosphere
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in the game is frequently praised for being immersive and engaging, with solid weapon sounds enhancing the experience. However, some users feel that the promotional screenshots do not adequately represent the game's diverse atmospheric elements and models. Overall, the atmosphere is considered a standout feature, contributing significantly to the game's appeal.

    • “The weapon sounds are solid, and the atmosphere is pretty cool most of the time.”
    • “As well as other variables, the player can select for the maps, including these atmospheric shader types.”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is described as amusing, particularly with moments that involve slow-motion antics, but it may not appeal to players with higher standards or those lacking a good sense of humor. Overall, it seems to cater to a more casual audience looking for lighthearted fun.

    • “It's pretty funny to see things go flying in slow motion.”
    • “If you have a good sense of humor, this game will definitely entertain you.”
  • story
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story serves as a reflection of the developer's journey, providing a unique narrative backdrop. It is designed for casual play, appealing to those who prefer a light experience without deep narrative immersion.

    • “It's the title of the game, but also tells the story of the developer.”
    • “It's a great game for when you are bored but don't want to commit so much as to have to get sucked into a story.”
  • emotional
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players found the emotional impact of the game to be significant, describing moments as "heartbreaking." However, they noted that the visual elements, such as reload animations and enemy models, detracted from the overall experience, suggesting a need for improvement in these areas.

    • “It was heartbreaking.”
    • “It was heartbreaking.”
  • monetization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy has been criticized for featuring poorly aligned ads, which detracts from the overall user experience.

Buy Resilience Wave Survival

Videos

Games Like Resilience Wave Survival

Dinosaur Hunt Image
Nether Image
Fragmented Image
Hellbreach: Vegas Image
The Fifth Day Image
Down To One Image
Survive the Nights Image
Osiris: New Dawn Image
Miscreated Image
Enforcer: Police Crime Action Image
This game contains adult content