Rake

About

"Rake" is a horror simulation game that offers both single-player and multi-player modes. As Gordon Davis, a scientist and explorer, you investigate sightings of a mysterious human-like creature known as Rake, accumulating evidence across different time periods and continents. Despite some bugs, the game boasts an engaging story and excellent atmosphere, blending humor and fright in its depiction of this enigmatic phenomenon. The search for the truth behind Rake and other paranormal beings continues in this immersive and intriguing game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

66%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,754 reviews

gameplay22 positive mentions

graphics34 negative mentions

The game has a creepy atmosphere that effectively builds tension and fear.
Setting traps and placing cameras adds an interesting strategic element to the gameplay.
The encounters with the Rake can be genuinely scary, especially when played at night.

The graphics are outdated and the animations are stiff, detracting from immersion.
The gameplay can become repetitive and boring, especially during the long nights.
Multiplayer functionality is broken and requires third-party software, making it difficult to play with friends.

graphics
135 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
51%
25%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, bland, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles. While some players appreciate the simplistic visuals for adding to the game's charm and atmosphere, the general consensus is that the poor graphics significantly detract from the overall experience, making it feel unpolished and frustrating. Despite the low-quality visuals, a few players still find enjoyment in the gameplay and scares, suggesting that the graphics are not the sole determinant of the game's appeal.
- “The graphics may not be the best, but the darkness of night makes the game extremely spooky.”
- “Love the graphics, pleasing on the eyes and they fit well with the horror aspects of the game.”
- “It's surprising how atmospheric and immersive it is, despite its simplicity and visuals.”
- “The visuals are outdated, with bland textures and stiff animations that detract from the immersion.”
- “The overall aesthetic feels more like an early 2000s game rather than a modern horror experience.”
- “This game is complete trash, the models are disgusting, the graphics are horrible, it's not even scary, the only good thing was the concept but it's so lazy how they did, the rake isn't even the rake, it's a copy and paste alien model from Roblox Studio.”
gameplay
78 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
54%
18%
The gameplay of "Rake" is characterized by a repetitive loop that can quickly become monotonous, with many players noting clunky controls and poor graphics that detract from the experience. While some find the core mechanics and atmosphere intriguing, the lack of polish and variety leads to frustration, making it feel more like a tedious simulator than an engaging horror game. Despite its flaws, a few players appreciate the casual horror elements and the potential for fun, especially in multiplayer settings, but overall, the gameplay is seen as lacking depth and excitement.
- “Everything about this game, the jank, the visuals, the gameplay loop, all of it adds up to this... messy, silly, but classic and enjoyable game.”
- “The rake is fast and you aren't safe anywhere, which really adds a lot of fear to the gameplay.”
- “For an early access horror game, I have to say the gameplay is fun but the graphics are simplistic (which I don't really mind).”
- “This repetitive gameplay loop quickly becomes monotonous, especially since there’s no real narrative or variety to keep things interesting.”
- “All in all the graphics are poor at best, the gameplay is boring and repetitive, the controls are horrid making the game more of a hassle and irritation to play instead of enjoyable like a game is supposed to be.”
- “Considering that's all this game has to offer, considering its extremely short length and redundancy, the wonky controls, ugly graphics and tedious mechanics, you're better off picking up something else for the $5 asking price.”
atmosphere
55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
58%
36%
5%
The game's atmosphere is frequently praised for its eerie and immersive qualities, effectively creating tension and a sense of dread, particularly during nighttime gameplay. While some players appreciate the creepy sounds and environmental design, others note that technical flaws and production issues detract from the overall experience. Despite these shortcomings, many agree that the atmosphere is a standout feature that could be further enhanced with continued development.
- “The dark, foggy forest creates a genuinely creepy atmosphere, and the distant sounds and unsettling noises help build tension as you track the mysterious rake.”
- “The atmosphere of the game is very impressive; besides, the players wind themselves up, trying to set traps before dark and prepare for trouble in advance.”
- “It's surprising how atmospheric and immersive it is, despite its simplicity and visuals.”
- “While it has moments of tension and an eerie atmosphere, the overall experience is hampered by numerous flaws that make it difficult to fully enjoy.”
- “With clunky mechanics, subpar production values and very little in the way of atmosphere, Rake is simply an example of a game that fails to do justice to its source material, and adding the fact the devs abandoned it, one I can't recommend.”
- “This game was trash; the jump scares were weak and the game had no atmosphere.”
story
48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
75%
6%
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it bland and lacking depth, while others appreciate its intriguing premise and environmental storytelling. Many noted that the narrative is minimal, often relying on visuals and player exploration rather than dialogue, which can be refreshing but also leaves much to be desired. Overall, while the concept of hunting a supernatural creature is compelling, the execution falls short for those seeking a rich and engaging storyline.
- “The scenery, character design, and story are good.”
- “Really cool story premise in the multiplayer survival horror genre.”
- “This game is truly what I believe creepypasta games should be, that building dread as you fall further into a story, becoming more invested in finding the truth, and then coming face to face with something horrifying.”
- “There really isn't much of a story, but I'm sure if you get this game, it's not really for the story because all us creepypasta lovers pretty much know the story by now.”
- “This game has tremendously disappointed me, and I was annoyed that I paid 5 dollars for a low-quality rake figure, hit-and-run attacks from the rake, low graphics, and worst of all, there is barely or no story at all.”
- “The game fails to tell you anything about the plot or even how to use some of the items you pick up.”
humor
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely derived from its glitches and absurdities, particularly when played in multiplayer with friends, leading to hilarious moments and unexpected laughter. Players find the creature's design and animations amusing, often turning tense situations into comedic ones, especially when combined with the game's spooky elements. Overall, while the game has its flaws, the shared experience of playing with friends enhances its comedic value, making it a fun, albeit chaotic, horror experience.
- “If you can get a group of friends together to play the multiplayer, though, this will be a hilarious game.”
- “The rake itself is pretty damn glitchy, but honestly that leads to a lot of really funny moments.”
- “Game is hilarious, it gives you some nice spooks and laughs.”
stability
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder the overall experience. Many players describe it as "buggy" and "broken," particularly in multiplayer mode, where connectivity issues and desynchronization are common. While some find humor and enjoyment in the chaos, the consensus is that the game lacks polish and is not worth the investment.
- “The game is very buggy, laggy, and is missing a lot of features it should have.”
- “It's also very buggy and needs more to the game.”
- “It simply isn't polished enough to be considered a good game, and the implementation of multiplayer is a buggy mess that usually guarantees a player will desync from the game entirely, making it unplayable.”
optimization
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
38%
38%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many players reporting poor performance even on high-end hardware, resulting in frustrating gameplay experiences. While some updates have improved performance and AI, the overall consensus is that the game still requires further optimization to meet player expectations. Despite these issues, many users find the game enjoyable and engaging, indicating potential for improvement in future updates.
- “It's an early build with a few bugs and needs optimization, but extremely fun and scary nonetheless.”
- “With new optimization, better Rake AI, and finally some co-op multiplayer, the dev gets all of my praise for coming through and making their game worth the price of admission.”
- “Edit: the game's been updated since I wrote my original review, giving the Rake noticeably better AI and improving the game's overall performance a fair bit, which were two of my biggest issues with it at first.”
- “The guns do little damage, the rake does little damage, the fact that medkits can't go in your inventory annoys me, the cameras are basically useless, the jumpscares are just set ways for you to lose health off the bat, and the game is poorly optimized.”
- “I love the idea of the game and the game itself, however the first time I tried playing it I could not get more than 10fps even on very low settings, my specs far surpass the recommended ones so I cannot recommend the game with such poor optimization.”
- “Horribly optimized, can't play it on low with a 970m but I can play GTA V on very high.”
music
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
63%
19%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its atmospheric and creepy qualities that enhance the horror experience, while others criticize its lack of variety and poor integration with game mechanics. Notably, the soundtrack is described as relaxing and effective in setting the mood, though some users express frustration over the inability to adjust music volume separately from game sounds. Overall, while the music contributes positively to the ambiance, it is overshadowed by other gameplay shortcomings.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes to this music, long enough to realize that I was going to be okay.”
- “You're instantly greeted by the most atmospheric horror music in the video gaming industry, and the rest is history.”
- “The night sounds exactly how it would in the actual woods; the security feed buzzes and woops are oddly addictive to listen to, the animal sounds are loud and jolt-inducing at times, and the little music that unexpectedly plays is reminiscent, in a good way, of Slender: The Arrival.”
- “It's lazy and not worked on by the developer and should be removed from Steam. The only things it does even remotely well are its sound and music.”
- “I can't tell if the creature was creeping up on me or if the music was merely changing tracks.”
- “There's no soundtrack.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it fun and engaging with updates enhancing playability, others feel it lacks significant replay value after completing the content. A few users highlight moments of surprise and enjoyment that contribute to a higher replay value, but many express disappointment in the limited content available.
- “Also, I like the new updates; they make this game much more playable.”
- “For so little content, the idea is extremely fetching, and the replay value is surprisingly high, even with the ending being what it is. Beating the game in its current state should result in a chuckle, smirk, or at least a raised eyebrow.”
- “Very scary, worth the price, replayable as well. It is amazing; you must try it!”
- “No replayability”
- “Zero replayability”
- “For so little content, the idea is extremely fetching, and the replay value is surprisingly high, even with the ending being what it is.”
emotional
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by its ability to evoke nostalgia and deep connections through character interactions, particularly during quick time events. Players report feeling intense emotions, ranging from joy to heartbreak, as the narrative unfolds, often leading to poignant moments that resonate long after gameplay. Despite some criticisms regarding the writing quality, the game's emotional impact remains strong and memorable.
- “Those heartfelt companion bonds can grow when you choose certain options during quick time events.”
- “You have to stop immediately. Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “This game is terrifying as it is heart-breaking.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game is widely criticized as a cash grab, with users expressing disappointment over its perceived exploitation of players, particularly younger audiences. While the price reduction to $5 is noted as a positive change, there are concerns about potential future implementations of loot boxes or other monetization tactics. Overall, the sentiment suggests that the game prioritizes profit over quality.
- “Do not get this game at all, it is a total cash grab and you could get a better scary game with your cash.”
- “It's utter garbage, just a quick cash grab to drag in all the kids who are into creepypasta.”
- “Thanks to the devs for making the game a lot more accessible by lowering the price from the usual $60-$80 title to a much cheaper $5. They better not use this as some sort of excuse to implement loot boxes as a cash grab.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
While some players appreciate the engaging side quests and realistic NPC interactions, many criticize the game's overall execution, citing poor pacing, wonky controls, and tedious mechanics that lead to a frustrating grinding experience. Despite moments of brilliance, the game's short length and lack of variety make it feel repetitive and unworthy of its price.
- “Simply put, what we have here is a great concept poorly executed with terrible pacing and wonky controls, a game with flashes of brilliance that gets boring and tedious extremely fast.”
- “Considering that's all this game has to offer, considering its extremely short length and redundancy, the wonky controls, ugly graphics, and tedious mechanics, you're better off picking up something else for the $5 asking price.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers appreciate the character development, noting that it is enhanced by strong scenery, appealing character design, and a compelling story.