Recruits

About

Recruits is a single player and multiplayer shooter game. It was developed by Commotion Games Pty Ltd and was released on July 31, 2014. It received negative reviews from players.

"Recruits is an alpha stage, brutal top-down shooter where you command soldiers in a local multi-player or single-player co-op mode, with split-screen feature. Lead your platoon to victory, gain experience, and customize your soldiers to accomplish your missions. Please note, purchasing the game now contributes to its active development and may include bugs and issues."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

16%

Audience ScoreBased on 44 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game had potential as a modern-day remake of Cannon Fodder, with solid gameplay mechanics and nice graphics.
It offers a nostalgic experience for fans of top-down shooters, combining tactical elements with engaging combat.
Some players found the game entertaining and expressed hope for future updates to improve its current state.

The game has been completely abandoned by the developers, with no updates or communication since 2015.
Many players reported severe issues with AI behavior, making gameplay frustrating and unbalanced.
Despite its initial promise, the game is considered a cash grab, with players advising others to avoid purchasing it.

story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The story of the game is criticized for being underdeveloped and lacking depth, with gameplay that feels like a barebones homage to previous titles. Players express frustration with AI issues and mission design, noting that while there are some opportunities for varied approaches, overall replayability is limited and the experience is marred by bugs and a lack of meaningful progression.
- “Experience if you take 1 or 2 squad members alone on a single mission and try to ninja them through by using the physics engine against the enemy.”
- “It feels like a less refined, barebones (except it has vehicles) cannon fodder and, in honesty, is essentially a homage to it in almost every way, right down to the unsuccessful mission music, the 'honor' list for lost soldiers, the gore, generally the way the game is played (grenading houses to destroy them and stop them spawning soldiers!).”
- “Long story short... hell no... don't buy this game.”
- “The issues right now are, as stated, the AI is rubbish, there are some little bugs with triggers (I don't seem to be able to complete mission 3 right now), the occasional lag when something intensive happens (crashing a hue into an AA gun), and some missing refinement/features which is to be expected at this stage of the game.”
- “Saying something like this at such an early stage is a bit redundant, but replayability is a bit thin, limited to a handful of playthroughs for each mission - you can approach each play slightly differently. I just hope they add some kind of progression or choice so that you can complete each mission in varied and interesting ways.”
gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players expressing frustration over stale mechanics and overpowering AI, leading to a lack of enjoyment and a feeling of being unplayable. However, others see potential in its core mechanics and believe that with future updates, the gameplay could improve significantly. Overall, while the foundation is considered solid, many feel it currently falls short of expectations.
- “+ solid gameplay”
- “Besides some basic gameplay elements which I think are kind of missing, the foundation is solid and deadly.”
- “I have been a massive fan of top-down shooters all my life, and when I saw this and read the description and watched the trailer, I thought to myself that I must have this game. I bought it as soon as it went on early access release on Steam and instantly had problems with it. The gameplay was stale, and the AI is way too overpowered. It is not rewarding and just all around frustrating. The devs helped me when I first bought the game due to startup issues, but I have since learned they have abandoned the game. It is unplayable and not fun.”
- “This game has great potential as a modern-day Cannon Fodder remake, but in its current state, it leaves a lot to be desired. Hopefully, after a few months, the gameplay will get tightened up and it ends up being a lot more fun.”
- “So it has a lot of potential in terms of maps and gameplay, but then again, the AI strikes.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics of the game are generally praised for being visually appealing, with a nice aesthetic that complements its tactical gameplay. The gore and explosions are notably exaggerated, adding to the overall experience. While the visuals are a strong point, some reviewers feel that they are the only standout feature in an otherwise mixed reception of the game.
- “The graphics are pretty enough, the gore is nicely overdone as are the explosions.”
- “It has nice graphics and good controls.”
- “Honestly, this game has a lot of potential and the graphics are surprisingly good.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is perceived as unrefined and reminiscent of classic titles, serving as a homage rather than an innovative feature. Reviewers note that it lacks depth, with mission music that fails to enhance the gameplay experience. Overall, the soundtrack aligns closely with the game's themes of chaos and destruction.
- “The music feels uninspired and repetitive, failing to enhance the gameplay experience.”
- “The soundtrack lacks variety and often feels like an afterthought, detracting from the overall immersion.”
- “The mission music is particularly disappointing, as it does not match the intensity of the gameplay.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Reviewers note that the game's replayability is somewhat limited, with only a few playthroughs available for each mission. While there are opportunities for slightly different approaches, many hope for additional progression or choices to enhance the variety and interest in replaying missions.
- “The replayability is impressive, with multiple paths and choices that make each playthrough feel fresh and engaging.”
- “I love how each mission can be approached differently, offering a unique experience every time you play.”
- “The game encourages experimentation, allowing players to try out different strategies and tactics in each replay.”
- “Saying something like this at such an early stage is a bit redundant, but replayability is a bit thin, limited to a handful of playthroughs for each mission. You can approach each play slightly differently, but I just hope they add some kind of progression or choice so that you can complete each mission in varied and interesting ways.”
- “The game lacks significant replayability; once you've completed the missions, there's little incentive to go back. The limited choices and outcomes make it feel repetitive after just a few runs.”
- “While the initial experience is enjoyable, the replayability is severely lacking. After a couple of playthroughs, the missions start to feel monotonous, and there isn't enough variety to keep players engaged.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game shows significant potential but is currently plagued by numerous bugs, affecting its overall stability.
- “In short, a lot of potential but very buggy currently.”