Regeria Hope Episode 1

82%
Game Brain Score Based on 292 reviews
  • story
  • gameplay
  • music
Regeria Hope Episode 1 Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam Get on itch.io Store

As Regeria Hope, clear your clients of their crimes, or watch them hang and amass power and wealth. It's up to you.

  • Mac OS
  • PC
  • Windows
  • Linux
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

82%
Audience ScoreBased on 292 reviews
story24 positive mentions
stability6 negative mentions
  • The game offers a fun and lighthearted take on courtroom drama, reminiscent of the Ace Attorney series.
  • The gameplay mechanics, including the ability to influence testimonies and the introduction of a timer, add an interesting layer of strategy.
  • The art style and character designs are appealing, contributing to an enjoyable visual experience.
  • The writing and dialogue can be overly simplistic and one-dimensional, detracting from immersion.
  • The game suffers from bugs and glitches, including issues with the evidence presentation system and confusing UI.
  • The characters, particularly the judge, can come off as annoying and detract from the overall seriousness of the courtroom setting.
  • story84 mentions

    The game's story is a mixed bag, with some players appreciating its charm and engaging case elements, while others criticize its inconsistencies and flat character development. Although it features clever dialogue and intriguing plot twists, many feel it lacks depth compared to similar titles, often relying on predictable tropes. Overall, while the narrative has potential and offers some enjoyable moments, it may leave players wanting more in terms of character depth and coherence.

    • “The game's unique art style and peculiar characters add charm, while the well-crafted story and clever dialogue bring the characters to life.”
    • “The story was very interesting and fresh, considering how many clichés it could've gone off on.”
    • “I recommend this game as the flaws I found were only minute and slightly annoying, whereas the game plays easily and fluidly, while promoting great music and fantastic storytelling.”
    • “For me it was just a waste of time; the story is unfinished and you could soft lock yourself if you didn't get the last two clues from the detective.”
    • “Character-wise, most seem flat as if depth was traded for comedy, which doesn't work well when they try to convey a theme and makes the characters very bland to me, as most are centered on one thing story-wise, which makes things far too predictable.”
    • “All graphic novels live and die by their story and writing, and unfortunately, Regina Hope dies by it.”
  • gameplay76 mentions

    The gameplay is a blend of familiar Ace Attorney mechanics with new features, offering an engaging yet sometimes confusing experience. While many players appreciate the fresh twists and the introduction of time-sensitive elements, others criticize the interface and some mechanics as broken or unintuitive. Overall, the game shows potential with its interesting concepts, but it requires further refinement to enhance player experience.

    • “The gameplay attempts to emulate the style of the Ace Attorney series but introduces some additional mechanics.”
    • “Considering this visual novel is free, it's got cool court/timed mechanics.”
    • “The gameplay and mechanics worked great… perhaps not perfect, but more than expected from a cheap, let alone free-to-play game.”
    • “The tutorial and overall layout are confusing, and the game mechanics are broken or unplayable.”
    • “Generally speaking, though, the gameplay is mostly, 'click, read, click, read' until suddenly, someone tells you, 'click, read, deduce, and present.'”
    • “There are extremely counterintuitive or 'forced' actions that make gameplay stunted and leave the player horribly confused.”
  • music44 mentions

    The music in the game is generally described as pleasant and fitting, though it often lacks the excitement and context-appropriateness expected from a higher-tier title. While some tracks are enjoyable, others feel out of place or reminiscent of elevator music, leading to a mixed reception overall. Many reviewers appreciate the orchestration and background music, but note that it doesn't always enhance the gameplay experience as effectively as in similar games.

    • “The music is fun, the art is visually appealing, and the notion that you can either be the honest or the corrupt lawyer just adds a fun layer of depth to the game.”
    • “Kudos to Zack Parrish for the awesome music, very calm at first but epic as it ramps up!”
    • “I really like the characters a lot, the character art I liked a lot, and the music was very nice to hear.”
    • “The music is decent but not always suitable for the context.”
    • “I admit I'm picky with music, but it still sounded a lot like elevator music to me, and the 'objections' hurt to listen to, to be honest.”
    • “Unfortunately, due to the way the music plays when you hit certain points, it will change frequently enough that you are cycling through different tracks without getting to listen to them.”
  • graphics35 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the unique art style and beautiful visuals, particularly for a free-to-play title. However, some critiques highlight issues such as inconsistent facial expressions and a lack of emotional depth in character designs. Overall, while the artwork is generally well-received, it is noted that there is room for improvement, especially in conveying character emotions.

    • “The game's unique art style and peculiar characters add charm, while the well-crafted story and clever dialogue bring the characters to life.”
    • “The artwork was very well done, and impressive for a free-to-play game.”
    • “So, first off, the graphics are beautiful.”
    • “The graphics themselves aren't Japanese/manga-style at all, and the actual game has nothing to do with the usual themes that visual novels deal with.”
    • “I think a lot of what hinders this game is the visuals.”
    • “By moving the camera all the time, it feels like it's trying to make its visuals impact harder than it should.”
  • humor24 mentions

    The game's humor is characterized by a lighthearted and playful tone, with frequent comedic dialogue and quirky characters, particularly a sandwich-obsessed judge who adds charm. However, some players find the humor inconsistent, with moments feeling forced or corny, and it doesn't quite reach the comedic heights of similar titles like Phoenix Wright. Overall, while the humor may not be universally appealing, it contributes to an entertaining experience that many players appreciate.

    • “The court system presentation was tailored to the American court system (sans the jury), and it possessed the usual dramatics, humorous elements, and emotional reactions you'd expect in a court drama.”
    • “It was lighthearted and funny at moments, and serious and brain-wracking at others.”
    • “The sandwich-obsessed judge is truly hilarious.”
  • stability6 mentions

    The game has been reported to have significant stability issues, including audio bugs, overlapping menus, and various glitches that can detract from the experience. While some players found the gameplay enjoyable despite these problems, the overall consensus indicates that the game is quite buggy and could benefit from further polish.

    • “The game is buggy in audio and overlapping menus.”
    • “I like the interaction concept in this visual novel, but it seems kind of buggy.”
    • “I did notice a few bugs and glitches when playing the game, such as Hemming showing up with Hawk’s name near the end of the trial, but nothing game-breaking.”
  • replayability6 mentions

    The game's replayability is mixed; while it offers multiple endings and interesting character interactions that encourage exploration, some players find it short and not particularly replayable. The incorporation of decision-making elements enhances replay value, but certain mechanics may feel like artificial constraints rather than genuine incentives to replay. Overall, it has potential for replayability, but opinions vary on its effectiveness.

    • “Even if you complete the game, there are different endings, giving it replay value which is vital to many games.”
    • “It's really interesting how they applied Telltale's 'The Walking Dead' formula to the Ace Attorney series, especially since it adds a bunch of replayability if you want to get to know some of the characters more.”
    • “It's free and it's easy to 100% achievements, but it's also short and not exactly replayable.”
    • “Time management can be a fun gameplay mechanic, but I feel as though in this case it may be an unnecessary limiting factor placed to artificially increase replayability.”
    • “This game adds interesting decisions that change how the game progresses, adding more replayability than a standard AA game.”
  • monetization5 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has been criticized for being misleading, as it is essentially a demo or advertisement for an abandoned series rather than a complete game, which detracts from legitimate titles. Users express frustration over developers mislabeling such content on platforms like Steam, while noting the absence of microtransactions.

    • “No microtransactions (I'm serious)”
    • “The game offers a fair monetization model that respects players' time and investment.”
    • “I appreciate that the monetization is transparent and doesn't feel exploitative.”
    • “It's a kickstarted demo/advertisement for a complete game series that was abandoned by the developers, who took the crowdfunding money and ran for the hills.”
    • “While it might seem like an innocuous mistake, publishing demos and advertisements as if they are full games is misleading and in some ways harmful.”
    • “This advertisement is taking up marketing space and visibility that would be better made available to a game developer who did the right thing and created a full game.”
  • emotional5 mentions

    The emotional aspect of the game is characterized by a blend of courtroom drama and humor, but it falls short in delivering impactful emotional reactions, often feeling derivative of the Ace Attorney series. While the portrayal of trauma in the first defendant adds depth, the overall emotional engagement is hindered by a lack of exaggerated expressions that could enhance the experience. The pressure from the timer effectively contributes to the emotional stakes, creating a sense of urgency in decision-making.

    • “The court system presentation was tailored to the American court system (sans the jury), and it possessed the usual dramatics, humorous elements, and emotional reactions you'd expect in a court drama.”
    • “I won't spoil any plot, but the very first defendant has suffered trauma and is emotionally unstable (and rightly so).”
    • “The timer made me feel the pressure of knowing that my mind needs to work quickly if I was to save or condemn my client.”
  • character development3 mentions

    Character development in the game has been criticized for its lack of depth and originality, with many noting that the character designs appear generic and lack emotional resonance. Reviewers feel that the characters seem pre-determined and lack the warmth and creativity found in other titles, such as the Ace Attorney series. Overall, there is a consensus that both the mechanics and presentation of character development need significant improvement.

    • “The game's mechanics, character development, and overall presentation could benefit from improvement.”
    • “Character designs look sloppy; they seem like they came from RPG Maker with pre-determined characters that lack heart and warmth.”
    • “The character designs seem awfully generic, especially in comparison to the Ace Attorney series.”
  • atmosphere3 mentions

    The atmosphere of the game is well-crafted, set in a dystopian 2099 where trials culminate in executions, and judges are more concerned with social media than justice. While it draws comparisons to the Phoenix Wright series with its engaging art and humor, it has yet to reach the same level of depth and polish.

    • “More than the case itself, the atmosphere is well built: we're in 2099, all trials must be followed by an execution for the show, and judges are paper pushers who tweet and think about food instead of serving justice.”
    • “Regeria Hope has a similar atmosphere to Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney. The art works well, the animations work well, and there are some funny lines, but not at PW level (yet).”
    • “Regeria Hope has a similar atmosphere to Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney. The art works well, the animations are decent, and there are some funny lines, but it's not at the same level as Phoenix Wright yet.”
  • optimization2 mentions

    The optimization aspect received a score of 6, indicating a moderate level of performance. While the character's sprite maintains a confident demeanor, there are hints of underlying tension related to performance reviews, suggesting that optimization may not be fully realized in gameplay.

  • grinding1 mentions

    Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or multiple attempts to progress effectively.

    • “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
    • “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
    • “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I was getting nowhere.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Regeria Hope Episode 1

Play time

1hMedian play time
1hAverage play time
1-1hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games