Pythagoria

About

"Pythagoria" is a casual, single-player number puzzle game that challenges players to find missing values in rectangular puzzles using only whole numbers, with 60 unique puzzles and features like freehand drawing and calming BGM music. The game offers five Steam achievements and trading cards for added replayability. Its simple mechanics and gradually increasing difficulty level make it enjoyable for all ages.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

70%

Audience ScoreBased on 128 reviews

music8 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

Offers a good selection of 60 math puzzles that can be enjoyable for those who like geometry.
The game is inexpensive and provides easy achievements and trading cards for completionists.
The built-in drawing tool allows players to jot down notes and calculations, enhancing the problem-solving experience.

The game lacks proper scaling and visual accuracy, making it frustrating for players who rely on visual representations.
Many puzzles can be solved through guessing, as there is no penalty for incorrect answers, reducing the challenge.
The overall execution is flawed, with poor user interface design and a lack of educational value despite its math focus.

music
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
52%
19%
The music in the game is generally described as calming and enjoyable, with some players appreciating its relaxing qualities that complement the gameplay. However, many users find the limited selection of royalty-free tracks repetitive and annoying over time, leading to a desire to turn it off. Overall, while the soundtrack has its fans, it may not suit everyone's taste, with some suggesting that a more varied or orchestral approach would enhance the experience.
- “I actually find the music and visuals along with the unlimited time make it a great game to relax to.”
- “The soundtrack is a very good one, very enjoyable.”
- “[*][b]music[/b] | Pythagoria has a very nice calming soundtrack that fits the game well.”
- “The three songs without copyright it uses start to make you crazy after the second time you hear them.”
- “The music by itself is decent, but I found it to be incredibly distracting and had to turn it off quickly.”
- “This puzzle game is poorly made: bad answering system (you can simply guess until you get it), questions do not contain enough information (you have to guess at assumptions to solve half of the last chapter), and the music becomes extremely annoying, repeating the same 3-4 songs over and over.”
graphics
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
39%
17%
The graphics in the game are described as minimalist yet effective, providing a modern touch with great quality. While the visuals and audio are generally well-received, some players find the misleading scale of the graphical representations adds a layer of difficulty. Overall, the combination of appealing visuals and relaxing music contributes positively to the gaming experience.
- “Great graphical interface.”
- “Amazing graphics.”
- “Overall the graphics are drawn in great quality.”
- “The graphics are minimalist but sufficient.”
- “However, it can be perplexing and adds some difficulty for graphic-oriented people.”
- “I tried using a mix of the math I remembered from school as well as going off the visuals provided, but they don't seem to be to scale, which is very misleading.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
50%
38%
Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of experiences, with some mechanics being poorly implemented, while others find the core gameplay engaging and unique, particularly after overcoming initial challenges. Players appreciate the game's visual style, which adds difficulty, and many consider the three-hour playtime for $2 to be a good value. Overall, while there are some issues, the gameplay is generally seen as enjoyable and accessible.
- “I love how it's visually inaccurate to give it a harder gameplay.”
- “Some mechanics are not working properly and are poorly implemented.”
- “The basic mechanic revolves around figuring out a one-digit number.”
- “The gameplay is pretty self-explanatory in Pythagoria; after you pass the first puzzle, you'll get the hang of it quite nicely.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
14%
57%
Overall, the game exhibits minimal replayability, with many users noting that puzzles do not change between playthroughs. While some players may return to practice or attempt speed runs, the general consensus is that the lack of variety and engaging design limits the game's long-term appeal.
- “I think there is some replay value, since you forget at least some of the earlier levels.”
- “This game is entertaining, well-designed, fun, quotable, and replayable, making it a memorable experience.”
- “Neat execution, no replay value.”
- “There is no replay value to the game.”
- “Puzzles don't change on playthroughs, but as for replay value, you may come back to practice and try them again after a bit, having forgotten the solutions.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews highlight that the grinding aspect of the game is characterized by random and uneven difficulty, leading to a frustrating experience filled with mindless busywork. Players often find themselves engaged in tedious fraction equations and repetitive procedures that lack creativity, making the gameplay feel monotonous and overly simplistic.
- “It's mindless busywork because the students are just grinding through procedures like an automaton.”
- “That sounds tedious in the extreme, and I have an engineering PhD, so it's not like fractions scare me.”
- “Even worse, there are a couple of puzzles where the solution is the unimaginative tedious method of figuring out all of the side lengths.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as a blend of black humor and clever wit, particularly appealing to those who enjoy mental puzzles. However, some users feel that the humor is overshadowed by the game's flaws and the developer's questionable practices, leading to a mixed reception overall.
- “AI that designs minimalist tests of perspective to test your wit and cunning with, as Yathzee Crankshaw calls it, a healthy dose of black humor.”
- “It's a really good and funny mental puzzle game; if you don't like that much math, you would probably not like it, but it's an original concept. 9/10, missing 1 because no new content.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviewers suggest that incorporating a wholesome story and well-developed characters could enhance the emotional depth of the game, potentially leading to greater player engagement and increased profits for the developers.
- “The emotional depth of the characters really drew me in, making me feel connected to their journeys.”
- “I was genuinely moved by the storyline; it resonated with my own experiences and left a lasting impact.”
- “The game beautifully captures the essence of human emotions, making every moment feel significant and heartfelt.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Reviewers suggest that while the game doesn't necessarily need a complex story or characters, incorporating a wholesome narrative could enhance the experience and potentially increase the developer's profits.
- “The story is beautifully crafted, with rich characters that draw you in and keep you engaged throughout the game.”
- “I was genuinely moved by the emotional depth of the narrative; it felt like I was part of something truly special.”
- “The plot twists and character development kept me on the edge of my seat, making it one of the most memorable stories I've experienced in a game.”
- “The story feels underdeveloped and lacks depth, leaving the characters feeling flat and unengaging.”
- “I expected a rich narrative, but instead, I was met with a disjointed plot that failed to captivate.”
- “The lack of a coherent storyline made it difficult to connect with the characters or care about their journeys.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is noted for its clunky performance and numerous bugs, which detract from the overall experience, despite the presence of enjoyable math puzzles.
- “Clunky and buggy, nice math puzzles.”