Rescue Team 2

Starting at €1.24Buy now

In Rescue Team 2, players lead a team of heroes to repair and rebuild flooded and storm-ravaged towns. Overcome challenging obstacles and dangerous weather conditions to save stranded civilians and animals. Use strategic thinking and time management skills to complete each level and move on to the next, more challenging stage.

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 24 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game offers a nice and relaxing experience, allowing players to pause anytime and return without worry.
Rescue Team 2 provides a good balance between casual and challenging gameplay, making it enjoyable for fans of the genre.
The addition of new elements, such as the fuel depot and various natural events, adds some depth to the gameplay while maintaining the fun of the original.

The game feels shallow and repetitive, with gameplay that can be reduced to simple screen tapping without meaningful decisions.
Technical issues, such as lack of resolution options and poor graphics quality, detract from the overall experience for PC gamers.
Many players find that the game does not significantly improve upon its predecessor, making it feel more like an expansion than a true sequel.

graphics
10 mentions
30 % positive mentions
40 % neutral mentions
30 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are characterized by simple, cartoony 2D visuals reminiscent of low-effort mobile apps, lacking options for resolution changes or significant graphical tweaks. While some players appreciate the colorful art style, the overall presentation is considered underwhelming for a PC game, especially given the expectations for more sophisticated 3D graphics.
- “I really enjoy it; however, I don't see much different from the first game. Both are great, and the art style in the second is better.”
- “Nothing changes from the first game: the graphics are still colorful and nice.”
- “Check this game out if you like casual time management games with cute graphics.”
- “There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks.”
- “The game features simple, cartoony 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort mobile apps.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
gameplay
6 mentions
33 % positive mentions
17 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is characterized by a balance between casual and challenging elements, with a focus on tapping mechanics and resource management. While some players appreciate the pure gameplay experience, others find the lack of strategic planning a drawback, making it difficult to achieve optimal results in timed levels. Overall, it offers engaging mechanics but may not satisfy those seeking a deeper narrative or strategic depth.
- “A good balance between casual and challenging gameplay.”
- “But the fact that you can't plan ahead still heavily impacts the gameplay, though I'm pretty sure you can enjoy some of the levels, which are very hard to finish before losing the gold time.”
- “There's no gameplay, just tapping on the screen.”
- “If you did not play it, then you might as well start with this one, because the differences are marginal: both are using the same basic time/resource manager game mechanics of ordering 1-3 workers to collect resources and clear obstacles.”
- “There is not much story to this game; it is basically pure gameplay, which the developers executed very well.”
story
3 mentions
0 % positive mentions
33 % neutral mentions
67 % negative mentions
The game's narrative is minimal, with users noting that it lacks depth and primarily focuses on gameplay rather than a compelling story. While some appreciate the gameplay mechanics, the overall consensus is that the story is underdeveloped.
- “No story, just a plot.”
- “There is not much story to this game; it's basically pure gameplay, which the developers executed very well.”
music
2 mentions
50 % positive mentions
-100 % neutral mentions
150 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received mixed feedback, with some players finding it irrelevant, while others appreciate the soundtrack as enjoyable.
- “The soundtrack is also nice.”
- “The music is irrelevant.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and uninspired.”
- “The audio quality is poor, making it hard to enjoy the music.”
grinding
1 mentions
0 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
300 % negative mentions
Players have noted that the grinding in the game can become tedious, as the developers relied on repetitive level designs and cute visuals to mask the lack of new content compared to the first game.
- “The developers struggled to come up with as many new stages as the first game had, so they often resorted to drawing cute pictures with the roads, hoping that players would not notice how tedious some of those levels get.”
- “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore, where progress is painfully slow and rewards are minimal.”
- “The repetitive nature of grinding makes it hard to stay engaged; it often feels like I'm just going through the motions without any real sense of achievement.”